Cargando…
Removal of SARS-CoV-2 using UV+Filter in built environment
Air cleaning is an effective and reliable method in indoor airborne SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona-Virus 2) control, with ability of aerosol removal or disinfection. However, traditional air cleaning systems (e.g. fibrous filter, electrostatic removal system) have some risks in...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8329429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34367884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103226 |
_version_ | 1783732502143172608 |
---|---|
author | Feng, Zhuangbo Cao, Shi-Jie Haghighat, Fariborz |
author_facet | Feng, Zhuangbo Cao, Shi-Jie Haghighat, Fariborz |
author_sort | Feng, Zhuangbo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Air cleaning is an effective and reliable method in indoor airborne SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona-Virus 2) control, with ability of aerosol removal or disinfection. However, traditional air cleaning systems (e.g. fibrous filter, electrostatic removal system) have some risks in operation process, including re-aerosolization and electric breakdown. To avoid these risks, the current study proposed an UV+Filter (ultraviolet and fibrous pleated filter) system to efficiently capture airborne SARS-CoV-2 aerosols and deactivate them in filter medium. It is challenging to quantitatively design UV+Filter due to complex characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 aerosols (e.g. aerodynamic size, biological susceptibility) and hybrid filtration/disinfection processes. This study numerically investigated the overall performances of different air cleaning devices (e.g. Fibrous-filter, UV+Filter, two-stage ESP (electrostatic precipitator) et al.) for control of SARS-CoV-2 aerosols and compared them in term of filtration efficiency, energy consumption and secondary pollution. The prediction of developed models was validated with the experimental data from literature. UV+Filter is the most reliable and safest, while its energy consumption is highest. The newly proposed design method of air cleaning systems could provide essential tools for airborne diseases control. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8329429 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83294292021-08-03 Removal of SARS-CoV-2 using UV+Filter in built environment Feng, Zhuangbo Cao, Shi-Jie Haghighat, Fariborz Sustain Cities Soc Article Air cleaning is an effective and reliable method in indoor airborne SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona-Virus 2) control, with ability of aerosol removal or disinfection. However, traditional air cleaning systems (e.g. fibrous filter, electrostatic removal system) have some risks in operation process, including re-aerosolization and electric breakdown. To avoid these risks, the current study proposed an UV+Filter (ultraviolet and fibrous pleated filter) system to efficiently capture airborne SARS-CoV-2 aerosols and deactivate them in filter medium. It is challenging to quantitatively design UV+Filter due to complex characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 aerosols (e.g. aerodynamic size, biological susceptibility) and hybrid filtration/disinfection processes. This study numerically investigated the overall performances of different air cleaning devices (e.g. Fibrous-filter, UV+Filter, two-stage ESP (electrostatic precipitator) et al.) for control of SARS-CoV-2 aerosols and compared them in term of filtration efficiency, energy consumption and secondary pollution. The prediction of developed models was validated with the experimental data from literature. UV+Filter is the most reliable and safest, while its energy consumption is highest. The newly proposed design method of air cleaning systems could provide essential tools for airborne diseases control. Elsevier Ltd. 2021-11 2021-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8329429/ /pubmed/34367884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103226 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Feng, Zhuangbo Cao, Shi-Jie Haghighat, Fariborz Removal of SARS-CoV-2 using UV+Filter in built environment |
title | Removal of SARS-CoV-2 using UV+Filter in built environment |
title_full | Removal of SARS-CoV-2 using UV+Filter in built environment |
title_fullStr | Removal of SARS-CoV-2 using UV+Filter in built environment |
title_full_unstemmed | Removal of SARS-CoV-2 using UV+Filter in built environment |
title_short | Removal of SARS-CoV-2 using UV+Filter in built environment |
title_sort | removal of sars-cov-2 using uv+filter in built environment |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8329429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34367884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103226 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fengzhuangbo removalofsarscov2usinguvfilterinbuiltenvironment AT caoshijie removalofsarscov2usinguvfilterinbuiltenvironment AT haghighatfariborz removalofsarscov2usinguvfilterinbuiltenvironment |