Cargando…
Investigator Initiated Clinical Trials (IICTs): A Systematic Search in Registries to Compare the Czech Republic and Portugal in Terms of Funding Policies and Scientific Outcomes
OBJECTIVES: Clinical trials provide one of the highest levels of evidence to support medical practice. Investigator initiated clinical trials (IICTs) answer relevant questions in clinical practice that may not be addressed by industry. For the first time, two European Countries are compared in terms...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8332583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34003473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43441-021-00293-w |
_version_ | 1783732921066061824 |
---|---|
author | Madeira, C. Hořavová, L. dos Santos, F. Batuca, J. R. Nebeska, K. Součková, L. Kubiak, C. Demotes, J. Demlová, R. Monteiro, E. C. |
author_facet | Madeira, C. Hořavová, L. dos Santos, F. Batuca, J. R. Nebeska, K. Součková, L. Kubiak, C. Demotes, J. Demlová, R. Monteiro, E. C. |
author_sort | Madeira, C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Clinical trials provide one of the highest levels of evidence to support medical practice. Investigator initiated clinical trials (IICTs) answer relevant questions in clinical practice that may not be addressed by industry. For the first time, two European Countries are compared in terms of IICTs, respective funders and publications, envisaging to inspire others to use similar indicators to assess clinical research outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective systematic search of registered IICTs from 2004 to 2017, using four clinical trials registries was carried out in two European countries with similar population, GDP, HDI and medical schools but with different governmental models to fund clinical research. Each IICT was screened for sponsors, funders, type of intervention and associated publications, once completed. RESULTS: IICTs involving the Czech Republic and Portugal were n = 439 (42% with hospitals as sponsors) and n = 328 (47% with universities as sponsors), respectively. The Czech Republic and Portuguese funding agencies supported respectively 61 and 27 IICTs. Among these, trials with medicinal products represent 52% in Czech Republic and 4% in Portugal. In the first, a higher percentage of IICTs’ publications in high impact factor journals with national investigators as authors was observed, when compared to Portugal (75% vs 15%). CONCLUSION: The better performance in clinical research by Czech Republic might be related to the existence of specific and periodic funding for clinical research, although further data are still needed to confirm this relationship. In upcoming years, the indicators used herein might be useful to tracking clinical research outcomes in these and other European countries. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43441-021-00293-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8332583 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83325832021-08-20 Investigator Initiated Clinical Trials (IICTs): A Systematic Search in Registries to Compare the Czech Republic and Portugal in Terms of Funding Policies and Scientific Outcomes Madeira, C. Hořavová, L. dos Santos, F. Batuca, J. R. Nebeska, K. Součková, L. Kubiak, C. Demotes, J. Demlová, R. Monteiro, E. C. Ther Innov Regul Sci Original Research OBJECTIVES: Clinical trials provide one of the highest levels of evidence to support medical practice. Investigator initiated clinical trials (IICTs) answer relevant questions in clinical practice that may not be addressed by industry. For the first time, two European Countries are compared in terms of IICTs, respective funders and publications, envisaging to inspire others to use similar indicators to assess clinical research outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective systematic search of registered IICTs from 2004 to 2017, using four clinical trials registries was carried out in two European countries with similar population, GDP, HDI and medical schools but with different governmental models to fund clinical research. Each IICT was screened for sponsors, funders, type of intervention and associated publications, once completed. RESULTS: IICTs involving the Czech Republic and Portugal were n = 439 (42% with hospitals as sponsors) and n = 328 (47% with universities as sponsors), respectively. The Czech Republic and Portuguese funding agencies supported respectively 61 and 27 IICTs. Among these, trials with medicinal products represent 52% in Czech Republic and 4% in Portugal. In the first, a higher percentage of IICTs’ publications in high impact factor journals with national investigators as authors was observed, when compared to Portugal (75% vs 15%). CONCLUSION: The better performance in clinical research by Czech Republic might be related to the existence of specific and periodic funding for clinical research, although further data are still needed to confirm this relationship. In upcoming years, the indicators used herein might be useful to tracking clinical research outcomes in these and other European countries. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43441-021-00293-w. Springer International Publishing 2021-05-18 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8332583/ /pubmed/34003473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43441-021-00293-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Madeira, C. Hořavová, L. dos Santos, F. Batuca, J. R. Nebeska, K. Součková, L. Kubiak, C. Demotes, J. Demlová, R. Monteiro, E. C. Investigator Initiated Clinical Trials (IICTs): A Systematic Search in Registries to Compare the Czech Republic and Portugal in Terms of Funding Policies and Scientific Outcomes |
title | Investigator Initiated Clinical Trials (IICTs): A Systematic Search in Registries to Compare the Czech Republic and Portugal in Terms of Funding Policies and Scientific Outcomes |
title_full | Investigator Initiated Clinical Trials (IICTs): A Systematic Search in Registries to Compare the Czech Republic and Portugal in Terms of Funding Policies and Scientific Outcomes |
title_fullStr | Investigator Initiated Clinical Trials (IICTs): A Systematic Search in Registries to Compare the Czech Republic and Portugal in Terms of Funding Policies and Scientific Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Investigator Initiated Clinical Trials (IICTs): A Systematic Search in Registries to Compare the Czech Republic and Portugal in Terms of Funding Policies and Scientific Outcomes |
title_short | Investigator Initiated Clinical Trials (IICTs): A Systematic Search in Registries to Compare the Czech Republic and Portugal in Terms of Funding Policies and Scientific Outcomes |
title_sort | investigator initiated clinical trials (iicts): a systematic search in registries to compare the czech republic and portugal in terms of funding policies and scientific outcomes |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8332583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34003473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43441-021-00293-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT madeirac investigatorinitiatedclinicaltrialsiictsasystematicsearchinregistriestocomparetheczechrepublicandportugalintermsoffundingpoliciesandscientificoutcomes AT horavoval investigatorinitiatedclinicaltrialsiictsasystematicsearchinregistriestocomparetheczechrepublicandportugalintermsoffundingpoliciesandscientificoutcomes AT dossantosf investigatorinitiatedclinicaltrialsiictsasystematicsearchinregistriestocomparetheczechrepublicandportugalintermsoffundingpoliciesandscientificoutcomes AT batucajr investigatorinitiatedclinicaltrialsiictsasystematicsearchinregistriestocomparetheczechrepublicandportugalintermsoffundingpoliciesandscientificoutcomes AT nebeskak investigatorinitiatedclinicaltrialsiictsasystematicsearchinregistriestocomparetheczechrepublicandportugalintermsoffundingpoliciesandscientificoutcomes AT souckoval investigatorinitiatedclinicaltrialsiictsasystematicsearchinregistriestocomparetheczechrepublicandportugalintermsoffundingpoliciesandscientificoutcomes AT kubiakc investigatorinitiatedclinicaltrialsiictsasystematicsearchinregistriestocomparetheczechrepublicandportugalintermsoffundingpoliciesandscientificoutcomes AT demotesj investigatorinitiatedclinicaltrialsiictsasystematicsearchinregistriestocomparetheczechrepublicandportugalintermsoffundingpoliciesandscientificoutcomes AT demlovar investigatorinitiatedclinicaltrialsiictsasystematicsearchinregistriestocomparetheczechrepublicandportugalintermsoffundingpoliciesandscientificoutcomes AT monteiroec investigatorinitiatedclinicaltrialsiictsasystematicsearchinregistriestocomparetheczechrepublicandportugalintermsoffundingpoliciesandscientificoutcomes |