Cargando…
Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients on Treatment Dose Anti-Coagulation Compared to Prophylactic Dose Anti-Coagulation
Introduction The outcomes related to different anticoagulation doses in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients are not well established. COVID-19 is associated with increased thrombotic events and early coagulopathy as reported by a large New York City health system. Initial studies on patient...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society of Hematology
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8330337/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2020-142552 |
_version_ | 1783732694185672704 |
---|---|
author | Kodama, Rich Kalsi, Amardeep Singh, Angelica Vishnuvardhan, Nivetha Nimkar, Neil Paul, Sonal Usta, Soeb Ashraf, Farah Mazloom, Anita Ashfaq, Abeer Patel, Nisha Kumarasinghe, Chathula Khan, Uqba Gregos, Peter Weingarten, Jeremy Patel, Eshan |
author_facet | Kodama, Rich Kalsi, Amardeep Singh, Angelica Vishnuvardhan, Nivetha Nimkar, Neil Paul, Sonal Usta, Soeb Ashraf, Farah Mazloom, Anita Ashfaq, Abeer Patel, Nisha Kumarasinghe, Chathula Khan, Uqba Gregos, Peter Weingarten, Jeremy Patel, Eshan |
author_sort | Kodama, Rich |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction The outcomes related to different anticoagulation doses in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients are not well established. COVID-19 is associated with increased thrombotic events and early coagulopathy as reported by a large New York City health system. Initial studies on patients in Wuhan, China showed anticoagulant therapy mainly with low molecular weight heparin was reported to be associated with better prognosis in severe COVID‐19 patients meeting sepsis‐induced coagulopathy criteria or with markedly elevated D‐dimer. These studies fueled the need for anticoagulation protocols to be institutionalized broadly. Here we report the outcomes of patients on prophylactic compared to treatment dose anticoagulation early in the COVID-19 pandemic. This data reflects results before broad institutionalization of anticoagulation protocols for this novel disease in a Brooklyn, New York population. Methods This is a retrospective chart review of all laboratory confirmed COVID-19 patients who were admitted to New York-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital between March and April, 2020. Patient clinical characteristics were manually extracted from electronic medical records. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients on treatment dose anticoagulation and patients on prophylactic dose anticoagulation. Primary outcome of this study was inpatient mortality among the two groups. Secondary outcomes were thromboembolisms (both arterial and venous), myocardial infarction (MI), major bleeding, ICU admission, ICU length of stay, invasive mechanical ventilation and initiation of dialysis. Odds ratio and p-values were obtained using univariate analysis. Results We analyzed 580 hospitalized patients with confirmed nasopharyngeal COVID19 infection. Of these, 82 patients were on treatment dose anticoagulation 498 patients were on prophylactic dose. Median age was 70 years in treatment dose group and 66 years in prophylactic dose group. Percentage of males were similar between both groups (53%). African American race(56% vs 46%) was the predominant race in both groups. Median BMI was 28.1 in both groups. Percentage of smokers was higher in the treatment dose group (34% compared to 21%). Patients in the treatment dose group had a higher rate of all the comorbidities. Median D-Dimer (630 vs 590) was higher in the treatment dose group. Rates of ICU admission in treatment dose group and prophylactic dose group was 44% and 22% respectively. Patients requiring intubation (43% vs 24%) and transfusion (24% and 7%) were higher in the treatment dose group. There was an increased incidence of thromboembolic events in the treatment dose group as compared to prophylactic dose group with DVT (15.6% vs 1.6%) PE (3.7% vs 0.2%), arterial thrombosis (1.2% vs 0%) and MI (6.1% vs 1.6%). Incidence of major bleeding was higher in the treatment group (10% vs3.5%) Discussion Our study found increased inpatient mortality with treatment dose anticoagulation and increased risk of bleeding when compared with prophylactic dose anticoagulation. These findings may be due to higher rates of comorbidities, smoking and older age when compared to the prophylactic anticoagulation