Cargando…

Modified completely intrafascial radical cysprostatectomy for bladder cancer: a single-center, blinded, controlled study

BACKGROUND: We have proposed a modified, completely intrafascial radical cysprostatectomy (RC) to treat bladder cancer patients with the aim of preserving the patients’ post-surgical urinary control and erectile function. This study aimed to evaluate the oncological and functional outcomes of this i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Xiao, Guo, Jia, Wang, Lei, Wang, Min, Weng, Xiaodong, Chen, Hui, Liu, Xiuheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8330068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34340675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08568-z
_version_ 1783732626293522432
author Wang, Xiao
Guo, Jia
Wang, Lei
Wang, Min
Weng, Xiaodong
Chen, Hui
Liu, Xiuheng
author_facet Wang, Xiao
Guo, Jia
Wang, Lei
Wang, Min
Weng, Xiaodong
Chen, Hui
Liu, Xiuheng
author_sort Wang, Xiao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We have proposed a modified, completely intrafascial radical cysprostatectomy (RC) to treat bladder cancer patients with the aim of preserving the patients’ post-surgical urinary control and erectile function. This study aimed to evaluate the oncological and functional outcomes of this innovation relatively to that with the conventional technique. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center, blinded, and controlled study was conducted using the medical data of patients since the past 5 years from the hospital database. A total of 44 patients were included, including 20 who received complete intrafascial cysprostatectomy and 24 who received conventional interfascial surgeries. The patients’ continent and sexual information of 1-year follow-up after the surgery were extracted. The oncological and functional outcomes of the 2 groups were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: The demographics parameters of the 2 groups showed no significant difference. The results of follow-up of the oncological outcomes did not reveal any significant difference between the completely intrafascial group and the conventional interfascial group in terms of the positive surgical margins, local recurrences, and distant metastasis. Patients following neobladder diversion in the intrafascial group showed a faster recovery of the urinary control, with a 76.9% (10/13) daytime continent rate at 3-month, as well as 46.2% (6/13) and 58.3% (7/12) nighttime continent rates at 3-month and 6-month, respectively. Regarding the sexual functions, our results revealed significant advantages in favor of completely intrafascial technique on the post-surgical International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5 score at 3-, 9-, and 12-month follow-up relative to that with the conventional interfascial process. Thus, the IIEF score of patients in the intrafascial group was 11.4 ± 3.5 at 3-month, 14.1 ± 3.6 at 9-month, and 15.2 ± 3.8 at 12-month follow-up after the cystectomy, which was significantly greater than that of the patients in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel data illustrated that the modified completely intrafascial technique could result in a better sexual function and faster continence recovery for patients following RC, without any compromise in the cancer control. Thus, this technique could be considered as an alternative extirpative technique for bladder cancer treatment in a clinical setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8330068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83300682021-08-04 Modified completely intrafascial radical cysprostatectomy for bladder cancer: a single-center, blinded, controlled study Wang, Xiao Guo, Jia Wang, Lei Wang, Min Weng, Xiaodong Chen, Hui Liu, Xiuheng BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: We have proposed a modified, completely intrafascial radical cysprostatectomy (RC) to treat bladder cancer patients with the aim of preserving the patients’ post-surgical urinary control and erectile function. This study aimed to evaluate the oncological and functional outcomes of this innovation relatively to that with the conventional technique. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center, blinded, and controlled study was conducted using the medical data of patients since the past 5 years from the hospital database. A total of 44 patients were included, including 20 who received complete intrafascial cysprostatectomy and 24 who received conventional interfascial surgeries. The patients’ continent and sexual information of 1-year follow-up after the surgery were extracted. The oncological and functional outcomes of the 2 groups were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: The demographics parameters of the 2 groups showed no significant difference. The results of follow-up of the oncological outcomes did not reveal any significant difference between the completely intrafascial group and the conventional interfascial group in terms of the positive surgical margins, local recurrences, and distant metastasis. Patients following neobladder diversion in the intrafascial group showed a faster recovery of the urinary control, with a 76.9% (10/13) daytime continent rate at 3-month, as well as 46.2% (6/13) and 58.3% (7/12) nighttime continent rates at 3-month and 6-month, respectively. Regarding the sexual functions, our results revealed significant advantages in favor of completely intrafascial technique on the post-surgical International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5 score at 3-, 9-, and 12-month follow-up relative to that with the conventional interfascial process. Thus, the IIEF score of patients in the intrafascial group was 11.4 ± 3.5 at 3-month, 14.1 ± 3.6 at 9-month, and 15.2 ± 3.8 at 12-month follow-up after the cystectomy, which was significantly greater than that of the patients in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel data illustrated that the modified completely intrafascial technique could result in a better sexual function and faster continence recovery for patients following RC, without any compromise in the cancer control. Thus, this technique could be considered as an alternative extirpative technique for bladder cancer treatment in a clinical setting. BioMed Central 2021-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8330068/ /pubmed/34340675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08568-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wang, Xiao
Guo, Jia
Wang, Lei
Wang, Min
Weng, Xiaodong
Chen, Hui
Liu, Xiuheng
Modified completely intrafascial radical cysprostatectomy for bladder cancer: a single-center, blinded, controlled study
title Modified completely intrafascial radical cysprostatectomy for bladder cancer: a single-center, blinded, controlled study
title_full Modified completely intrafascial radical cysprostatectomy for bladder cancer: a single-center, blinded, controlled study
title_fullStr Modified completely intrafascial radical cysprostatectomy for bladder cancer: a single-center, blinded, controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Modified completely intrafascial radical cysprostatectomy for bladder cancer: a single-center, blinded, controlled study
title_short Modified completely intrafascial radical cysprostatectomy for bladder cancer: a single-center, blinded, controlled study
title_sort modified completely intrafascial radical cysprostatectomy for bladder cancer: a single-center, blinded, controlled study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8330068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34340675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08568-z
work_keys_str_mv AT wangxiao modifiedcompletelyintrafascialradicalcysprostatectomyforbladdercancerasinglecenterblindedcontrolledstudy
AT guojia modifiedcompletelyintrafascialradicalcysprostatectomyforbladdercancerasinglecenterblindedcontrolledstudy
AT wanglei modifiedcompletelyintrafascialradicalcysprostatectomyforbladdercancerasinglecenterblindedcontrolledstudy
AT wangmin modifiedcompletelyintrafascialradicalcysprostatectomyforbladdercancerasinglecenterblindedcontrolledstudy
AT wengxiaodong modifiedcompletelyintrafascialradicalcysprostatectomyforbladdercancerasinglecenterblindedcontrolledstudy
AT chenhui modifiedcompletelyintrafascialradicalcysprostatectomyforbladdercancerasinglecenterblindedcontrolledstudy
AT liuxiuheng modifiedcompletelyintrafascialradicalcysprostatectomyforbladdercancerasinglecenterblindedcontrolledstudy