Cargando…

Leading Topics in Twitter Discourse on JUUL and Puff Bar Products: Content Analysis

BACKGROUND: In response to the recent government restrictions, flavored JUUL products, which are rechargeable closed-system electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes), are no longer available for sale. However, disposable closed-system products such as the flavored Puff Bar e-cigarette continues to be ava...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allem, Jon-Patrick, Dormanesh, Allison, Majmundar, Anuja, Rivera, Vanessa, Chu, Maya, Unger, Jennifer B, Cruz, Tess Boley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8329759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34279236
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26510
_version_ 1783732571954216960
author Allem, Jon-Patrick
Dormanesh, Allison
Majmundar, Anuja
Rivera, Vanessa
Chu, Maya
Unger, Jennifer B
Cruz, Tess Boley
author_facet Allem, Jon-Patrick
Dormanesh, Allison
Majmundar, Anuja
Rivera, Vanessa
Chu, Maya
Unger, Jennifer B
Cruz, Tess Boley
author_sort Allem, Jon-Patrick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In response to the recent government restrictions, flavored JUUL products, which are rechargeable closed-system electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes), are no longer available for sale. However, disposable closed-system products such as the flavored Puff Bar e-cigarette continues to be available. If e-cigarette consumers simply switch between products during the current government restrictions limited to 1 type of product over another, then such restrictions would be less effective. A step forward in this line of research is to understand how the public discusses these products by examining discourse referencing both Puff Bar and JUUL in the same conversation. Twitter data provide ample opportunity to capture such early trends that could be used to help public health researchers stay abreast of the rapidly changing e-cigarette marketplace. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to examine public discourse referencing both Puff Bar and JUUL products in the same conversation on Twitter. METHODS: We collected data from Twitter’s streaming application programming interface between July 16, 2019, and August 29, 2020, which included both “Puff Bar” and “JUUL” (n=2632). We then used an inductive approach to become familiar with the data and generate a codebook to identify common themes. Saturation was determined to be reached with 10 themes. RESULTS: Posts often mentioned flavors, dual use, design features, youth use, health risks, switching 1 product for the other, price, confusion over the differences between products, longevity of the products, and nicotine concentration. CONCLUSIONS: On examining the public’s conversations about Puff Bar and JUUL products on Twitter, having described themes in posts, this study aimed to help the tobacco control community stay informed about 2 popular e-cigarette products with different device features, which can be potentially substituted for one another. Future health communication campaigns may consider targeting the health consequences of using multiple e-cigarette products or dual use to reduce exposure to high levels of nicotine among younger populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8329759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83297592021-08-20 Leading Topics in Twitter Discourse on JUUL and Puff Bar Products: Content Analysis Allem, Jon-Patrick Dormanesh, Allison Majmundar, Anuja Rivera, Vanessa Chu, Maya Unger, Jennifer B Cruz, Tess Boley J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: In response to the recent government restrictions, flavored JUUL products, which are rechargeable closed-system electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes), are no longer available for sale. However, disposable closed-system products such as the flavored Puff Bar e-cigarette continues to be available. If e-cigarette consumers simply switch between products during the current government restrictions limited to 1 type of product over another, then such restrictions would be less effective. A step forward in this line of research is to understand how the public discusses these products by examining discourse referencing both Puff Bar and JUUL in the same conversation. Twitter data provide ample opportunity to capture such early trends that could be used to help public health researchers stay abreast of the rapidly changing e-cigarette marketplace. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to examine public discourse referencing both Puff Bar and JUUL products in the same conversation on Twitter. METHODS: We collected data from Twitter’s streaming application programming interface between July 16, 2019, and August 29, 2020, which included both “Puff Bar” and “JUUL” (n=2632). We then used an inductive approach to become familiar with the data and generate a codebook to identify common themes. Saturation was determined to be reached with 10 themes. RESULTS: Posts often mentioned flavors, dual use, design features, youth use, health risks, switching 1 product for the other, price, confusion over the differences between products, longevity of the products, and nicotine concentration. CONCLUSIONS: On examining the public’s conversations about Puff Bar and JUUL products on Twitter, having described themes in posts, this study aimed to help the tobacco control community stay informed about 2 popular e-cigarette products with different device features, which can be potentially substituted for one another. Future health communication campaigns may consider targeting the health consequences of using multiple e-cigarette products or dual use to reduce exposure to high levels of nicotine among younger populations. JMIR Publications 2021-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8329759/ /pubmed/34279236 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26510 Text en ©Jon-Patrick Allem, Allison Dormanesh, Anuja Majmundar, Vanessa Rivera, Maya Chu, Jennifer B Unger, Tess Boley Cruz. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 19.07.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Allem, Jon-Patrick
Dormanesh, Allison
Majmundar, Anuja
Rivera, Vanessa
Chu, Maya
Unger, Jennifer B
Cruz, Tess Boley
Leading Topics in Twitter Discourse on JUUL and Puff Bar Products: Content Analysis
title Leading Topics in Twitter Discourse on JUUL and Puff Bar Products: Content Analysis
title_full Leading Topics in Twitter Discourse on JUUL and Puff Bar Products: Content Analysis
title_fullStr Leading Topics in Twitter Discourse on JUUL and Puff Bar Products: Content Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Leading Topics in Twitter Discourse on JUUL and Puff Bar Products: Content Analysis
title_short Leading Topics in Twitter Discourse on JUUL and Puff Bar Products: Content Analysis
title_sort leading topics in twitter discourse on juul and puff bar products: content analysis
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8329759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34279236
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26510
work_keys_str_mv AT allemjonpatrick leadingtopicsintwitterdiscourseonjuulandpuffbarproductscontentanalysis
AT dormaneshallison leadingtopicsintwitterdiscourseonjuulandpuffbarproductscontentanalysis
AT majmundaranuja leadingtopicsintwitterdiscourseonjuulandpuffbarproductscontentanalysis
AT riveravanessa leadingtopicsintwitterdiscourseonjuulandpuffbarproductscontentanalysis
AT chumaya leadingtopicsintwitterdiscourseonjuulandpuffbarproductscontentanalysis
AT ungerjenniferb leadingtopicsintwitterdiscourseonjuulandpuffbarproductscontentanalysis
AT cruztessboley leadingtopicsintwitterdiscourseonjuulandpuffbarproductscontentanalysis