Cargando…
Psychometric Validation of the Growth Hormone Deficiency-Child Impact Measure (GHD-CIM)
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to perform psychometric testing of the Growth Hormone Deficiency-Child Impact Measure (GHD-CIM): a patient-reported outcome (PRO) for children with GHD aged 9 to < 13 years and an observer-reported outcome (ObsRO) for parents/guardians of children who are unab...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8333138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33433896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00252-5 |
_version_ | 1783732971432312832 |
---|---|
author | Brod, Meryl Højby Rasmussen, Michael Vad, Knud Alolga, Suzanne Bushnell, Donald M. Bedoin, Jacques Maniatis, Aristides |
author_facet | Brod, Meryl Højby Rasmussen, Michael Vad, Knud Alolga, Suzanne Bushnell, Donald M. Bedoin, Jacques Maniatis, Aristides |
author_sort | Brod, Meryl |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to perform psychometric testing of the Growth Hormone Deficiency-Child Impact Measure (GHD-CIM): a patient-reported outcome (PRO) for children with GHD aged 9 to < 13 years and an observer-reported outcome (ObsRO) for parents/guardians of children who are unable to answer for themselves. METHODS: A non-interventional, multicenter, clinic-based study was conducted in 30 private-practice and large institutional sites in the US and the UK. Psychometric analyses were conducted following an a priori validation statistical analysis plan. RESULTS: A preliminary examination of the data determined a PRO version for children aged 9 to < 13 years was not psychometrically sound and therefore the decision was made to have only an ObsRO measure of the GHD-CIM, which would be suitable for children aged 4 to < 13 years. The GHD-CIM ObsRO validity analyses included 98 parents/guardians. Factor analyses identified three domains: Physical Functioning (PHYS), Social Well-Being (SWB), and Emotional Well-Being (EWB). Internal consistency reliability was acceptable for all domains and for the overall score (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.70), as was test–retest reliability for the SWB, EWB and overall (above 0.70). At least one convergent validity hypotheses for each domain and overall was proven (r > 0.40). Known-groups validity hypotheses for the EWB and SWB domains were significant (p < 0.05). Associated effect sizes ranged from − 0.40 to − 0.58, indicating that the GHD-CIM is sensitive to change. Anchor-based patient and clinician ratings of severity of disease suggest a preliminary minimally important difference of 5 points for the overall score, and 5 for PHYS, 7 for EWB, and 5 for SWB. CONCLUSIONS: The GHD-CIM ObsRO was found to be a reliable and valid measure to assess disease-specific functioning, which will provide a more complete patient-centric picture to the growth hormone therapy experience in children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02580032, first posted 20 October 2015. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8333138 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83331382021-08-20 Psychometric Validation of the Growth Hormone Deficiency-Child Impact Measure (GHD-CIM) Brod, Meryl Højby Rasmussen, Michael Vad, Knud Alolga, Suzanne Bushnell, Donald M. Bedoin, Jacques Maniatis, Aristides Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to perform psychometric testing of the Growth Hormone Deficiency-Child Impact Measure (GHD-CIM): a patient-reported outcome (PRO) for children with GHD aged 9 to < 13 years and an observer-reported outcome (ObsRO) for parents/guardians of children who are unable to answer for themselves. METHODS: A non-interventional, multicenter, clinic-based study was conducted in 30 private-practice and large institutional sites in the US and the UK. Psychometric analyses were conducted following an a priori validation statistical analysis plan. RESULTS: A preliminary examination of the data determined a PRO version for children aged 9 to < 13 years was not psychometrically sound and therefore the decision was made to have only an ObsRO measure of the GHD-CIM, which would be suitable for children aged 4 to < 13 years. The GHD-CIM ObsRO validity analyses included 98 parents/guardians. Factor analyses identified three domains: Physical Functioning (PHYS), Social Well-Being (SWB), and Emotional Well-Being (EWB). Internal consistency reliability was acceptable for all domains and for the overall score (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.70), as was test–retest reliability for the SWB, EWB and overall (above 0.70). At least one convergent validity hypotheses for each domain and overall was proven (r > 0.40). Known-groups validity hypotheses for the EWB and SWB domains were significant (p < 0.05). Associated effect sizes ranged from − 0.40 to − 0.58, indicating that the GHD-CIM is sensitive to change. Anchor-based patient and clinician ratings of severity of disease suggest a preliminary minimally important difference of 5 points for the overall score, and 5 for PHYS, 7 for EWB, and 5 for SWB. CONCLUSIONS: The GHD-CIM ObsRO was found to be a reliable and valid measure to assess disease-specific functioning, which will provide a more complete patient-centric picture to the growth hormone therapy experience in children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02580032, first posted 20 October 2015. Springer International Publishing 2021-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8333138/ /pubmed/33433896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00252-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Brod, Meryl Højby Rasmussen, Michael Vad, Knud Alolga, Suzanne Bushnell, Donald M. Bedoin, Jacques Maniatis, Aristides Psychometric Validation of the Growth Hormone Deficiency-Child Impact Measure (GHD-CIM) |
title | Psychometric Validation of the Growth Hormone Deficiency-Child Impact Measure (GHD-CIM) |
title_full | Psychometric Validation of the Growth Hormone Deficiency-Child Impact Measure (GHD-CIM) |
title_fullStr | Psychometric Validation of the Growth Hormone Deficiency-Child Impact Measure (GHD-CIM) |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychometric Validation of the Growth Hormone Deficiency-Child Impact Measure (GHD-CIM) |
title_short | Psychometric Validation of the Growth Hormone Deficiency-Child Impact Measure (GHD-CIM) |
title_sort | psychometric validation of the growth hormone deficiency-child impact measure (ghd-cim) |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8333138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33433896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00252-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brodmeryl psychometricvalidationofthegrowthhormonedeficiencychildimpactmeasureghdcim AT højbyrasmussenmichael psychometricvalidationofthegrowthhormonedeficiencychildimpactmeasureghdcim AT vadknud psychometricvalidationofthegrowthhormonedeficiencychildimpactmeasureghdcim AT alolgasuzanne psychometricvalidationofthegrowthhormonedeficiencychildimpactmeasureghdcim AT bushnelldonaldm psychometricvalidationofthegrowthhormonedeficiencychildimpactmeasureghdcim AT bedoinjacques psychometricvalidationofthegrowthhormonedeficiencychildimpactmeasureghdcim AT maniatisaristides psychometricvalidationofthegrowthhormonedeficiencychildimpactmeasureghdcim |