Cargando…
Introducing Rotavirus Vaccination in Nigeria: Economic Evaluation and Implications
BACKGROUND: As Nigeria prepares to introduce a rotavirus vaccine, the Gavi board has approved the extension of the transition period for the country until 2028. The current position of the country on Gavi’s funding profile calls for a pragmatic step in planning and implementation so that sustainabil...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8333113/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33410094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00251-6 |
_version_ | 1783732970753884160 |
---|---|
author | Okafor, Charles Ebuka |
author_facet | Okafor, Charles Ebuka |
author_sort | Okafor, Charles Ebuka |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As Nigeria prepares to introduce a rotavirus vaccine, the Gavi board has approved the extension of the transition period for the country until 2028. The current position of the country on Gavi’s funding profile calls for a pragmatic step in planning and implementation so that sustainability at the fully self-financing phase will be feasible. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to inform the decisions of the country’s health policymakers on the costs, benefits, and implications of the introduction of rotavirus vaccine. METHODS: This study was an economic evaluation using a simulation-based Markov model. It compared four approaches: ‘no vaccination’ and vaccination with ROTARIX, ROTAVAC, or ROTASIIL. Ten cohorts from the year 2021 to 2030 were used in the analysis. Primary measures were the benefit-cost ratio (BCR) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Future costs and outcomes were discounted to 2019 values. RESULTS: The adjusted vaccine cost of ROTARIX was the highest, followed by ROTAVAC and ROTASIIL, whereas the immunization delivery cost was in the reverse order. All the vaccines were very cost effective, with ROTARIX being the optimal choice for the 10-year period, having a BCR of 27 and an ICER of $US100 (95% confidence interval [CI] 71–130)/disability-adjusted life-year averted. Adopting ROTARIX was the optimal choice from 2021 to 2027, whereas ROTAVAC was optimal from 2028 to 2030. The net budget impact of the programme was $US76.9 million for the 10-year period. The opportunity cost of a late introduction was about $US8 million per annum from 2021 to 2028. CONCLUSIONS: The rotavirus vaccine ROTARIX should be implemented in Nigeria at the earliest opportunity. A switch to ROTAVAC should be considered from the year 2028. Cost-minimization measures are imperative to ensure the sustainability of the programme after the transition out of Gavi support. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41669-020-00251-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8333113 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83331132021-08-20 Introducing Rotavirus Vaccination in Nigeria: Economic Evaluation and Implications Okafor, Charles Ebuka Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article BACKGROUND: As Nigeria prepares to introduce a rotavirus vaccine, the Gavi board has approved the extension of the transition period for the country until 2028. The current position of the country on Gavi’s funding profile calls for a pragmatic step in planning and implementation so that sustainability at the fully self-financing phase will be feasible. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to inform the decisions of the country’s health policymakers on the costs, benefits, and implications of the introduction of rotavirus vaccine. METHODS: This study was an economic evaluation using a simulation-based Markov model. It compared four approaches: ‘no vaccination’ and vaccination with ROTARIX, ROTAVAC, or ROTASIIL. Ten cohorts from the year 2021 to 2030 were used in the analysis. Primary measures were the benefit-cost ratio (BCR) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Future costs and outcomes were discounted to 2019 values. RESULTS: The adjusted vaccine cost of ROTARIX was the highest, followed by ROTAVAC and ROTASIIL, whereas the immunization delivery cost was in the reverse order. All the vaccines were very cost effective, with ROTARIX being the optimal choice for the 10-year period, having a BCR of 27 and an ICER of $US100 (95% confidence interval [CI] 71–130)/disability-adjusted life-year averted. Adopting ROTARIX was the optimal choice from 2021 to 2027, whereas ROTAVAC was optimal from 2028 to 2030. The net budget impact of the programme was $US76.9 million for the 10-year period. The opportunity cost of a late introduction was about $US8 million per annum from 2021 to 2028. CONCLUSIONS: The rotavirus vaccine ROTARIX should be implemented in Nigeria at the earliest opportunity. A switch to ROTAVAC should be considered from the year 2028. Cost-minimization measures are imperative to ensure the sustainability of the programme after the transition out of Gavi support. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41669-020-00251-6. Springer International Publishing 2021-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8333113/ /pubmed/33410094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00251-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Okafor, Charles Ebuka Introducing Rotavirus Vaccination in Nigeria: Economic Evaluation and Implications |
title | Introducing Rotavirus Vaccination in Nigeria: Economic Evaluation and Implications |
title_full | Introducing Rotavirus Vaccination in Nigeria: Economic Evaluation and Implications |
title_fullStr | Introducing Rotavirus Vaccination in Nigeria: Economic Evaluation and Implications |
title_full_unstemmed | Introducing Rotavirus Vaccination in Nigeria: Economic Evaluation and Implications |
title_short | Introducing Rotavirus Vaccination in Nigeria: Economic Evaluation and Implications |
title_sort | introducing rotavirus vaccination in nigeria: economic evaluation and implications |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8333113/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33410094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00251-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT okaforcharlesebuka introducingrotavirusvaccinationinnigeriaeconomicevaluationandimplications |