Cargando…

Combined transabdominal and transperineal endoscopic pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: feasibility and safety of a two-team approach

PURPOSE: Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a highly invasive procedure with high morbidity and mortality rates. Promising options to reduce this invasiveness have included laparoscopic and transperineal approaches. The aim of this study was to identify the safety of combined transabdominal and transperine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tominaga, Tetsuro, Nonaka, Takashi, Fukuda, Akiko, Shiraisi, Toshio, Hashimoto, Shintaro, Araki, Masato, Sumida, Yorihisa, Sawai, Terumitsu, Nagayasu, Takeshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Surgical Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8331559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34386459
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2021.101.2.102
_version_ 1783732905129803776
author Tominaga, Tetsuro
Nonaka, Takashi
Fukuda, Akiko
Shiraisi, Toshio
Hashimoto, Shintaro
Araki, Masato
Sumida, Yorihisa
Sawai, Terumitsu
Nagayasu, Takeshi
author_facet Tominaga, Tetsuro
Nonaka, Takashi
Fukuda, Akiko
Shiraisi, Toshio
Hashimoto, Shintaro
Araki, Masato
Sumida, Yorihisa
Sawai, Terumitsu
Nagayasu, Takeshi
author_sort Tominaga, Tetsuro
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a highly invasive procedure with high morbidity and mortality rates. Promising options to reduce this invasiveness have included laparoscopic and transperineal approaches. The aim of this study was to identify the safety of combined transabdominal and transperineal endoscopic PE for colorectal malignancies. METHODS: Fourteen patients who underwent combined transabdominal and transperineal PE (T group: 2-team approach, n = 7; O group: 1-team approach, n = 7) for colorectal malignancies between April 2016 and March 2020 in our institutions were included in this study. Clinicopathological features and perioperative outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: All patients successfully underwent R0 resection. Operation time tended to be shorter in the T group (463 minutes) than in the O group (636 minutes, P = 0.080). Time to specimen removal was significantly shorter (258 minutes vs. 423 minutes, P = 0.006), blood loss was lower (343 mL vs. 867 mL, P = 0.042), and volume of blood transfusion was less (0 mL vs. 560 mL, P = 0.063) in the T group, respectively. Postoperative complications were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Combined transabdominal and transperineal PE under a synchronous 2-team approach was feasible and safe, with the potential to reduce operation time, blood loss, and surgeon stress.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8331559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Korean Surgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83315592021-08-11 Combined transabdominal and transperineal endoscopic pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: feasibility and safety of a two-team approach Tominaga, Tetsuro Nonaka, Takashi Fukuda, Akiko Shiraisi, Toshio Hashimoto, Shintaro Araki, Masato Sumida, Yorihisa Sawai, Terumitsu Nagayasu, Takeshi Ann Surg Treat Res Original Article PURPOSE: Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a highly invasive procedure with high morbidity and mortality rates. Promising options to reduce this invasiveness have included laparoscopic and transperineal approaches. The aim of this study was to identify the safety of combined transabdominal and transperineal endoscopic PE for colorectal malignancies. METHODS: Fourteen patients who underwent combined transabdominal and transperineal PE (T group: 2-team approach, n = 7; O group: 1-team approach, n = 7) for colorectal malignancies between April 2016 and March 2020 in our institutions were included in this study. Clinicopathological features and perioperative outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: All patients successfully underwent R0 resection. Operation time tended to be shorter in the T group (463 minutes) than in the O group (636 minutes, P = 0.080). Time to specimen removal was significantly shorter (258 minutes vs. 423 minutes, P = 0.006), blood loss was lower (343 mL vs. 867 mL, P = 0.042), and volume of blood transfusion was less (0 mL vs. 560 mL, P = 0.063) in the T group, respectively. Postoperative complications were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Combined transabdominal and transperineal PE under a synchronous 2-team approach was feasible and safe, with the potential to reduce operation time, blood loss, and surgeon stress. The Korean Surgical Society 2021-08 2021-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8331559/ /pubmed/34386459 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2021.101.2.102 Text en Copyright © 2021, the Korean Surgical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tominaga, Tetsuro
Nonaka, Takashi
Fukuda, Akiko
Shiraisi, Toshio
Hashimoto, Shintaro
Araki, Masato
Sumida, Yorihisa
Sawai, Terumitsu
Nagayasu, Takeshi
Combined transabdominal and transperineal endoscopic pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: feasibility and safety of a two-team approach
title Combined transabdominal and transperineal endoscopic pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: feasibility and safety of a two-team approach
title_full Combined transabdominal and transperineal endoscopic pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: feasibility and safety of a two-team approach
title_fullStr Combined transabdominal and transperineal endoscopic pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: feasibility and safety of a two-team approach
title_full_unstemmed Combined transabdominal and transperineal endoscopic pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: feasibility and safety of a two-team approach
title_short Combined transabdominal and transperineal endoscopic pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: feasibility and safety of a two-team approach
title_sort combined transabdominal and transperineal endoscopic pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: feasibility and safety of a two-team approach
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8331559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34386459
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2021.101.2.102
work_keys_str_mv AT tominagatetsuro combinedtransabdominalandtransperinealendoscopicpelvicexenterationforcolorectalcancerfeasibilityandsafetyofatwoteamapproach
AT nonakatakashi combinedtransabdominalandtransperinealendoscopicpelvicexenterationforcolorectalcancerfeasibilityandsafetyofatwoteamapproach
AT fukudaakiko combinedtransabdominalandtransperinealendoscopicpelvicexenterationforcolorectalcancerfeasibilityandsafetyofatwoteamapproach
AT shiraisitoshio combinedtransabdominalandtransperinealendoscopicpelvicexenterationforcolorectalcancerfeasibilityandsafetyofatwoteamapproach
AT hashimotoshintaro combinedtransabdominalandtransperinealendoscopicpelvicexenterationforcolorectalcancerfeasibilityandsafetyofatwoteamapproach
AT arakimasato combinedtransabdominalandtransperinealendoscopicpelvicexenterationforcolorectalcancerfeasibilityandsafetyofatwoteamapproach
AT sumidayorihisa combinedtransabdominalandtransperinealendoscopicpelvicexenterationforcolorectalcancerfeasibilityandsafetyofatwoteamapproach
AT sawaiterumitsu combinedtransabdominalandtransperinealendoscopicpelvicexenterationforcolorectalcancerfeasibilityandsafetyofatwoteamapproach
AT nagayasutakeshi combinedtransabdominalandtransperinealendoscopicpelvicexenterationforcolorectalcancerfeasibilityandsafetyofatwoteamapproach