Cargando…

Predicting Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment Response in Stage IV Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients With EGFR Mutation Using Model-Based Deep Transfer Learning

BACKGROUND: For stage IV patients harboring EGFR mutations, there is a differential response to the first-line TKI treatment. We constructed three-dimensional convolutional neural networks (CNN) with deep transfer learning to stratify patients into subgroups with different response and progression r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hou, Runping, Li, Xiaoyang, Xiong, Junfeng, Shen, Tianle, Yu, Wen, Schwartz, Lawrence H., Zhao, Binsheng, Zhao, Jun, Fu, Xiaolong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8329710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34354943
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.679764
_version_ 1783732564536590336
author Hou, Runping
Li, Xiaoyang
Xiong, Junfeng
Shen, Tianle
Yu, Wen
Schwartz, Lawrence H.
Zhao, Binsheng
Zhao, Jun
Fu, Xiaolong
author_facet Hou, Runping
Li, Xiaoyang
Xiong, Junfeng
Shen, Tianle
Yu, Wen
Schwartz, Lawrence H.
Zhao, Binsheng
Zhao, Jun
Fu, Xiaolong
author_sort Hou, Runping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For stage IV patients harboring EGFR mutations, there is a differential response to the first-line TKI treatment. We constructed three-dimensional convolutional neural networks (CNN) with deep transfer learning to stratify patients into subgroups with different response and progression risks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2013 to 2017, 339 patients with EGFR mutation receiving first-line TKI treatment were included. Progression-free survival (PFS) time and progression patterns were confirmed by routine follow-up and restaging examinations. Patients were divided into two subgroups according to the median PFS (<=9 months, > 9 months). We developed a PFS prediction model and a progression pattern classification model using transfer learning from a pre-trained EGFR mutation classification 3D CNN. Clinical features were fused with the 3D CNN to build the final hybrid prediction model. The performance was quantified using area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and model performance was compared by AUCs with Delong test. RESULTS: The PFS prediction CNN showed an AUC of 0.744 (95% CI, 0.645–0.843) in the independent validation set and the hybrid model of CNNs and clinical features showed an AUC of 0.771 (95% CI, 0.676–0.866), which are significantly better than clinical features-based model (AUC, 0.624, P<0.01). The progression pattern prediction model showed an AUC of 0.762(95% CI, 0.643–0.882) and the hybrid model with clinical features showed an AUC of 0.794 (95% CI, 0.681–0.908), which can provide compensate information for clinical features-based model (AUC, 0.710; 95% CI, 0.582–0.839). CONCLUSION: The CNN exhibits potential ability to stratify progression status in patients with EGFR mutation treated with first-line TKI, which might help make clinical decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8329710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83297102021-08-04 Predicting Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment Response in Stage IV Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients With EGFR Mutation Using Model-Based Deep Transfer Learning Hou, Runping Li, Xiaoyang Xiong, Junfeng Shen, Tianle Yu, Wen Schwartz, Lawrence H. Zhao, Binsheng Zhao, Jun Fu, Xiaolong Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: For stage IV patients harboring EGFR mutations, there is a differential response to the first-line TKI treatment. We constructed three-dimensional convolutional neural networks (CNN) with deep transfer learning to stratify patients into subgroups with different response and progression risks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2013 to 2017, 339 patients with EGFR mutation receiving first-line TKI treatment were included. Progression-free survival (PFS) time and progression patterns were confirmed by routine follow-up and restaging examinations. Patients were divided into two subgroups according to the median PFS (<=9 months, > 9 months). We developed a PFS prediction model and a progression pattern classification model using transfer learning from a pre-trained EGFR mutation classification 3D CNN. Clinical features were fused with the 3D CNN to build the final hybrid prediction model. The performance was quantified using area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and model performance was compared by AUCs with Delong test. RESULTS: The PFS prediction CNN showed an AUC of 0.744 (95% CI, 0.645–0.843) in the independent validation set and the hybrid model of CNNs and clinical features showed an AUC of 0.771 (95% CI, 0.676–0.866), which are significantly better than clinical features-based model (AUC, 0.624, P<0.01). The progression pattern prediction model showed an AUC of 0.762(95% CI, 0.643–0.882) and the hybrid model with clinical features showed an AUC of 0.794 (95% CI, 0.681–0.908), which can provide compensate information for clinical features-based model (AUC, 0.710; 95% CI, 0.582–0.839). CONCLUSION: The CNN exhibits potential ability to stratify progression status in patients with EGFR mutation treated with first-line TKI, which might help make clinical decisions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8329710/ /pubmed/34354943 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.679764 Text en Copyright © 2021 Hou, Li, Xiong, Shen, Yu, Schwartz, Zhao, Zhao and Fu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Hou, Runping
Li, Xiaoyang
Xiong, Junfeng
Shen, Tianle
Yu, Wen
Schwartz, Lawrence H.
Zhao, Binsheng
Zhao, Jun
Fu, Xiaolong
Predicting Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment Response in Stage IV Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients With EGFR Mutation Using Model-Based Deep Transfer Learning
title Predicting Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment Response in Stage IV Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients With EGFR Mutation Using Model-Based Deep Transfer Learning
title_full Predicting Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment Response in Stage IV Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients With EGFR Mutation Using Model-Based Deep Transfer Learning
title_fullStr Predicting Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment Response in Stage IV Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients With EGFR Mutation Using Model-Based Deep Transfer Learning
title_full_unstemmed Predicting Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment Response in Stage IV Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients With EGFR Mutation Using Model-Based Deep Transfer Learning
title_short Predicting Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment Response in Stage IV Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients With EGFR Mutation Using Model-Based Deep Transfer Learning
title_sort predicting tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment response in stage iv lung adenocarcinoma patients with egfr mutation using model-based deep transfer learning
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8329710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34354943
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.679764
work_keys_str_mv AT hourunping predictingtyrosinekinaseinhibitortreatmentresponseinstageivlungadenocarcinomapatientswithegfrmutationusingmodelbaseddeeptransferlearning
AT lixiaoyang predictingtyrosinekinaseinhibitortreatmentresponseinstageivlungadenocarcinomapatientswithegfrmutationusingmodelbaseddeeptransferlearning
AT xiongjunfeng predictingtyrosinekinaseinhibitortreatmentresponseinstageivlungadenocarcinomapatientswithegfrmutationusingmodelbaseddeeptransferlearning
AT shentianle predictingtyrosinekinaseinhibitortreatmentresponseinstageivlungadenocarcinomapatientswithegfrmutationusingmodelbaseddeeptransferlearning
AT yuwen predictingtyrosinekinaseinhibitortreatmentresponseinstageivlungadenocarcinomapatientswithegfrmutationusingmodelbaseddeeptransferlearning
AT schwartzlawrenceh predictingtyrosinekinaseinhibitortreatmentresponseinstageivlungadenocarcinomapatientswithegfrmutationusingmodelbaseddeeptransferlearning
AT zhaobinsheng predictingtyrosinekinaseinhibitortreatmentresponseinstageivlungadenocarcinomapatientswithegfrmutationusingmodelbaseddeeptransferlearning
AT zhaojun predictingtyrosinekinaseinhibitortreatmentresponseinstageivlungadenocarcinomapatientswithegfrmutationusingmodelbaseddeeptransferlearning
AT fuxiaolong predictingtyrosinekinaseinhibitortreatmentresponseinstageivlungadenocarcinomapatientswithegfrmutationusingmodelbaseddeeptransferlearning