group. Higher rates of bleeding raises concern for the safety of treatment dose anticoagulation in these populations. Some limitations of this study include: uneven sample size between the two groups and data was collected from patients before anticoagulation dose recommendations were standardized and officially implemented. Further randomized control trials are needed to evaluate the dose- dependent relationship between anticoagulation and mortality. Our study suggests that the treatment dose anticoagulation may adversely affect the outcomes in COVID-19 patients who are older and have multiple comorbidities. Therefore, the anticoagulation dose must be chosen carefully given the overall clinical picture. [Figure: see text] DISCLOSURES: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8330337 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | American Society of Hematology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83303372021-08-03 Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients on Treatment Dose Anti-Coagulation Compared to Prophylactic Dose Anti-Coagulation Kodama, Rich Kalsi, Amardeep Singh, Angelica Vishnuvardhan, Nivetha Nimkar, Neil Paul, Sonal Usta, Soeb Ashraf, Farah Mazloom, Anita Ashfaq, Abeer Patel, Nisha Kumarasinghe, Chathula Khan, Uqba Gregos, Peter Weingarten, Jeremy Patel, Eshan Blood 332.Anticoagulation and Antithrombotic Therapy Introduction The outcomes related to different anticoagulation doses in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients are not well established. COVID-19 is associated with increased thrombotic events and early coagulopathy as reported by a large New York City health system. Initial studies on patients in Wuhan, China showed anticoagulant therapy mainly with low molecular weight heparin was reported to be associated with better prognosis in severe COVID‐19 patients meeting sepsis‐induced coagulopathy criteria or with markedly elevated D‐dimer. These studies fueled the need for anticoagulation protocols to be institutionalized broadly. Here we report the outcomes of patients on prophylactic compared to treatment dose anticoagulation early in the COVID-19 pandemic. This data reflects results before broad institutionalization of anticoagulation protocols for this novel disease in a Brooklyn, New York population. Methods This is a retrospective chart review of all laboratory confirmed COVID-19 patients who were admitted to New York-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital between March and April, 2020. Patient clinical characteristics were manually extracted from electronic medical records. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients on treatment dose anticoagulation and patients on prophylactic dose anticoagulation. Primary outcome of this study was inpatient mortality among the two groups. Secondary outcomes were thromboembolisms (both arterial and venous), myocardial infarction (MI), major bleeding, ICU admission, ICU length of stay, invasive mechanical ventilation and initiation of dialysis. Odds ratio and p-values were obtained using univariate analysis. Results We analyzed 580 hospitalized patients with confirmed nasopharyngeal COVID19 infection. Of these, 82 patients were on treatment dose anticoagulation 498 patients were on prophylactic dose. Median age was 70 years in treatment dose group and 66 years in prophylactic dose group. Percentage of males were similar between both groups (53%). African American race(56% vs 46%) was the predominant race in both groups. Median BMI was 28.1 in both groups. Percentage of smokers was higher in the treatment dose group (34% compared to 21%). Patients in the treatment dose group had a higher rate of all the comorbidities. Median D-Dimer (630 vs 590) was higher in the treatment dose group. Rates of ICU admission in treatment dose group and prophylactic dose group was 44% and 22% respectively. Patients requiring intubation (43% vs 24%) and transfusion (24% and 7%) were higher in the treatment dose group. There was an increased incidence of thromboembolic events in the treatment dose group as compared to prophylactic dose group with DVT (15.6% vs 1.6%) PE (3.7% vs 0.2%), arterial thrombosis (1.2% vs 0%) and MI (6.1% vs 1.6%). Incidence of major bleeding was higher in the treatment group (10% vs3.5%) Discussion Our study found increased inpatient mortality with treatment dose anticoagulation and increased risk of bleeding when compared with prophylactic dose anticoagulation. These findings may be due to