Cargando…

New Approach Methodology for Assessing Inhalation Risks of a Contact Respiratory Cytotoxicant: Computational Fluid Dynamics-Based Aerosol Dosimetry Modeling for Cross-Species and In Vitro Comparisons

Regulatory agencies are considering alternative approaches to assessing inhalation toxicity that utilizes in vitro studies with human cells and in silico modeling in lieu of additional animal studies. In support of this goal, computational fluid-particle dynamics models were developed to estimate si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Corley, Richard A, Kuprat, Andrew P, Suffield, Sarah R, Kabilan, Senthil, Hinderliter, Paul M, Yugulis, Kevin, Ramanarayanan, Tharacad S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8331159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34077545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfab062
_version_ 1783732863024234496
author Corley, Richard A
Kuprat, Andrew P
Suffield, Sarah R
Kabilan, Senthil
Hinderliter, Paul M
Yugulis, Kevin
Ramanarayanan, Tharacad S
author_facet Corley, Richard A
Kuprat, Andrew P
Suffield, Sarah R
Kabilan, Senthil
Hinderliter, Paul M
Yugulis, Kevin
Ramanarayanan, Tharacad S
author_sort Corley, Richard A
collection PubMed
description Regulatory agencies are considering alternative approaches to assessing inhalation toxicity that utilizes in vitro studies with human cells and in silico modeling in lieu of additional animal studies. In support of this goal, computational fluid-particle dynamics models were developed to estimate site-specific deposition of inhaled aerosols containing the fungicide, chlorothalonil, in the rat and human for comparisons to prior rat inhalation studies and new human in vitro studies. Under bioassay conditions, the deposition was predicted to be greatest at the front of the rat nose followed by the anterior transitional epithelium and larynx corresponding to regions most sensitive to local contact irritation and cytotoxicity. For humans, simulations of aerosol deposition covering potential occupational or residential exposures (1–50 µm diameter) were conducted using nasal and oral breathing. Aerosols in the 1–5 µm range readily penetrated the deep region of the human lung following both oral and nasal breathing. Under actual use conditions (aerosol formulations >10 µm), the majority of deposited doses were in the upper conducting airways. Beyond the nose or mouth, the greatest deposition in the pharynx, larynx, trachea, and bronchi was predicted for aerosols in the 10–20 µm size range. Only small amounts of aerosols >20 µm penetrated past the pharyngeal region. Using the ICRP clearance model, local retained tissue dose metrics including maximal concentrations and areas under the curve were calculated for each airway region following repeated occupational exposures. These results are directly comparable with benchmark doses from in vitro toxicity studies in human cells leading to estimated human equivalent concentrations that reduce the reliance on animals for risk assessments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8331159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83311592021-08-04 New Approach Methodology for Assessing Inhalation Risks of a Contact Respiratory Cytotoxicant: Computational Fluid Dynamics-Based Aerosol Dosimetry Modeling for Cross-Species and In Vitro Comparisons Corley, Richard A Kuprat, Andrew P Suffield, Sarah R Kabilan, Senthil Hinderliter, Paul M Yugulis, Kevin Ramanarayanan, Tharacad S Toxicol Sci Emerging Technologies, Methods, and Models Regulatory agencies are considering alternative approaches to assessing inhalation toxicity that utilizes in vitro studies with human cells and in silico modeling in lieu of additional animal studies. In support of this goal, computational fluid-particle dynamics models were developed to estimate site-specific deposition of inhaled aerosols containing the fungicide, chlorothalonil, in the rat and human for comparisons to prior rat inhalation studies and new human in vitro studies. Under bioassay conditions, the deposition was predicted to be greatest at the front of the rat nose followed by the anterior transitional epithelium and larynx corresponding to regions most sensitive to local contact irritation and cytotoxicity. For humans, simulations of aerosol deposition covering potential occupational or residential exposures (1–50 µm