Cargando…
Virtual Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of IMRT Using UNet++: Classification, Gamma Passing Rates Prediction, and Dose Difference Prediction
The dose verification in radiotherapy quality assurance (QA) is time-consuming and places a heavy workload on medical physicists. To provide a clinical tool to perform patient specific QA accurately, the UNet++ is investigated to classify failed or pass fields (the GPR lower than 85% is considered “...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8330420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34354949 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.700343 |
_version_ | 1783732712517926912 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Ying Pi, Yifei Ma, Kui Miao, Xiaojuan Fu, Sichao Chen, Hua Wang, Hao Gu, Hengle Shao, Yan Duan, Yanhua Feng, Aihui Wang, Jiyong Cai, Ruxin Zhuo, Weihai Xu, Zhiyong |
author_facet | Huang, Ying Pi, Yifei Ma, Kui Miao, Xiaojuan Fu, Sichao Chen, Hua Wang, Hao Gu, Hengle Shao, Yan Duan, Yanhua Feng, Aihui Wang, Jiyong Cai, Ruxin Zhuo, Weihai Xu, Zhiyong |
author_sort | Huang, Ying |
collection | PubMed |
description | The dose verification in radiotherapy quality assurance (QA) is time-consuming and places a heavy workload on medical physicists. To provide a clinical tool to perform patient specific QA accurately, the UNet++ is investigated to classify failed or pass fields (the GPR lower than 85% is considered “failed” while the GPR higher than 85% is considered “pass”), predict gamma passing rates (GPR) for different gamma criteria, and predict dose difference from virtual patient-specific quality assurance in radiotherapy. UNet++ was trained and validated with 473 fields and tested with 95 fields. All plans used Portal Dosimetry for dose verification pre-treatment. Planar dose distribution of each field was used as the input for UNet++, with QA classification results, gamma passing rates of different gamma criteria, and dose difference were used as the output. In the test set, the accuracy of the classification model was 95.79%. The mean absolute error (MAE) were 0.82, 0.88, 2.11, 2.52, and the root mean squared error (RMSE) were 1.38, 1.57, 3.33, 3.72 for 3%/3mm, 3%/2 mm, 2%/3 mm, 2%/2 mm, respectively. The trend and position of the predicted dose difference were consistent with the measured dose difference. In conclusion, the Virtual QA based on UNet++ can be used to classify the field passed or not, predict gamma pass rate for different gamma criteria, and predict dose difference. The results show that UNet++ based Virtual QA is promising in quality assurance for radiotherapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8330420 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83304202021-08-04 Virtual Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of IMRT Using UNet++: Classification, Gamma Passing Rates Prediction, and Dose Difference Prediction Huang, Ying Pi, Yifei Ma, Kui Miao, Xiaojuan Fu, Sichao Chen, Hua Wang, Hao Gu, Hengle Shao, Yan Duan, Yanhua Feng, Aihui Wang, Jiyong Cai, Ruxin Zhuo, Weihai Xu, Zhiyong Front Oncol Oncology The dose verification in radiotherapy quality assurance (QA) is time-consuming and places a heavy workload on medical physicists. To provide a clinical tool to perform patient specific QA accurately, the UNet++ is investigated to classify failed or pass fields (the GPR lower than 85% is considered “failed” while the GPR higher than 85% is considered “pass”), predict gamma passing rates (GPR) for different gamma criteria, and predict dose difference from virtual patient-specific quality assurance in radiotherapy. UNet++ was trained and validated with 473 fields and tested with 95 fields. All plans used Portal Dosimetry for dose verification pre-treatment. Planar dose distribution of each field was used as the input for UNet++, with QA classification results, gamma passing rates of different gamma criteria, and dose difference were used as the output. In the test set, the accuracy of the classification model was 95.79%. The mean absolute error (MAE) were 0.82, 0.88, 2.11, 2.52, and the root mean squared error (RMSE) were 1.38, 1.57, 3.33, 3.72 for 3%/3mm, 3%/2 mm, 2%/3 mm, 2%/2 mm, respectively. The trend and position of the predicted dose difference were consistent with the measured dose difference. In conclusion, the Virtual QA based on UNet++ can be used to classify the field passed or not, predict gamma pass rate for different gamma criteria, and predict dose difference. The results show that UNet++ based Virtual QA is promising in quality assurance for radiotherapy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8330420/ /pubmed/34354949 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.700343 Text en Copyright © 2021 Huang, Pi, Ma, Miao, Fu, Chen, Wang, Gu, Shao, Duan, Feng, Wang, Cai, Zhuo and Xu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Huang, Ying Pi, Yifei Ma, Kui Miao, Xiaojuan Fu, Sichao Chen, Hua Wang, Hao Gu, Hengle Shao, Yan Duan, Yanhua Feng, Aihui Wang, Jiyong Cai, Ruxin Zhuo, Weihai Xu, Zhiyong Virtual Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of IMRT Using UNet++: Classification, Gamma Passing Rates Prediction, and Dose Difference Prediction |
title | Virtual Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of IMRT Using UNet++: Classification, Gamma Passing Rates Prediction, and Dose Difference Prediction |
title_full | Virtual Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of IMRT Using UNet++: Classification, Gamma Passing Rates Prediction, and Dose Difference Prediction |
title_fullStr | Virtual Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of IMRT Using UNet++: Classification, Gamma Passing Rates Prediction, and Dose Difference Prediction |
title_full_unstemmed | Virtual Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of IMRT Using UNet++: Classification, Gamma Passing Rates Prediction, and Dose Difference Prediction |
title_short | Virtual Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of IMRT Using UNet++: Classification, Gamma Passing Rates Prediction, and Dose Difference Prediction |
title_sort | virtual patient-specific quality assurance of imrt using unet++: classification, gamma passing rates prediction, and dose difference prediction |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8330420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34354949 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.700343 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangying virtualpatientspecificqualityassuranceofimrtusingunetclassificationgammapassingratespredictionanddosedifferenceprediction AT piyifei virtualpatientspecificqualityassuranceofimrtusingunetclassificationgammapassingratespredictionanddosedifferenceprediction AT makui virtualpatientspecificqualityassuranceofimrtusingunetclassificationgammapassingratespredictionanddosedifferenceprediction AT miaoxiaojuan virtualpatientspecificqualityassuranceofimrtusingunetclassificationgammapassingratespredictionanddosedifferenceprediction AT fusichao virtualpatientspecificqualityassuranceofimrtusingunetclassificationgammapassingratespredictionanddosedifferenceprediction AT chenhua virtualpatientspecificqualityassuranceofimrtusingunetclassificationgammapassingratespredictionanddosedifferenceprediction AT wanghao virtualpatientspecificqualityassuranceofimrtusingunetclassificationgammapassingratespredictionanddosedifferenceprediction AT guhengle virtualpatientspecificqualityassuranceofimrtusingunetclassificationgammapassingratespredictionanddosedifferenceprediction AT shaoyan virtualpatientspecificqualityassuranceofimrtusingunetclassificationgammapassingratespredictionanddosedifferenceprediction AT duanyanhua virtualpatientspecificqualityassuranceofimrtusingunetclassificationgammapassingratespredictionanddosedifferenceprediction AT fengaihui virtualpatientspecificqualityassuranceofimrtusingunetclassificationgammapassingratespredictionanddosedifferenceprediction AT wangjiyong virtualpatientspecificqualityassuranceofimrtusingunetclassificationgammapassingratespredictionanddosedifferenceprediction AT cairuxin virtualpatientspecificqualityassuranceofimrtusingunetclassificationgammapassingratespredictionanddosedifferenceprediction AT zhuoweihai virtualpatientspecificqualityassuranceofimrtusingunetclassificationgammapassingratespredictionanddosedifferenceprediction AT xuzhiyong virtualpatientspecificqualityassuranceofimrtusingunetclassificationgammapassingratespredictionanddosedifferenceprediction |