Cargando…

SUpporting wellbeing through PEeR-Befriending (SUPERB) feasibility trial: fidelity of peer-befriending for people with aphasia

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate systematically the fidelity of a peer-befriending intervention for people with aphasia. DESIGN: SUpporting wellbeing through Peer-befriending (SUPERB) was a feasibility randomised controlled trial comparing usual care to usual care +peer-befriending. This paper reports on the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Behn, Nicholas, Moss, Becky, McVicker, Sally, Roper, Abi, Northcott, Sarah, Marshall, Jane, Thomas, Shirley, Simpson, Alan, Flood, Chris, James, Kirsty, Goldsmith, Kimberley, Hilari, Katerina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8330561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34341046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047994
_version_ 1783732744571846656
author Behn, Nicholas
Moss, Becky
McVicker, Sally
Roper, Abi
Northcott, Sarah
Marshall, Jane
Thomas, Shirley
Simpson, Alan
Flood, Chris
James, Kirsty
Goldsmith, Kimberley
Hilari, Katerina
author_facet Behn, Nicholas
Moss, Becky
McVicker, Sally
Roper, Abi
Northcott, Sarah
Marshall, Jane
Thomas, Shirley
Simpson, Alan
Flood, Chris
James, Kirsty
Goldsmith, Kimberley
Hilari, Katerina
author_sort Behn, Nicholas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate systematically the fidelity of a peer-befriending intervention for people with aphasia. DESIGN: SUpporting wellbeing through Peer-befriending (SUPERB) was a feasibility randomised controlled trial comparing usual care to usual care +peer-befriending. This paper reports on the fidelity of all intervention aspects (training and supervision of providers/befrienders; intervention visits) which was evaluated across all areas of the Behaviour Change Consortium framework. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: People with aphasia early poststroke and low levels of distress, randomised to the intervention arm of the trial (n=28); 10 peer-befrienders at least 1-year poststroke. INTERVENTION: Peer-befrienders were trained (4–6 hours); and received regular supervision (monthly group while actively befriending, and one-to-one as and when needed) in order to provide six 1-hour peer-befriending visits over 3 months. MAIN MEASURES: Metrics included number and length of training, supervision sessions and visits. All training and supervision sessions and one (of six) visits per pair were rated against fidelity checklists and evaluated for inter-rater and intrarater reliability (Gwets AC1 agreement coefficient). Per-cent adherence to protocol was evaluated. RESULTS: All peer-befrienders received 4–6 hours training over 2–3 days as intended. There were 25 group supervision sessions with a median number attended of 14 (IQR=8–18). Twenty-six participants agreed (92.8%) to the intervention and 21 (80.8%) received all six visits (median visit length 60 min). Adherence was high for training (91.7%–100%) and supervision (83%–100%) and moderate-to-high for befriending visits (66.7%–100%). Where calculable, inter-rater and intrarater reliability was high for training and supervision (Gwets AC1 >0.90) and moderate-to-high for intervention visits (Gwets AC1 0.44–1.0). CONCLUSION: Planning of fidelity processes at the outset of the trial and monitoring throughout was feasible and ensured good-to-high fidelity for this peer-befriending intervention. The results permit confidence in other findings from the SUPERB trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02947776.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8330561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83305612021-08-20 SUpporting wellbeing through PEeR-Befriending (SUPERB) feasibility trial: fidelity of peer-befriending for people with aphasia Behn, Nicholas Moss, Becky McVicker, Sally Roper, Abi Northcott, Sarah Marshall, Jane Thomas, Shirley Simpson, Alan Flood, Chris James, Kirsty Goldsmith, Kimberley Hilari, Katerina BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine OBJECTIVE: To evaluate systematically the fidelity of a peer-befriending intervention for people with aphasia. DESIGN: SUpporting wellbeing through Peer-befriending (SUPERB) was a feasibility randomised controlled trial comparing usual care to usual care +peer-befriending. This paper reports on the fidelity of all intervention aspects (training and supervision of providers/befrienders; intervention visits) which was evaluated across all areas of the Behaviour Change Consortium framework. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: People with aphasia early poststroke and low levels of distress, randomised to the intervention arm of the trial (n=28); 10 peer-befrienders at least 1-year poststroke. INTERVENTION: Peer-befrienders were trained (4–6 hours); and received regular supervision (monthly group while actively befriending, and one-to-one as and when needed) in order to provide six 1-hour peer-befriending visits over 3 months. MAIN MEASURES: Metrics included number and length of training, supervision sessions and visits. All training and supervision sessions and one (of six) visits per pair were rated against fidelity checklists and evaluated for inter-rater and intrarater reliability (Gwets AC1 agreement coefficient). Per-cent adherence to protocol was evaluated. RESULTS: All peer-befrienders received 4–6 hours training over 2–3 days as intended. There were 25 group supervision sessions with a median number attended of 14 (IQR=8–18). Twenty-six participants agreed (92.8%) to the intervention and 21 (80.8%) received all six visits (median visit length 60 min). Adherence was high for training (91.7%–100%) and supervision (83%–100%) and moderate-to-high for befriending visits (66.7%–100%). Where calculable, inter-rater and intrarater reliability was high for training and supervision (Gwets AC1 >0.90) and moderate-to-high for intervention visits (Gwets AC1 0.44–1.0). CONCLUSION: Planning of fidelity processes at the outset of the trial and monitoring throughout was feasible and ensured good-to-high fidelity for this peer-befriending intervention. The results permit confidence in other findings from the SUPERB trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02947776. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8330561/ /pubmed/34341046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047994 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Behn, Nicholas
Moss, Becky
McVicker, Sally
Roper, Abi
Northcott, Sarah
Marshall, Jane
Thomas, Shirley
Simpson, Alan
Flood, Chris
James, Kirsty
Goldsmith, Kimberley
Hilari, Katerina
SUpporting wellbeing through PEeR-Befriending (SUPERB) feasibility trial: fidelity of peer-befriending for people with aphasia
title SUpporting wellbeing through PEeR-Befriending (SUPERB) feasibility trial: fidelity of peer-befriending for people with aphasia
title_full SUpporting wellbeing through PEeR-Befriending (SUPERB) feasibility trial: fidelity of peer-befriending for people with aphasia
title_fullStr SUpporting wellbeing through PEeR-Befriending (SUPERB) feasibility trial: fidelity of peer-befriending for people with aphasia
title_full_unstemmed SUpporting wellbeing through PEeR-Befriending (SUPERB) feasibility trial: fidelity of peer-befriending for people with aphasia
title_short SUpporting wellbeing through PEeR-Befriending (SUPERB) feasibility trial: fidelity of peer-befriending for people with aphasia
title_sort supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (superb) feasibility trial: fidelity of peer-befriending for people with aphasia
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8330561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34341046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047994
work_keys_str_mv AT behnnicholas supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbfeasibilitytrialfidelityofpeerbefriendingforpeoplewithaphasia
AT mossbecky supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbfeasibilitytrialfidelityofpeerbefriendingforpeoplewithaphasia
AT mcvickersally supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbfeasibilitytrialfidelityofpeerbefriendingforpeoplewithaphasia
AT roperabi supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbfeasibilitytrialfidelityofpeerbefriendingforpeoplewithaphasia
AT northcottsarah supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbfeasibilitytrialfidelityofpeerbefriendingforpeoplewithaphasia
AT marshalljane supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbfeasibilitytrialfidelityofpeerbefriendingforpeoplewithaphasia
AT thomasshirley supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbfeasibilitytrialfidelityofpeerbefriendingforpeoplewithaphasia
AT simpsonalan supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbfeasibilitytrialfidelityofpeerbefriendingforpeoplewithaphasia
AT floodchris supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbfeasibilitytrialfidelityofpeerbefriendingforpeoplewithaphasia
AT jameskirsty supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbfeasibilitytrialfidelityofpeerbefriendingforpeoplewithaphasia
AT goldsmithkimberley supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbfeasibilitytrialfidelityofpeerbefriendingforpeoplewithaphasia
AT hilarikaterina supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbfeasibilitytrialfidelityofpeerbefriendingforpeoplewithaphasia