diameter) were conducted using nasal and oral breathing. Aerosols in the 1–5 µm range readily penetrated the deep region of the human lung following both oral and nasal breathing. Under actual use conditions (aerosol formulations >10 µm), the majority of deposited doses were in the upper conducting airways. Beyond the nose or mouth, the greatest deposition in the pharynx, larynx, trachea, and bronchi was predicted for aerosols in the 10–20 µm size range. Only small amounts of aerosols >20 µm penetrated past the pharyngeal region. Using the ICRP clearance model, local retained tissue dose metrics including maximal concentrations and areas under the curve were calculated for each airway region following repeated occupational exposures. These results are directly comparable with benchmark doses from in vitro toxicity studies in human cells leading to estimated human equivalent concentrations that reduce the reliance on animals for risk assessments. Oxford University Press 2021-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8331159/ /pubmed/34077545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfab062 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Emerging Technologies, Methods, and Models
Corley, Richard A
Kuprat, Andrew P
Suffield, Sarah R
Kabilan, Senthil
Hinderliter, Paul M
Yugulis, Kevin
Ramanarayanan, Tharacad S
New Approach Methodology for Assessing Inhalation Risks of a Contact Respiratory Cytotoxicant: Computational Fluid Dynamics-Based Aerosol Dosimetry Modeling for Cross-Species and In Vitro Comparisons
title New Approach Methodology for Assessing Inhalation Risks of a Contact Respiratory Cytotoxicant: Computational Fluid Dynamics-Based Aerosol Dosimetry Modeling for Cross-Species and In Vitro Comparisons
title_full New Approach Methodology for Assessing Inhalation Risks of a Contact Respiratory Cytotoxicant: Computational Fluid Dynamics-Based Aerosol Dosimetry Modeling for Cross-Species and In Vitro Comparisons
title_fullStr New Approach Methodology for Assessing Inhalation Risks of a Contact Respiratory Cytotoxicant: Computational Fluid Dynamics-Based Aerosol Dosimetry Modeling for Cross-Species and In Vitro Comparisons
title_full_unstemmed New Approach Methodology for Assessing Inhalation Risks of a Contact Respiratory Cytotoxicant: Computational Fluid Dynamics-Based Aerosol Dosimetry Modeling for Cross-Species and In Vitro Comparisons
title_short New Approach Methodology for Assessing Inhalation Risks of a Contact Respiratory Cytotoxicant: Computational Fluid Dynamics-Based Aerosol Dosimetry Modeling for Cross-Species and In Vitro Comparisons
title_sort new approach methodology for assessing inhalation risks of a contact respiratory cytotoxicant: computational fluid dynamics-based aerosol dosimetry modeling for cross-species and in vitro comparisons
topic Emerging Technologies, Methods, and Models
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8331159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34077545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfab062
work_keys_str_mv AT corleyricharda newapproachmethodologyforassessinginhalationrisksofacontactrespiratorycytotoxicantcomputationalfluiddynamicsbasedaerosoldosimetrymodelingforcrossspeciesandinvitrocomparisons
AT kupratandrewp newapproachmethodologyforassessinginhalationrisksofacontactrespiratorycytotoxicantcomputationalfluiddynamicsbasedaerosoldosimetrymodelingforcrossspeciesandinvitrocomparisons
AT suffieldsarahr newapproachmethodologyforassessinginhalationrisksofacontactrespiratorycytotoxicantcomputationalfluiddynamicsbasedaerosoldosimetrymodelingforcrossspeciesandinvitrocomparisons
AT kabilansenthil newapproachmethodologyforassessinginhalationrisksofacontactrespiratorycytotoxicantcomputationalfluiddynamicsbasedaerosoldosimetrymodelingforcrossspeciesandinvitrocomparisons
AT hinderliterpaulm newapproachmethodologyforassessinginhalationrisksofacontactrespiratorycytotoxicantcomputationalfluiddynamicsbasedaerosoldosimetrymodelingforcrossspeciesandinvitrocomparisons
AT yuguliskevin newapproachmethodologyforassessinginhalationrisksofacontactrespiratorycytotoxicantcomputationalfluiddynamicsbasedaerosoldosimetrymodelingforcrossspeciesandinvitrocomparisons
AT ramanarayanantharacads newapproachmethodologyforassessinginhalationrisksofacontactrespiratorycytotoxicantcomputationalfluiddynamicsbasedaerosoldosimetrymodelingforcrossspeciesandinvitrocomparisons