higher rates of comorbidities, smoking and older age when compared to the prophylactic anticoagulation group. Higher rates of bleeding raises concern for the safety of treatment dose anticoagulation in these populations. Some limitations of this study include: uneven sample size between the two groups and data was collected from patients before anticoagulation dose recommendations were standardized and officially implemented. Further randomized control trials are needed to evaluate the dose- dependent relationship between anticoagulation and mortality. Our study suggests that the treatment dose anticoagulation may adversely affect the outcomes in COVID-19 patients who are older and have multiple comorbidities. Therefore, the anticoagulation dose must be chosen carefully given the overall clinical picture. [Figure: see text] DISCLOSURES: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare. American Society of Hematology 2020-11-05 2021-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8330337/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2020-142552 Text en Copyright © 2020 American Society of Hematology. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | 332.Anticoagulation and Antithrombotic Therapy Kodama, Rich Kalsi, Amardeep Singh, Angelica Vishnuvardhan, Nivetha Nimkar, Neil Paul, Sonal Usta, Soeb Ashraf, Farah Mazloom, Anita Ashfaq, Abeer Patel, Nisha Kumarasinghe, Chathula Khan, Uqba Gregos, Peter Weingarten, Jeremy Patel, Eshan Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients on Treatment Dose Anti-Coagulation Compared to Prophylactic Dose Anti-Coagulation |
title | Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients on Treatment Dose Anti-Coagulation Compared to Prophylactic Dose Anti-Coagulation |
title_full | Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients on Treatment Dose Anti-Coagulation Compared to Prophylactic Dose Anti-Coagulation |
title_fullStr | Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients on Treatment Dose Anti-Coagulation Compared to Prophylactic Dose Anti-Coagulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients on Treatment Dose Anti-Coagulation Compared to Prophylactic Dose Anti-Coagulation |
title_short | Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients on Treatment Dose Anti-Coagulation Compared to Prophylactic Dose Anti-Coagulation |
title_sort | outcomes in covid-19 patients on treatment dose anti-coagulation compared to prophylactic dose anti-coagulation |
topic | 332.Anticoagulation and Antithrombotic Therapy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8330337/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2020-142552 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kodamarich outcomesincovid19patientsontreatmentdoseanticoagulationcomparedtoprophylacticdoseanticoagulation AT kalsiamardeep outcomesincovid19patientsontreatmentdoseanticoagulationcomparedtoprophylacticdoseanticoagulation AT singhangelica outcomesincovid19patientsontreatmentdoseanticoagulationcomparedtoprophylacticdoseanticoagulation AT vishnuvardhannivetha outcomesincovid19patientsontreatmentdoseanticoagulationcomparedtoprophylacticdoseanticoagulation AT nimkarneil outcomesincovid19patientsontreatmentdoseanticoagulationcomparedtoprophylacticdoseanticoagulation AT paulsonal outcomesincovid19patientsontreatmentdoseanticoagulationcomparedtoprophylacticdoseanticoagulation AT ustasoeb outcomesincovid19patientsontreatmentdoseanticoagulationcomparedtoprophylacticdoseanticoagulation AT ashraffarah outcomesincovid19patientsontreatmentdoseanticoagulationcomparedtoprophylacticdoseanticoagulation AT mazloomanita outcomesincovid19patientsontreatmentdoseanticoagulationcomparedtoprophylacticdoseanticoagulation AT ashfaqabeer outcomesincovid19patientsontreatmentdoseanticoagulationcomparedtoprophylacticdoseanticoagulation AT patelnisha outcomesincovid19patientsontreatmentdoseanticoagulationcomparedtoprophylacticdoseanticoagulation AT kumarasinghechathula outcomesincovid19patientsontreatmentdoseanticoagulationcomparedtoprophylacticdoseanticoagulation AT khanuqba outcomesincovid19patientsontreatmentdoseanticoagulationcomparedtoprophylacticdoseanticoagulation AT gregospeter outcomesincovid19patientsontreatmentdoseanticoagulationcomparedtoprophylacticdoseanticoagulation AT weingartenjeremy outcomesincovid19patientsontreatmentdoseanticoagulationcomparedtoprophylacticdoseanticoagulation AT pateleshan outcomesincovid19patientsontreatmentdoseanticoagulationcomparedtoprophylacticdoseanticoagulation |