Cargando…

The Dynamic Innovative Balance System Improves Balance Ability: A Single Blind, Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND: Functional balance training is crucial for both rehabilitation and prevention. A Dynamic Innovative Balance System (DIBA) is readily available for utilization in both functional and postural control training in a wide variety of dynamic conditions. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haksever, Bunyamin, Duzgun, Irem, Baltaci, Gul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: NASMI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8329320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34386281
http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.25756
_version_ 1783732473750880256
author Haksever, Bunyamin
Duzgun, Irem
Baltaci, Gul
author_facet Haksever, Bunyamin
Duzgun, Irem
Baltaci, Gul
author_sort Haksever, Bunyamin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Functional balance training is crucial for both rehabilitation and prevention. A Dynamic Innovative Balance System (DIBA) is readily available for utilization in both functional and postural control training in a wide variety of dynamic conditions. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the DIBA and standard balance training tools on dynamic and static balance. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial METHODS: Thirty-six healthy males (18 to 32 years) were randomly assigned to group DIBA (n=18) or to the control group (n=18) who performed balance training using a balance board, a wobble board, the BOSU, or a soft cushion block for eight weeks. Each participant was assessed before training, at the end of the fourth and eighth week by using the Flamingo balance test (FBT) for assessing static balance ability and using Y-Balance Test (YBT) for dynamic balance ability. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in FBT and YBT between the DIBA and control groups at the end of fourth week (p>0.05). However, at the end of the eighth week, the DIBA group demonstrated statistically significantly better balance ability on the anterior component of YBT (p=0.001) and FBT (p=0.024) than controls. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the DIBA was effective in both static and dynamic balance training and it may be used alongside other balance tools in a clinical setting. Further studies should include in lower extremity problems to confirm that DIBA training adaptations are transferred to clinical improvements in performance and balance qualities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2d
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8329320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher NASMI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83293202021-08-11 The Dynamic Innovative Balance System Improves Balance Ability: A Single Blind, Randomized Controlled Study Haksever, Bunyamin Duzgun, Irem Baltaci, Gul Int J Sports Phys Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: Functional balance training is crucial for both rehabilitation and prevention. A Dynamic Innovative Balance System (DIBA) is readily available for utilization in both functional and postural control training in a wide variety of dynamic conditions. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the DIBA and standard balance training tools on dynamic and static balance. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial METHODS: Thirty-six healthy males (18 to 32 years) were randomly assigned to group DIBA (n=18) or to the control group (n=18) who performed balance training using a balance board, a wobble board, the BOSU, or a soft cushion block for eight weeks. Each participant was assessed before training, at the end of the fourth and eighth week by using the Flamingo balance test (FBT) for assessing static balance ability and using Y-Balance Test (YBT) for dynamic balance ability. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in FBT and YBT between the DIBA and control groups at the end of fourth week (p>0.05). However, at the end of the eighth week, the DIBA group demonstrated statistically significantly better balance ability on the anterior component of YBT (p=0.001) and FBT (p=0.024) than controls. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the DIBA was effective in both static and dynamic balance training and it may be used alongside other balance tools in a clinical setting. Further studies should include in lower extremity problems to confirm that DIBA training adaptations are transferred to clinical improvements in performance and balance qualities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2d NASMI 2021-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8329320/ /pubmed/34386281 http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.25756 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License (4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. If you remix, transform, or build upon this work, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
spellingShingle Original Research
Haksever, Bunyamin
Duzgun, Irem
Baltaci, Gul
The Dynamic Innovative Balance System Improves Balance Ability: A Single Blind, Randomized Controlled Study
title The Dynamic Innovative Balance System Improves Balance Ability: A Single Blind, Randomized Controlled Study
title_full The Dynamic Innovative Balance System Improves Balance Ability: A Single Blind, Randomized Controlled Study
title_fullStr The Dynamic Innovative Balance System Improves Balance Ability: A Single Blind, Randomized Controlled Study
title_full_unstemmed The Dynamic Innovative Balance System Improves Balance Ability: A Single Blind, Randomized Controlled Study
title_short The Dynamic Innovative Balance System Improves Balance Ability: A Single Blind, Randomized Controlled Study
title_sort dynamic innovative balance system improves balance ability: a single blind, randomized controlled study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8329320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34386281
http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.25756
work_keys_str_mv AT hakseverbunyamin thedynamicinnovativebalancesystemimprovesbalanceabilityasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT duzgunirem thedynamicinnovativebalancesystemimprovesbalanceabilityasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT baltacigul thedynamicinnovativebalancesystemimprovesbalanceabilityasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT hakseverbunyamin dynamicinnovativebalancesystemimprovesbalanceabilityasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT duzgunirem dynamicinnovativebalancesystemimprovesbalanceabilityasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT baltacigul dynamicinnovativebalancesystemimprovesbalanceabilityasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy