Cargando…
Very high-power short-duration temperature-controlled ablation versus conventional power-controlled ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: The fast and furious - AF study
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment provides effective and durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and is associated with encouraging clinical outcome. A novel CF sensing temperature-controlled radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheter allows for very high-power short-dur...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8333145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34381869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100847 |
_version_ | 1783732972857327616 |
---|---|
author | Richard Tilz, Roland Sano, Makoto Vogler, Julia Fink, Thomas Saraei, Roza Sciacca, Vanessa Kirstein, Bettina Phan, Huong-Lan Hatahet, Sascha Delgado Lopez, Lisbeth Traub, Anna Eitel, Charlotte Schlüter, Michael Kuck, Karl-Heinz Heeger, Christian-Hendrik |
author_facet | Richard Tilz, Roland Sano, Makoto Vogler, Julia Fink, Thomas Saraei, Roza Sciacca, Vanessa Kirstein, Bettina Phan, Huong-Lan Hatahet, Sascha Delgado Lopez, Lisbeth Traub, Anna Eitel, Charlotte Schlüter, Michael Kuck, Karl-Heinz Heeger, Christian-Hendrik |
author_sort | Richard Tilz, Roland |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment provides effective and durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and is associated with encouraging clinical outcome. A novel CF sensing temperature-controlled radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheter allows for very high-power short-duration (vHP-SD, 90 W/4 s) ablation aiming a potentially safer, more effective and faster ablation. We thought to evaluate preliminary safety and efficacy of vHP-SD ablation for PVI utilizing a novel vHP-SD catheter. The data was compared to conventional power-controlled ablation index (AI) guided PVI utilizing conventional contact force (CF) sensing catheters. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-six patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF were prospectively enrolled in this study. Twenty-eight consecutive patients underwent vHP-SD based PVI (vHP-SD group) and were compared to 28 consecutive patients treated with conventional CF-sensing catheters utilizing the AI (control group). All PVs were successfully isolated using vHP-SD. The median RF ablation time for vHP-SD was 338 (IQR 286, 367) seconds vs control 1580 (IQR 1350, 1848) seconds (p < 0.0001), the median procedure duration was vHP-SD 55 (IQR 48–60) minutes vs. control 105 (IQR 92–120) minutes (p < 0.0001). No differences in periprocedural complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary data of the novel vHP-SD ablation mode provides safe and effective PVI. Procedure duration and RF ablation time were substantially shorter in the vHP-SD group in comparison to the control group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8333145 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83331452021-08-10 Very high-power short-duration temperature-controlled ablation versus conventional power-controlled ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: The fast and furious - AF study Richard Tilz, Roland Sano, Makoto Vogler, Julia Fink, Thomas Saraei, Roza Sciacca, Vanessa Kirstein, Bettina Phan, Huong-Lan Hatahet, Sascha Delgado Lopez, Lisbeth Traub, Anna Eitel, Charlotte Schlüter, Michael Kuck, Karl-Heinz Heeger, Christian-Hendrik Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Original Paper BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment provides effective and durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and is associated with encouraging clinical outcome. A novel CF sensing temperature-controlled radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheter allows for very high-power short-duration (vHP-SD, 90 W/4 s) ablation aiming a potentially safer, more effective and faster ablation. We thought to evaluate preliminary safety and efficacy of vHP-SD ablation for PVI utilizing a novel vHP-SD catheter. The data was compared to conventional power-controlled ablation index (AI) guided PVI utilizing conventional contact force (CF) sensing catheters. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-six patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF were prospectively enrolled in this study. Twenty-eight consecutive patients underwent vHP-SD based PVI (vHP-SD group) and were compared to 28 consecutive patients treated with conventional CF-sensing catheters utilizing the AI (control group). All PVs were successfully isolated using vHP-SD. The median RF ablation time for vHP-SD was 338 (IQR 286, 367) seconds vs control 1580 (IQR 1350, 1848) seconds (p < 0.0001), the median procedure duration was vHP-SD 55 (IQR 48–60) minutes vs. control 105 (IQR 92–120) minutes (p < 0.0001). No differences in periprocedural complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary data of the novel vHP-SD ablation mode provides safe and effective PVI. Procedure duration and RF ablation time were substantially shorter in the vHP-SD group in comparison to the control group. Elsevier 2021-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8333145/ /pubmed/34381869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100847 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Richard Tilz, Roland Sano, Makoto Vogler, Julia Fink, Thomas Saraei, Roza Sciacca, Vanessa Kirstein, Bettina Phan, Huong-Lan Hatahet, Sascha Delgado Lopez, Lisbeth Traub, Anna Eitel, Charlotte Schlüter, Michael Kuck, Karl-Heinz Heeger, Christian-Hendrik Very high-power short-duration temperature-controlled ablation versus conventional power-controlled ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: The fast and furious - AF study |
title | Very high-power short-duration temperature-controlled ablation versus conventional power-controlled ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: The fast and furious - AF study |
title_full | Very high-power short-duration temperature-controlled ablation versus conventional power-controlled ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: The fast and furious - AF study |
title_fullStr | Very high-power short-duration temperature-controlled ablation versus conventional power-controlled ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: The fast and furious - AF study |
title_full_unstemmed | Very high-power short-duration temperature-controlled ablation versus conventional power-controlled ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: The fast and furious - AF study |
title_short | Very high-power short-duration temperature-controlled ablation versus conventional power-controlled ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: The fast and furious - AF study |
title_sort | very high-power short-duration temperature-controlled ablation versus conventional power-controlled ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: the fast and furious - af study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8333145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34381869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100847 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT richardtilzroland veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy AT sanomakoto veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy AT voglerjulia veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy AT finkthomas veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy AT saraeiroza veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy AT sciaccavanessa veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy AT kirsteinbettina veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy AT phanhuonglan veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy AT hatahetsascha veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy AT delgadolopezlisbeth veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy AT traubanna veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy AT eitelcharlotte veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy AT schlutermichael veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy AT kuckkarlheinz veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy AT heegerchristianhendrik veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy |