Cargando…
Ultrasound in augmented reality: a mixed-methods evaluation of head-mounted displays in image-guided interventions
PURPOSE: Augmented reality (AR) and head-mounted displays (HMD) in medical practice are current research topics. A commonly proposed use case of AR-HMDs is to display data in image-guided interventions. Although technical feasibility has been thoroughly shown, effects of AR-HMDs on interventions are...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8332636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32725398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02236-6 |
_version_ | 1783732926250221568 |
---|---|
author | Rüger, Christoph Feufel, Markus A. Moosburner, Simon Özbek, Christopher Pratschke, Johann Sauer, Igor M. |
author_facet | Rüger, Christoph Feufel, Markus A. Moosburner, Simon Özbek, Christopher Pratschke, Johann Sauer, Igor M. |
author_sort | Rüger, Christoph |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Augmented reality (AR) and head-mounted displays (HMD) in medical practice are current research topics. A commonly proposed use case of AR-HMDs is to display data in image-guided interventions. Although technical feasibility has been thoroughly shown, effects of AR-HMDs on interventions are not yet well researched, hampering clinical applicability. Therefore, the goal of this study is to better understand the benefits and limitations of this technology in ultrasound-guided interventions. METHODS: We used an AR-HMD system (based on the first-generation Microsoft Hololens) which overlays live ultrasound images spatially correctly at the location of the ultrasound transducer. We chose ultrasound-guided needle placements as a representative task for image-guided interventions. To examine the effects of the AR-HMD, we used mixed methods and conducted two studies in a lab setting: (1) In a randomized crossover study, we asked participants to place needles into a training model and evaluated task duration and accuracy with the AR-HMD as compared to the standard procedure without visual overlay and (2) in a qualitative study, we analyzed the user experience with AR-HMD using think-aloud protocols during ultrasound examinations and semi-structured interviews after the task. RESULTS: Participants (n = 20) placed needles more accurately (mean error of 7.4 mm vs. 4.9 mm, p = 0.022) but not significantly faster (mean task duration of 74.4 s vs. 66.4 s, p = 0.211) with the AR-HMD. All participants in the qualitative study (n = 6) reported limitations of and unfamiliarity with the AR-HMD, yet all but one also clearly noted benefits and/or that they would like to test the technology in practice. CONCLUSION: We present additional, though still preliminary, evidence that AR-HMDs provide benefits in image-guided procedures. Our data also contribute insights into potential causes underlying the benefits, such as improved spatial perception. Still, more comprehensive studies are needed to ascertain benefits for clinical applications and to clarify mechanisms underlying these benefits. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11548-020-02236-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8332636 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83326362021-08-20 Ultrasound in augmented reality: a mixed-methods evaluation of head-mounted displays in image-guided interventions Rüger, Christoph Feufel, Markus A. Moosburner, Simon Özbek, Christopher Pratschke, Johann Sauer, Igor M. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Augmented reality (AR) and head-mounted displays (HMD) in medical practice are current research topics. A commonly proposed use case of AR-HMDs is to display data in image-guided interventions. Although technical feasibility has been thoroughly shown, effects of AR-HMDs on interventions are not yet well researched, hampering clinical applicability. Therefore, the goal of this study is to better understand the benefits and limitations of this technology in ultrasound-guided interventions. METHODS: We used an AR-HMD system (based on the first-generation Microsoft Hololens) which overlays live ultrasound images spatially correctly at the location of the ultrasound transducer. We chose ultrasound-guided needle placements as a representative task for image-guided interventions. To examine the effects of the AR-HMD, we used mixed methods and conducted two studies in a lab setting: (1) In a randomized crossover study, we asked participants to place needles into a training model and evaluated task duration and accuracy with the AR-HMD as compared to the standard procedure without visual overlay and (2) in a qualitative study, we analyzed the user experience with AR-HMD using think-aloud protocols during ultrasound examinations and semi-structured interviews after the task. RESULTS: Participants (n = 20) placed needles more accurately (mean error of 7.4 mm vs. 4.9 mm, p = 0.022) but not significantly faster (mean task duration of 74.4 s vs. 66.4 s, p = 0.211) with the AR-HMD. All participants in the qualitative study (n = 6) reported limitations of and unfamiliarity with the AR-HMD, yet all but one also clearly noted benefits and/or that they would like to test the technology in practice. CONCLUSION: We present additional, though still preliminary, evidence that AR-HMDs provide benefits in image-guided procedures. Our data also contribute insights into potential causes underlying the benefits, such as improved spatial perception. Still, more comprehensive studies are needed to ascertain benefits for clinical applications and to clarify mechanisms underlying these benefits. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11548-020-02236-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-07-28 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC8332636/ /pubmed/32725398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02236-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rüger, Christoph Feufel, Markus A. Moosburner, Simon Özbek, Christopher Pratschke, Johann Sauer, Igor M. Ultrasound in augmented reality: a mixed-methods evaluation of head-mounted displays in image-guided interventions |
title | Ultrasound in augmented reality: a mixed-methods evaluation of head-mounted displays in image-guided interventions |
title_full | Ultrasound in augmented reality: a mixed-methods evaluation of head-mounted displays in image-guided interventions |
title_fullStr | Ultrasound in augmented reality: a mixed-methods evaluation of head-mounted displays in image-guided interventions |
title_full_unstemmed | Ultrasound in augmented reality: a mixed-methods evaluation of head-mounted displays in image-guided interventions |
title_short | Ultrasound in augmented reality: a mixed-methods evaluation of head-mounted displays in image-guided interventions |
title_sort | ultrasound in augmented reality: a mixed-methods evaluation of head-mounted displays in image-guided interventions |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8332636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32725398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02236-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rugerchristoph ultrasoundinaugmentedrealityamixedmethodsevaluationofheadmounteddisplaysinimageguidedinterventions AT feufelmarkusa ultrasoundinaugmentedrealityamixedmethodsevaluationofheadmounteddisplaysinimageguidedinterventions AT moosburnersimon ultrasoundinaugmentedrealityamixedmethodsevaluationofheadmounteddisplaysinimageguidedinterventions AT ozbekchristopher ultrasoundinaugmentedrealityamixedmethodsevaluationofheadmounteddisplaysinimageguidedinterventions AT pratschkejohann ultrasoundinaugmentedrealityamixedmethodsevaluationofheadmounteddisplaysinimageguidedinterventions AT sauerigorm ultrasoundinaugmentedrealityamixedmethodsevaluationofheadmounteddisplaysinimageguidedinterventions |