Cargando…
A comparison of machine learning classifiers for pediatric epilepsy using resting-state functional MRI latency data
Epilepsy affects 1 in 150 children under the age of 10 and is the most common chronic pediatric neurological condition; poor seizure control can irreversibly disrupt normal brain development. The present study compared the ability of different machine learning algorithms trained with resting-state f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
D.A. Spandidos
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8330002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34405049 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/br.2021.1453 |
_version_ | 1783732612302372864 |
---|---|
author | Nguyen, Ryan D. Smyth, Matthew D. Zhu, Liang Pao, Ludovic P. Swisher, Shannon K. Kennady, Emmett H. Mitra, Anish Patel, Rajan P. Lankford, Jeremy E. Von Allmen, Gretchen Watkins, Michael W. Funke, Michael E. Shah, Manish N. |
author_facet | Nguyen, Ryan D. Smyth, Matthew D. Zhu, Liang Pao, Ludovic P. Swisher, Shannon K. Kennady, Emmett H. Mitra, Anish Patel, Rajan P. Lankford, Jeremy E. Von Allmen, Gretchen Watkins, Michael W. Funke, Michael E. Shah, Manish N. |
author_sort | Nguyen, Ryan D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Epilepsy affects 1 in 150 children under the age of 10 and is the most common chronic pediatric neurological condition; poor seizure control can irreversibly disrupt normal brain development. The present study compared the ability of different machine learning algorithms trained with resting-state functional MRI (rfMRI) latency data to detect epilepsy. Preoperative rfMRI and anatomical MRI scans were obtained for 63 patients with epilepsy and 259 healthy controls. The normal distribution of latency z-scores from the epilepsy and healthy control cohorts were analyzed for overlap in 36 seed regions. In these seed regions, overlap between the study cohorts ranged from 0.44-0.58. Machine learning features were extracted from latency z-score maps using principal component analysis. Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Random Forest algorithms were trained with these features. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and F1-scores were used to evaluate model performance. The XGBoost model outperformed all other models with a test AUC of 0.79, accuracy of 74%, specificity of 73%, and a sensitivity of 77%. The Random Forest model performed comparably to XGBoost across multiple metrics, but it had a test sensitivity of 31%. The SVM model did not perform >70% in any of the test metrics. The XGBoost model had the highest sensitivity and accuracy for the detection of epilepsy. Development of machine learning algorithms trained with rfMRI latency data could provide an adjunctive method for the diagnosis and evaluation of epilepsy with the goal of enabling timely and appropriate care for patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8330002 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | D.A. Spandidos |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83300022021-08-16 A comparison of machine learning classifiers for pediatric epilepsy using resting-state functional MRI latency data Nguyen, Ryan D. Smyth, Matthew D. Zhu, Liang Pao, Ludovic P. Swisher, Shannon K. Kennady, Emmett H. Mitra, Anish Patel, Rajan P. Lankford, Jeremy E. Von Allmen, Gretchen Watkins, Michael W. Funke, Michael E. Shah, Manish N. Biomed Rep Articles Epilepsy affects 1 in 150 children under the age of 10 and is the most common chronic pediatric neurological condition; poor seizure control can irreversibly disrupt normal brain development. The present study compared the ability of different machine learning algorithms trained with resting-state functional MRI (rfMRI) latency data to detect epilepsy. Preoperative rfMRI and anatomical MRI scans were obtained for 63 patients with epilepsy and 259 healthy controls. The normal distribution of latency z-scores from the epilepsy and healthy control cohorts were analyzed for overlap in 36 seed regions. In these seed regions, overlap between the study cohorts ranged from 0.44-0.58. Machine learning features were extracted from latency z-score maps using principal component analysis. Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Random Forest algorithms were trained with these features. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and F1-scores were used to evaluate model performance. The XGBoost model outperformed all other models with a test AUC of 0.79, accuracy of 74%, specificity of 73%, and a sensitivity of 77%. The Random Forest model performed comparably to XGBoost across multiple metrics, but it had a test sensitivity of 31%. The SVM model did not perform >70% in any of the test metrics. The XGBoost model had the highest sensitivity and accuracy for the detection of epilepsy. Development of machine learning algorithms trained with rfMRI latency data could provide an adjunctive method for the diagnosis and evaluation of epilepsy with the goal of enabling timely and appropriate care for patients. D.A. Spandidos 2021-09 2021-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8330002/ /pubmed/34405049 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/br.2021.1453 Text en Copyright: © Nguyen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Articles Nguyen, Ryan D. Smyth, Matthew D. Zhu, Liang Pao, Ludovic P. Swisher, Shannon K. Kennady, Emmett H. Mitra, Anish Patel, Rajan P. Lankford, Jeremy E. Von Allmen, Gretchen Watkins, Michael W. Funke, Michael E. Shah, Manish N. A comparison of machine learning classifiers for pediatric epilepsy using resting-state functional MRI latency data |
