Cargando…
Comparison of efficacy and safety of His-Purkinje system pacing versus cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have shown that the His-Purkinje system pacing (HPSP) can achieve electrocardiomechanical synchronisation, and thus improve cardiac function. For patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) who should be treated with pacemaker upgrade, the HPSP is a viable alterna...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8330583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34341035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045302 |
_version_ | 1783732750141882368 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Junjun Cheng, Liting Wang, Zefeng Liang, Zhuo Dong, Ruiqing Hang, Fei Chen, Jieruo Wang, Xinlu Wang, Ziyu Du, Xiao Zhang, Junmeng Wu, Yongquan |
author_facet | Chen, Junjun Cheng, Liting Wang, Zefeng Liang, Zhuo Dong, Ruiqing Hang, Fei Chen, Jieruo Wang, Xinlu Wang, Ziyu Du, Xiao Zhang, Junmeng Wu, Yongquan |
author_sort | Chen, Junjun |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have shown that the His-Purkinje system pacing (HPSP) can achieve electrocardiomechanical synchronisation, and thus improve cardiac function. For patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) who should be treated with pacemaker upgrade, the HPSP is a viable alternative to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT). However, no randomised controlled trial has been performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HPSP in patients with PICM. The present study compared the efficacy and safety of HPSP with that of traditional CRT in the treatment of patients with PICM. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a single-centre, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. This trial was carried out at the cardiac centre of Beijing Anzhen Hospital. A total of 46 patients with PICM who needed pacemaker upgrade treatment between January 2022 and December 2023 will be enrolled in this study. Patients will be randomised into an investigational group (HPSP) and a control group (CRT) at a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is the duration of QRS complex (QRS width), and the secondary outcomes are NT-proBNP (N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide), C reactive protein, the number of antibiotics used, left ventricular ejection fraction, end systolic volume, end diastolic volume, the hospitalisation duration, the incidence of postoperative infection, pacemaker parameters (threshold, sensing and impedance), the 6-minute walking test, and quality of life (36-Item Short Form Survey scale), all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, heart failure-related rehospitalisation rate, other rehospitalisation rates, major complication rates and procedure costs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Beijing Anzhen Hospital Medical Ethics Committee (No. 2020043X). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000034265). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8330583 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83305832021-08-20 Comparison of efficacy and safety of His-Purkinje system pacing versus cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial Chen, Junjun Cheng, Liting Wang, Zefeng Liang, Zhuo Dong, Ruiqing Hang, Fei Chen, Jieruo Wang, Xinlu Wang, Ziyu Du, Xiao Zhang, Junmeng Wu, Yongquan BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have shown that the His-Purkinje system pacing (HPSP) can achieve electrocardiomechanical synchronisation, and thus improve cardiac function. For patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) who should be treated with pacemaker upgrade, the HPSP is a viable alternative to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT). However, no randomised controlled trial has been performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HPSP in patients with PICM. The present study compared the efficacy and safety of HPSP with that of traditional CRT in the treatment of patients with PICM. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a single-centre, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. This trial was carried out at the cardiac centre of Beijing Anzhen Hospital. A total of 46 patients with PICM who needed pacemaker upgrade treatment between January 2022 and December 2023 will be enrolled in this study. Patients will be randomised into an investigational group (HPSP) and a control group (CRT) at a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is the duration of QRS complex (QRS width), and the secondary outcomes are NT-proBNP (N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide), C reactive protein, the number of antibiotics used, left ventricular ejection fraction, end systolic volume, end diastolic volume, the hospitalisation duration, the incidence of postoperative infection, pacemaker parameters (threshold, sensing and impedance), the 6-minute walking test, and quality of life (36-Item Short Form Survey scale), all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, heart failure-related rehospitalisation rate, other rehospitalisation rates, major complication rates and procedure costs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Beijing Anzhen Hospital Medical Ethics Committee (No. 2020043X). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000034265). BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8330583/ /pubmed/34341035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045302 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Chen, Junjun Cheng, Liting Wang, Zefeng Liang, Zhuo Dong, Ruiqing Hang, Fei Chen, Jieruo Wang, Xinlu Wang, Ziyu Du, Xiao Zhang, Junmeng Wu, Yongquan Comparison of efficacy and safety of His-Purkinje system pacing versus cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title | Comparison of efficacy and safety of His-Purkinje system pacing versus cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Comparison of efficacy and safety of His-Purkinje system pacing versus cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of efficacy and safety of His-Purkinje system pacing versus cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of efficacy and safety of His-Purkinje system pacing versus cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Comparison of efficacy and safety of His-Purkinje system pacing versus cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | comparison of efficacy and safety of his-purkinje system pacing versus cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8330583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34341035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045302 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenjunjun comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofhispurkinjesystempacingversuscardiacresynchronisationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT chengliting comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofhispurkinjesystempacingversuscardiacresynchronisationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT wangzefeng comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofhispurkinjesystempacingversuscardiacresynchronisationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT liangzhuo comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofhispurkinjesystempacingversuscardiacresynchronisationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT dongruiqing comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofhispurkinjesystempacingversuscardiacresynchronisationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hangfei comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofhispurkinjesystempacingversuscardiacresynchronisationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT chenjieruo comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofhispurkinjesystempacingversuscardiacresynchronisationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT wangxinlu comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofhispurkinjesystempacingversuscardiacresynchronisationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT wangziyu comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofhispurkinjesystempacingversuscardiacresynchronisationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT duxiao comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofhispurkinjesystempacingversuscardiacresynchronisationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT zhangjunmeng comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofhispurkinjesystempacingversuscardiacresynchronisationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT wuyongquan comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofhispurkinjesystempacingversuscardiacresynchronisationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |