Cargando…
Combined transabdominal and transperineal endoscopic pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: feasibility and safety of a two-team approach
PURPOSE: Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a highly invasive procedure with high morbidity and mortality rates. Promising options to reduce this invasiveness have included laparoscopic and transperineal approaches. The aim of this study was to identify the safety of combined transabdominal and transperine...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Surgical Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8331559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34386459 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2021.101.2.102 |
_version_ | 1783732905129803776 |
---|---|
author | Tominaga, Tetsuro Nonaka, Takashi Fukuda, Akiko Shiraisi, Toshio Hashimoto, Shintaro Araki, Masato Sumida, Yorihisa Sawai, Terumitsu Nagayasu, Takeshi |
author_facet | Tominaga, Tetsuro Nonaka, Takashi Fukuda, Akiko Shiraisi, Toshio Hashimoto, Shintaro Araki, Masato Sumida, Yorihisa Sawai, Terumitsu Nagayasu, Takeshi |
author_sort | Tominaga, Tetsuro |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a highly invasive procedure with high morbidity and mortality rates. Promising options to reduce this invasiveness have included laparoscopic and transperineal approaches. The aim of this study was to identify the safety of combined transabdominal and transperineal endoscopic PE for colorectal malignancies. METHODS: Fourteen patients who underwent combined transabdominal and transperineal PE (T group: 2-team approach, n = 7; O group: 1-team approach, n = 7) for colorectal malignancies between April 2016 and March 2020 in our institutions were included in this study. Clinicopathological features and perioperative outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: All patients successfully underwent R0 resection. Operation time tended to be shorter in the T group (463 minutes) than in the O group (636 minutes, P = 0.080). Time to specimen removal was significantly shorter (258 minutes vs. 423 minutes, P = 0.006), blood loss was lower (343 mL vs. 867 mL, P = 0.042), and volume of blood transfusion was less (0 mL vs. 560 mL, P = 0.063) in the T group, respectively. Postoperative complications were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Combined transabdominal and transperineal PE under a synchronous 2-team approach was feasible and safe, with the potential to reduce operation time, blood loss, and surgeon stress. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8331559 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Korean Surgical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83315592021-08-11 Combined transabdominal and transperineal endoscopic pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: feasibility and safety of a two-team approach Tominaga, Tetsuro Nonaka, Takashi Fukuda, Akiko Shiraisi, Toshio Hashimoto, Shintaro Araki, Masato Sumida, Yorihisa Sawai, Terumitsu Nagayasu, Takeshi Ann Surg Treat Res Original Article PURPOSE: Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a highly invasive procedure with high morbidity and mortality rates. Promising options to reduce this invasiveness have included laparoscopic and transperineal approaches. The aim of this study was to identify the safety of combined transabdominal and transperineal endoscopic PE for colorectal malignancies. METHODS: Fourteen patients who underwent combined transabdominal and transperineal PE (T group: 2-team approach, n = 7; O group: 1-team approach, n = 7) for colorectal malignancies between April 2016 and March 2020 in our institutions were included in this study. Clinicopathological features and perioperative outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: All patients successfully underwent R0 resection. Operation time tended to be shorter in the T group (463 minutes) than in the O group (636 minutes, P = 0.080). Time to specimen removal was significantly shorter (258 minutes vs. 423 minutes, P = 0.006), blood loss was lower (343 mL vs. 867 mL, P = 0.042), and volume of blood transfusion was less (0 mL vs. 560 mL, P = 0.063) in the T group, respectively. Postoperative complications were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Combined transabdominal and transperineal PE under a synchronous 2-team approach was feasible and safe, with the potential to reduce operation time, blood loss, and surgeon stress. The Korean Surgical Society 2021-08 2021-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8331559/ /pubmed/34386459 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2021.101.2.102 Text en Copyright © 2021, the Korean Surgical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Tominaga, Tetsuro Nonaka, Takashi Fukuda, Akiko Shiraisi, Toshio Hashimoto, Shintaro Araki, Masato Sumida, Yorihisa Sawai, Terumitsu Nagayasu, Takeshi Combined transabdominal and transperineal endoscopic pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: feasibility and safety of a two-team approach |
title | Combined transabdominal and transperineal endoscopic pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: feasibility and safety of a two-team approach |
title_full | Combined transabdominal and transperineal endoscopic pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: feasibility and safety of a two-team approach |
title_fullStr | Combined transabdominal and transperineal endoscopic pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: feasibility and safety of a two-team approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Combined transabdominal and transperineal endoscopic pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: feasibility and safety of a two-team approach |
title_short | Combined transabdominal and transperineal endoscopic pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: feasibility and safety of a two-team approach |
title_sort | combined transabdominal and transperineal endoscopic pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: feasibility and safety of a two-team approach |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8331559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34386459 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2021.101.2.102 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tominagatetsuro combinedtransabdominalandtransperinealendoscopicpelvicexenterationforcolorectalcancerfeasibilityandsafetyofatwoteamapproach AT nonakatakashi combinedtransabdominalandtransperinealendoscopicpelvicexenterationforcolorectalcancerfeasibilityandsafetyofatwoteamapproach AT fukudaakiko combinedtransabdominalandtransperinealendoscopicpelvicexenterationforcolorectalcancerfeasibilityandsafetyofatwoteamapproach AT shiraisitoshio combinedtransabdominalandtransperinealendoscopicpelvicexenterationforcolorectalcancerfeasibilityandsafetyofatwoteamapproach AT hashimotoshintaro combinedtransabdominalandtransperinealendoscopicpelvicexenterationforcolorectalcancerfeasibilityandsafetyofatwoteamapproach AT arakimasato combinedtransabdominalandtransperinealendoscopicpelvicexenterationforcolorectalcancerfeasibilityandsafetyofatwoteamapproach AT sumidayorihisa combinedtransabdominalandtransperinealendoscopicpelvicexenterationforcolorectalcancerfeasibilityandsafetyofatwoteamapproach AT sawaiterumitsu combinedtransabdominalandtransperinealendoscopicpelvicexenterationforcolorectalcancerfeasibilityandsafetyofatwoteamapproach AT nagayasutakeshi combinedtransabdominalandtransperinealendoscopicpelvicexenterationforcolorectalcancerfeasibilityandsafetyofatwoteamapproach |