Cargando…

Comparison of efficacy and safety of His-Purkinje system pacing versus cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have shown that the His-Purkinje system pacing (HPSP) can achieve electrocardiomechanical synchronisation, and thus improve cardiac function. For patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) who should be treated with pacemaker upgrade, the HPSP is a viable alterna...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Junjun, Cheng, Liting, Wang, Zefeng, Liang, Zhuo, Dong, Ruiqing, Hang, Fei, Chen, Jieruo, Wang, Xinlu, Wang, Ziyu, Du, Xiao, Zhang, Junmeng, Wu, Yongquan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8330583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34341035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045302
_version_ 1783732750141882368
author Chen, Junjun
Cheng, Liting
Wang, Zefeng
Liang, Zhuo
Dong, Ruiqing
Hang, Fei
Chen, Jieruo
Wang, Xinlu
Wang, Ziyu
Du, Xiao
Zhang, Junmeng
Wu, Yongquan
author_facet Chen, Junjun
Cheng, Liting
Wang, Zefeng
Liang, Zhuo
Dong, Ruiqing
Hang, Fei
Chen, Jieruo
Wang, Xinlu
Wang, Ziyu
Du, Xiao
Zhang, Junmeng
Wu, Yongquan
author_sort Chen, Junjun
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have shown that the His-Purkinje system pacing (HPSP) can achieve electrocardiomechanical synchronisation, and thus improve cardiac function. For patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) who should be treated with pacemaker upgrade, the HPSP is a viable alternative to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT). However, no randomised controlled trial has been performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HPSP in patients with PICM. The present study compared the efficacy and safety of HPSP with that of traditional CRT in the treatment of patients with PICM. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a single-centre, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. This trial was carried out at the cardiac centre of Beijing Anzhen Hospital. A total of 46 patients with PICM who needed pacemaker upgrade treatment between January 2022 and December 2023 will be enrolled in this study. Patients will be randomised into an investigational group (HPSP) and a control group (CRT) at a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is the duration of QRS complex (QRS width), and the secondary outcomes are NT-proBNP (N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide), C reactive protein, the number of antibiotics used, left ventricular ejection fraction, end systolic volume, end diastolic volume, the hospitalisation duration, the incidence of postoperative infection, pacemaker parameters (threshold, sensing and impedance), the 6-minute walking test, and quality of life (36-Item Short Form Survey scale), all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, heart failure-related rehospitalisation rate, other rehospitalisation rates, major complication rates and procedure costs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Beijing Anzhen Hospital Medical Ethics Committee (No. 2020043X). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000034265).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8330583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83305832021-08-20 Comparison of efficacy and safety of His-Purkinje system pacing versus cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial Chen, Junjun Cheng, Liting Wang, Zefeng Liang, Zhuo Dong, Ruiqing Hang, Fei Chen, Jieruo Wang, Xinlu Wang, Ziyu Du, Xiao Zhang, Junmeng Wu, Yongquan BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have shown that the His-Purkinje system pacing (HPSP) can achieve electrocardiomechanical synchronisation, and thus improve cardiac function. For patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) who should be treated with pacemaker upgrade, the HPSP is a viable alternative to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT). However, no randomised controlled trial has been performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HPSP in patients with PICM. The present study compared the efficacy and safety of HPSP with that of traditional CRT in the treatment of patients with PICM. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a single-centre, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. This trial was carried out at the cardiac centre of Beijing Anzhen Hospital. A total of 46 patients with PICM who needed pacemaker upgrade treatment between January 2022 and December 2023 will be enrolled in this study. Patients will be randomised into an investigational group (HPSP) and a control group (CRT) at a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is the duration of QRS complex (QRS width), and the secondary outcomes are NT-proBNP (N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide), C reactive protein, the number of antibiotics used, left ventricular ejection fraction, end systolic volume, end diastolic volume, the hospitalisation duration, the incidence of postoperative infection, pacemaker parameters (threshold, sensing and impedance), the 6-minute walking test, and quality of life (36-Item Short Form Survey scale), all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, heart failure-related rehospitalisation rate, other rehospitalisation rates, major complication rates and procedure costs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Beijing Anzhen Hospital Medical Ethics Committee (No. 2020043X). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000034265). BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8330583/ /pubmed/34341035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045302 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Chen, Junjun
Cheng, Liting
Wang, Zefeng
Liang, Zhuo
Dong, Ruiqing
Hang, Fei
Chen, Jieruo
Wang, Xinlu
Wang, Ziyu
Du, Xiao
Zhang, Junmeng
Wu, Yongquan
Comparison of efficacy and safety of His-Purkinje system pacing versus cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title Comparison of efficacy and safety of His-Purkinje system pacing versus cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Comparison of efficacy and safety of His-Purkinje system pacing versus cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of efficacy and safety of His-Purkinje system pacing versus cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of efficacy and safety of His-Purkinje system pacing versus cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short Comparison of efficacy and safety of His-Purkinje system pacing versus cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort comparison of efficacy and safety of his-purkinje system pacing versus cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8330583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34341035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045302
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjunjun comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofhispurkinjesystempacingversuscardiacresynchronisationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT chengliting comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofhispurkinjesystempacingversuscardiacresynchronisationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wangzefeng comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofhispurkinjesystempacingversuscardiacresynchronisationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT liangzhuo comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofhispurkinjesystempacingversuscardiacresynchronisationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dongruiqing comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofhispurkinjesystempacingversuscardiacresynchronisationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hangfei comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofhispurkinjesystempacingversuscardiacresynchronisationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT chenjieruo comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofhispurkinjesystempacingversuscardiacresynchronisationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wangxinlu comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofhispurkinjesystempacingversuscardiacresynchronisationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wangziyu comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofhispurkinjesystempacingversuscardiacresynchronisationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT duxiao comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofhispurkinjesystempacingversuscardiacresynchronisationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zhangjunmeng comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofhispurkinjesystempacingversuscardiacresynchronisationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wuyongquan comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofhispurkinjesystempacingversuscardiacresynchronisationtherapyinpatientswithpacinginducedcardiomyopathyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial