Cargando…
The effect of breathing technique on sticking region during maximal bench press
The intrathoracic pressure and breathing strategy on bench press (BP) performance is highly discussed in strength competition practice. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to analyze whether different breathing techniques can influence the time and track characteristics of the sticking region (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Institute of Sport in Warsaw
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8329978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34475625 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2021.100362 |
_version_ | 1783732606484873216 |
---|---|
author | Blazek, Dusan Kolinger, Dominik Petruzela, Jan Kubovy, Petr Golas, Artur Petr, Miroslav Pisz, Anna Stastny, Petr |
author_facet | Blazek, Dusan Kolinger, Dominik Petruzela, Jan Kubovy, Petr Golas, Artur Petr, Miroslav Pisz, Anna Stastny, Petr |
author_sort | Blazek, Dusan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The intrathoracic pressure and breathing strategy on bench press (BP) performance is highly discussed in strength competition practice. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to analyze whether different breathing techniques can influence the time and track characteristics of the sticking region (SR) during the 1RM BP exercise. 24 healthy, male adults (age 23 ± 2.4 yrs., body mass 85 ± 9.2 kg, height 181 ± 5.4 cm) performed a 1 repetition BP using the breathing technique of Valsalva maneuver (VM), hold breath, lung packing (PAC), and reverse breathing (REVB), while maximum lifted load and concentric phase kinematics were recorded. The results of ANOVA showed that the REVB breathing decreased absolute (p < 0.04) and relative lifted load (p < 0.01). The VM showed lower (p = 0.01) concentric time of the lift than the other breathing techniques. The VM and PAC showed lower SR time than other breathing techniques, where PAC showed a lower SR time than VM (p = 0.02). The PAC techniques resulted in shorter SR and pre-SR track than other breathing techniques and the REVB showed longer SR track than the other considered breathing techniques (p = 0.04). Thus, PAC or VM should be used for 1RM BP lifting according to preferences, experiences and lifting comfort of an athlete. The hold breath technique does not seem to excessively decrease the lifting load, but this method will increase the lifting time and the time spend in the sticking region, therefore its use does not provide any lifting benefit. The authors suggest that the REVB should not be used during 1 RM lifts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8329978 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Institute of Sport in Warsaw |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83299782021-09-01 The effect of breathing technique on sticking region during maximal bench press Blazek, Dusan Kolinger, Dominik Petruzela, Jan Kubovy, Petr Golas, Artur Petr, Miroslav Pisz, Anna Stastny, Petr Biol Sport Original Paper The intrathoracic pressure and breathing strategy on bench press (BP) performance is highly discussed in strength competition practice. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to analyze whether different breathing techniques can influence the time and track characteristics of the sticking region (SR) during the 1RM BP exercise. 24 healthy, male adults (age 23 ± 2.4 yrs., body mass 85 ± 9.2 kg, height 181 ± 5.4 cm) performed a 1 repetition BP using the breathing technique of Valsalva maneuver (VM), hold breath, lung packing (PAC), and reverse breathing (REVB), while maximum lifted load and concentric phase kinematics were recorded. The results of ANOVA showed that the REVB breathing decreased absolute (p < 0.04) and relative lifted load (p < 0.01). The VM showed lower (p = 0.01) concentric time of the lift than the other breathing techniques. The VM and PAC showed lower SR time than other breathing techniques, where PAC showed a lower SR time than VM (p = 0.02). The PAC techniques resulted in shorter SR and pre-SR track than other breathing techniques and the REVB showed longer SR track than the other considered breathing techniques (p = 0.04). Thus, PAC or VM should be used for 1RM BP lifting according to preferences, experiences and lifting comfort of an athlete. The hold breath technique does not seem to excessively decrease the lifting load, but this method will increase the lifting time and the time spend in the sticking region, therefore its use does not provide any lifting benefit. The authors suggest that the REVB should not be used during 1 RM lifts. Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2020-11-04 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8329978/ /pubmed/34475625 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2021.100362 Text en Copyright © Biology of Sport 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Blazek, Dusan Kolinger, Dominik Petruzela, Jan Kubovy, Petr Golas, Artur Petr, Miroslav Pisz, Anna Stastny, Petr The effect of breathing technique on sticking region during maximal bench press |
title | The effect of breathing technique on sticking region during maximal bench press |
title_full | The effect of breathing technique on sticking region during maximal bench press |
title_fullStr | The effect of breathing technique on sticking region during maximal bench press |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of breathing technique on sticking region during maximal bench press |
title_short | The effect of breathing technique on sticking region during maximal bench press |
title_sort | effect of breathing technique on sticking region during maximal bench press |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8329978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34475625 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2021.100362 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blazekdusan theeffectofbreathingtechniqueonstickingregionduringmaximalbenchpress AT kolingerdominik theeffectofbreathingtechniqueonstickingregionduringmaximalbenchpress AT petruzelajan theeffectofbreathingtechniqueonstickingregionduringmaximalbenchpress AT kubovypetr theeffectofbreathingtechniqueonstickingregionduringmaximalbenchpress AT golasartur theeffectofbreathingtechniqueonstickingregionduringmaximalbenchpress AT petrmiroslav theeffectofbreathingtechniqueonstickingregionduringmaximalbenchpress AT piszanna theeffectofbreathingtechniqueonstickingregionduringmaximalbenchpress AT stastnypetr theeffectofbreathingtechniqueonstickingregionduringmaximalbenchpress AT blazekdusan effectofbreathingtechniqueonstickingregionduringmaximalbenchpress AT kolingerdominik effectofbreathingtechniqueonstickingregionduringmaximalbenchpress AT petruzelajan effectofbreathingtechniqueonstickingregionduringmaximalbenchpress AT kubovypetr effectofbreathingtechniqueonstickingregionduringmaximalbenchpress AT golasartur effectofbreathingtechniqueonstickingregionduringmaximalbenchpress AT petrmiroslav effectofbreathingtechniqueonstickingregionduringmaximalbenchpress AT piszanna effectofbreathingtechniqueonstickingregionduringmaximalbenchpress AT stastnypetr effectofbreathingtechniqueonstickingregionduringmaximalbenchpress |