Cargando…

Are All Wires Created the Same? A Quality Assurance Study of the Stiffness of Wires Typically Employed During Endovascular Surgery Using Tension Dynamometry

OBJECTIVE: There have only been a few studies on the stiffness and load bearing characteristics of guidewires used to deliver devices during endovascular procedures, particularly endovascular aneurysm repair. The aim of this study was to compare the load bearing characteristics of typical stiff and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaudhuri, Arindam, Heim, Frederic, Chakfe, Nabil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8332662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34382028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2021.06.006
_version_ 1783732933613322240
author Chaudhuri, Arindam
Heim, Frederic
Chakfe, Nabil
author_facet Chaudhuri, Arindam
Heim, Frederic
Chakfe, Nabil
author_sort Chaudhuri, Arindam
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: There have only been a few studies on the stiffness and load bearing characteristics of guidewires used to deliver devices during endovascular procedures, particularly endovascular aneurysm repair. The aim of this study was to compare the load bearing characteristics of typical stiff and floppy wires, including in the context of consistency for each wire type. METHODS: Two sets of stiff guidewires (Lunderquist Extra-Stiff and Amplatz Super Stiff [0.035” × 260 cm]), were compared with a floppy hydrophilic guidewire (Radifocus Stiff M [0.035” × 260 cm]). Radial stiffness was defined as the force (newtons [N]) needed to deform the wires on an electromechanical dynamometer. Tests were repeated with three runs on three sets of the same wire to check for consistency. Data were logged on proprietary dynamometric software and peak load values assessed per wire. Peak deformation forces (PDFs) from straight configuration to midwire deformation at 15 mm was translated into Microsoft Excel for statistical analysis in Minitab 19 for Windows. RESULTS: There was good agreement within each wire set, with no difference in PDFs from runs for each wire (p > .10). Mean ± standard deviation PDFs were 7.83 ± 0.23 N for the Lunderquist, 9.87 ± 0.92 N for the Amplatz, and 7.84 ± 0.52 N for the Radifocus wires. The Amplatz wire exhibited the greatest resistance to deformation vs. both the Lunderquist and Radifocus wires (p < .001, one way analysis of variance). Both Amplatz and Radifocus wires had non-linear deformation characteristics. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed that the represented hydrophilic wire is more deformable than the stiff wires. The Amplatz wire has complex construction features that yielded surprising baseline stiffness characteristics. The linear stiffness characteristics of the Lunderquist wire possibly contribute to it being the preferred choice for large endograft delivery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8332662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83326622021-08-10 Are All Wires Created the Same? A Quality Assurance Study of the Stiffness of Wires Typically Employed During Endovascular Surgery Using Tension Dynamometry Chaudhuri, Arindam Heim, Frederic Chakfe, Nabil EJVES Vasc Forum Original Research OBJECTIVE: There have only been a few studies on the stiffness and load bearing characteristics of guidewires used to deliver devices during endovascular procedures, particularly endovascular aneurysm repair. The aim of this study was to compare the load bearing characteristics of typical stiff and floppy wires, including in the context of consistency for each wire type. METHODS: Two sets of stiff guidewires (Lunderquist Extra-Stiff and Amplatz Super Stiff [0.035” × 260 cm]), were compared with a floppy hydrophilic guidewire (Radifocus Stiff M [0.035” × 260 cm]). Radial stiffness was defined as the force (newtons [N]) needed to deform the wires on an electromechanical dynamometer. Tests were repeated with three runs on three sets of the same wire to check for consistency. Data were logged on proprietary dynamometric software and peak load values assessed per wire. Peak deformation forces (PDFs) from straight configuration to midwire deformation at 15 mm was translated into Microsoft Excel for statistical analysis in Minitab 19 for Windows. RESULTS: There was good agreement within each wire set, with no difference in PDFs from runs for each wire (p > .10). Mean ± standard deviation PDFs were 7.83 ± 0.23 N for the Lunderquist, 9.87 ± 0.92 N for the Amplatz, and 7.84 ± 0.52 N for the Radifocus wires. The Amplatz wire exhibited the greatest resistance to deformation vs. both the Lunderquist and Radifocus wires (p < .001, one way analysis of variance). Both Amplatz and Radifocus wires had non-linear deformation characteristics. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed that the represented hydrophilic wire is more deformable than the stiff wires. The Amplatz wire has complex construction features that yielded surprising baseline stiffness characteristics. The linear stiffness characteristics of the Lunderquist wire possibly contribute to it being the preferred choice for large endograft delivery. Elsevier 2021-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8332662/ /pubmed/34382028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2021.06.006 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Chaudhuri, Arindam
Heim, Frederic
Chakfe, Nabil
Are All Wires Created the Same? A Quality Assurance Study of the Stiffness of Wires Typically Employed During Endovascular Surgery Using Tension Dynamometry
title Are All Wires Created the Same? A Quality Assurance Study of the Stiffness of Wires Typically Employed During Endovascular Surgery Using Tension Dynamometry
title_full Are All Wires Created the Same? A Quality Assurance Study of the Stiffness of Wires Typically Employed During Endovascular Surgery Using Tension Dynamometry
title_fullStr Are All Wires Created the Same? A Quality Assurance Study of the Stiffness of Wires Typically Employed During Endovascular Surgery Using Tension Dynamometry
title_full_unstemmed Are All Wires Created the Same? A Quality Assurance Study of the Stiffness of Wires Typically Employed During Endovascular Surgery Using Tension Dynamometry
title_short Are All Wires Created the Same? A Quality Assurance Study of the Stiffness of Wires Typically Employed During Endovascular Surgery Using Tension Dynamometry
title_sort are all wires created the same? a quality assurance study of the stiffness of wires typically employed during endovascular surgery using tension dynamometry
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8332662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34382028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2021.06.006
work_keys_str_mv AT chaudhuriarindam areallwirescreatedthesameaqualityassurancestudyofthestiffnessofwirestypicallyemployedduringendovascularsurgeryusingtensiondynamometry
AT heimfrederic areallwirescreatedthesameaqualityassurancestudyofthestiffnessofwirestypicallyemployedduringendovascularsurgeryusingtensiondynamometry
AT chakfenabil areallwirescreatedthesameaqualityassurancestudyofthestiffnessofwirestypicallyemployedduringendovascularsurgeryusingtensiondynamometry