title | A comparison of machine learning classifiers for pediatric epilepsy using resting-state functional MRI latency data |
title_full | A comparison of machine learning classifiers for pediatric epilepsy using resting-state functional MRI latency data |
title_fullStr | A comparison of machine learning classifiers for pediatric epilepsy using resting-state functional MRI latency data |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of machine learning classifiers for pediatric epilepsy using resting-state functional MRI latency data |
title_short | A comparison of machine learning classifiers for pediatric epilepsy using resting-state functional MRI latency data |
title_sort | comparison of machine learning classifiers for pediatric epilepsy using resting-state functional mri latency data |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8330002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34405049 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/br.2021.1453 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nguyenryand acomparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforpediatricepilepsyusingrestingstatefunctionalmrilatencydata AT smythmatthewd acomparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforpediatricepilepsyusingrestingstatefunctionalmrilatencydata AT zhuliang acomparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforpediatricepilepsyusingrestingstatefunctionalmrilatencydata AT paoludovicp acomparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforpediatricepilepsyusingrestingstatefunctionalmrilatencydata AT swishershannonk acomparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforpediatricepilepsyusingrestingstatefunctionalmrilatencydata AT kennadyemmetth acomparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforpediatricepilepsyusingrestingstatefunctionalmrilatencydata AT mitraanish acomparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforpediatricepilepsyusingrestingstatefunctionalmrilatencydata AT patelrajanp acomparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforpediatricepilepsyusingrestingstatefunctionalmrilatencydata AT lankfordjeremye acomparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforpediatricepilepsyusingrestingstatefunctionalmrilatencydata AT vonallmengretchen acomparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforpediatricepilepsyusingrestingstatefunctionalmrilatencydata AT watkinsmichaelw acomparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforpediatricepilepsyusingrestingstatefunctionalmrilatencydata AT funkemichaele acomparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforpediatricepilepsyusingrestingstatefunctionalmrilatencydata AT shahmanishn acomparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforpediatricepilepsyusingrestingstatefunctionalmrilatencydata AT nguyenryand comparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforpediatricepilepsyusingrestingstatefunctionalmrilatencydata AT smythmatthewd comparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforpediatricepilepsyusingrestingstatefunctionalmrilatencydata AT zhuliang comparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforpediatricepilepsyusingrestingstatefunctionalmrilatencydata AT paoludovicp comparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforpediatricepilepsyusingrestingstatefunctionalmrilatencydata AT swishershannonk comparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforpediatricepilepsyusingrestingstatefunctionalmrilatencydata AT kennadyemmetth comparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforpediatricepilepsyusingrestingstatefunctionalmrilatencydata AT mitraanish comparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforpediatricepilepsyusingrestingstatefunctionalmrilatencydata AT patelrajanp comparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforpediatricepilepsyusingrestingstatefunctionalmrilatencydata AT lankfordjeremye comparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforpediatricepilepsyusingrestingstatefunctionalmrilatencydata AT vonallmengretchen comparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforpediatricepilepsyusingrestingstatefunctionalmrilatencydata AT watkinsmichaelw comparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforpediatricepilepsyusingrestingstatefunctionalmrilatencydata AT funkemichaele comparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforpediatricepilepsyusingrestingstatefunctionalmrilatencydata AT shahmanishn comparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforpediatricepilepsyusingrestingstatefunctionalmrilatencydata |