Cargando…

Comparing Exogenous Methods to Induce Plant-Resistance Against a Bark-Feeding Insect

Exogenous application of the plant hormone methyl jasmonate (MeJA) can trigger induced plant defenses against herbivores, and has been shown to provide protection against insect herbivory in conifer seedlings. Other methods, such as mechanical damage to seedlings, can also induce plant defenses, yet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yayuan, Puentes, Adriana, Björkman, Christer, Brosset, Agnès, Bylund, Helena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8329535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34354725
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.695867
_version_ 1783732525422608384
author Chen, Yayuan
Puentes, Adriana
Björkman, Christer
Brosset, Agnès
Bylund, Helena
author_facet Chen, Yayuan
Puentes, Adriana
Björkman, Christer
Brosset, Agnès
Bylund, Helena
author_sort Chen, Yayuan
collection PubMed
description Exogenous application of the plant hormone methyl jasmonate (MeJA) can trigger induced plant defenses against herbivores, and has been shown to provide protection against insect herbivory in conifer seedlings. Other methods, such as mechanical damage to seedlings, can also induce plant defenses, yet few have been compared to MeJA and most studies lack subsequent herbivory feeding tests. We conducted two lab experiments to: (1) compare the efficacy of MeJA to mechanical damage treatments that could also induce seedling resistance, (2) examine if subsequent insect damage differs depending on the time since induction treatments occurred, and (3) assess if these induction methods affect plant growth. We compared Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedlings sprayed with MeJA (10 or 15 mM) to seedlings subjected to four different mechanical bark damage treatments (two different bark wound sizes, needle-piercing damage, root damage) and previous pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) damage as a reference treatment. The seedlings were exposed to pine weevils 12 or 32 days after treatments (early and late exposure, hereafter), and resistance was measured as the amount of damage received by plants. At early exposure, seedlings treated with needle-piercing damage received significantly more subsequent pine weevil feeding damage than those treated with MeJA. Seedlings treated with MeJA and needle-piercing damage received 84% less and 250% more pine weevil feeding, respectively, relative to control seedlings. The other treatments did not differ statistically from control or MeJA in terms of subsequent pine weevil damage. For the late exposure group, plants in all induction treatments tended to receive less pine weevil feeding (yet this was not statistically significant) compared to control seedlings. On the other hand, MeJA significantly slowed down seedling growth relative to control and all other induction treatments. Overall, the mechanical damage treatments appeared to have no or variable effects on seedling resistance. One of the treatments, needle-piercing damage, actually increased pine weevil feeding at early exposure. These results therefore suggest that mechanical damage shows little potential as a plant protection measure to reduce feeding by a bark-chewing insect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8329535
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83295352021-08-04 Comparing Exogenous Methods to Induce Plant-Resistance Against a Bark-Feeding Insect Chen, Yayuan Puentes, Adriana Björkman, Christer Brosset, Agnès Bylund, Helena Front Plant Sci Plant Science Exogenous application of the plant hormone methyl jasmonate (MeJA) can trigger induced plant defenses against herbivores, and has been shown to provide protection against insect herbivory in conifer seedlings. Other methods, such as mechanical damage to seedlings, can also induce plant defenses, yet few have been compared to MeJA and most studies lack subsequent herbivory feeding tests. We conducted two lab experiments to: (1) compare the efficacy of MeJA to mechanical damage treatments that could also induce seedling resistance, (2) examine if subsequent insect damage differs depending on the time since induction treatments occurred, and (3) assess if these induction methods affect plant growth. We compared Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedlings sprayed with MeJA (10 or 15 mM) to seedlings subjected to four different mechanical bark damage treatments (two different bark wound sizes, needle-piercing damage, root damage) and previous pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) damage as a reference treatment. The seedlings were exposed to pine weevils 12 or 32 days after treatments (early and late exposure, hereafter), and resistance was measured as the amount of damage received by plants. At early exposure, seedlings treated with needle-piercing damage received significantly more subsequent pine weevil feeding damage than those treated with MeJA. Seedlings treated with MeJA and needle-piercing damage received 84% less and 250% more pine weevil feeding, respectively, relative to control seedlings. The other treatments did not differ statistically from control or MeJA in terms of subsequent pine weevil damage. For the late exposure group, plants in all induction treatments tended to receive less pine weevil feeding (yet this was not statistically significant) compared to control seedlings. On the other hand, MeJA significantly slowed down seedling growth relative to control and all other induction treatments. Overall, the mechanical damage treatments appeared to have no or variable effects on seedling resistance. One of the treatments, needle-piercing damage, actually increased pine weevil feeding at early exposure. These results therefore suggest that mechanical damage shows little potential as a plant protection measure to reduce feeding by a bark-chewing insect. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8329535/ /pubmed/34354725 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.695867 Text en Copyright © 2021 Chen, Puentes, Björkman, Brosset and Bylund. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Chen, Yayuan
Puentes, Adriana
Björkman, Christer
Brosset, Agnès
Bylund, Helena
Comparing Exogenous Methods to Induce Plant-Resistance Against a Bark-Feeding Insect
title Comparing Exogenous Methods to Induce Plant-Resistance Against a Bark-Feeding Insect
title_full Comparing Exogenous Methods to Induce Plant-Resistance Against a Bark-Feeding Insect
title_fullStr Comparing Exogenous Methods to Induce Plant-Resistance Against a Bark-Feeding Insect
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Exogenous Methods to Induce Plant-Resistance Against a Bark-Feeding Insect
title_short Comparing Exogenous Methods to Induce Plant-Resistance Against a Bark-Feeding Insect
title_sort comparing exogenous methods to induce plant-resistance against a bark-feeding insect
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8329535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34354725
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.695867
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyayuan comparingexogenousmethodstoinduceplantresistanceagainstabarkfeedinginsect
AT puentesadriana comparingexogenousmethodstoinduceplantresistanceagainstabarkfeedinginsect
AT bjorkmanchrister comparingexogenousmethodstoinduceplantresistanceagainstabarkfeedinginsect
AT brossetagnes comparingexogenousmethodstoinduceplantresistanceagainstabarkfeedinginsect
AT bylundhelena comparingexogenousmethodstoinduceplantresistanceagainstabarkfeedinginsect