Cargando…

Very high-power short-duration temperature-controlled ablation versus conventional power-controlled ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: The fast and furious - AF study

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment provides effective and durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and is associated with encouraging clinical outcome. A novel CF sensing temperature-controlled radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheter allows for very high-power short-dur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richard Tilz, Roland, Sano, Makoto, Vogler, Julia, Fink, Thomas, Saraei, Roza, Sciacca, Vanessa, Kirstein, Bettina, Phan, Huong-Lan, Hatahet, Sascha, Delgado Lopez, Lisbeth, Traub, Anna, Eitel, Charlotte, Schlüter, Michael, Kuck, Karl-Heinz, Heeger, Christian-Hendrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8333145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34381869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100847
_version_ 1783732972857327616
author Richard Tilz, Roland
Sano, Makoto
Vogler, Julia
Fink, Thomas
Saraei, Roza
Sciacca, Vanessa
Kirstein, Bettina
Phan, Huong-Lan
Hatahet, Sascha
Delgado Lopez, Lisbeth
Traub, Anna
Eitel, Charlotte
Schlüter, Michael
Kuck, Karl-Heinz
Heeger, Christian-Hendrik
author_facet Richard Tilz, Roland
Sano, Makoto
Vogler, Julia
Fink, Thomas
Saraei, Roza
Sciacca, Vanessa
Kirstein, Bettina
Phan, Huong-Lan
Hatahet, Sascha
Delgado Lopez, Lisbeth
Traub, Anna
Eitel, Charlotte
Schlüter, Michael
Kuck, Karl-Heinz
Heeger, Christian-Hendrik
author_sort Richard Tilz, Roland
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment provides effective and durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and is associated with encouraging clinical outcome. A novel CF sensing temperature-controlled radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheter allows for very high-power short-duration (vHP-SD, 90 W/4 s) ablation aiming a potentially safer, more effective and faster ablation. We thought to evaluate preliminary safety and efficacy of vHP-SD ablation for PVI utilizing a novel vHP-SD catheter. The data was compared to conventional power-controlled ablation index (AI) guided PVI utilizing conventional contact force (CF) sensing catheters. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-six patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF were prospectively enrolled in this study. Twenty-eight consecutive patients underwent vHP-SD based PVI (vHP-SD group) and were compared to 28 consecutive patients treated with conventional CF-sensing catheters utilizing the AI (control group). All PVs were successfully isolated using vHP-SD. The median RF ablation time for vHP-SD was 338 (IQR 286, 367) seconds vs control 1580 (IQR 1350, 1848) seconds (p < 0.0001), the median procedure duration was vHP-SD 55 (IQR 48–60) minutes vs. control 105 (IQR 92–120) minutes (p < 0.0001). No differences in periprocedural complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary data of the novel vHP-SD ablation mode provides safe and effective PVI. Procedure duration and RF ablation time were substantially shorter in the vHP-SD group in comparison to the control group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8333145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83331452021-08-10 Very high-power short-duration temperature-controlled ablation versus conventional power-controlled ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: The fast and furious - AF study Richard Tilz, Roland Sano, Makoto Vogler, Julia Fink, Thomas Saraei, Roza Sciacca, Vanessa Kirstein, Bettina Phan, Huong-Lan Hatahet, Sascha Delgado Lopez, Lisbeth Traub, Anna Eitel, Charlotte Schlüter, Michael Kuck, Karl-Heinz Heeger, Christian-Hendrik Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Original Paper BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment provides effective and durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and is associated with encouraging clinical outcome. A novel CF sensing temperature-controlled radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheter allows for very high-power short-duration (vHP-SD, 90 W/4 s) ablation aiming a potentially safer, more effective and faster ablation. We thought to evaluate preliminary safety and efficacy of vHP-SD ablation for PVI utilizing a novel vHP-SD catheter. The data was compared to conventional power-controlled ablation index (AI) guided PVI utilizing conventional contact force (CF) sensing catheters. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-six patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF were prospectively enrolled in this study. Twenty-eight consecutive patients underwent vHP-SD based PVI (vHP-SD group) and were compared to 28 consecutive patients treated with conventional CF-sensing catheters utilizing the AI (control group). All PVs were successfully isolated using vHP-SD. The median RF ablation time for vHP-SD was 338 (IQR 286, 367) seconds vs control 1580 (IQR 1350, 1848) seconds (p < 0.0001), the median procedure duration was vHP-SD 55 (IQR 48–60) minutes vs. control 105 (IQR 92–120) minutes (p < 0.0001). No differences in periprocedural complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary data of the novel vHP-SD ablation mode provides safe and effective PVI. Procedure duration and RF ablation time were substantially shorter in the vHP-SD group in comparison to the control group. Elsevier 2021-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8333145/ /pubmed/34381869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100847 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Paper
Richard Tilz, Roland
Sano, Makoto
Vogler, Julia
Fink, Thomas
Saraei, Roza
Sciacca, Vanessa
Kirstein, Bettina
Phan, Huong-Lan
Hatahet, Sascha
Delgado Lopez, Lisbeth
Traub, Anna
Eitel, Charlotte
Schlüter, Michael
Kuck, Karl-Heinz
Heeger, Christian-Hendrik
Very high-power short-duration temperature-controlled ablation versus conventional power-controlled ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: The fast and furious - AF study
title Very high-power short-duration temperature-controlled ablation versus conventional power-controlled ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: The fast and furious - AF study
title_full Very high-power short-duration temperature-controlled ablation versus conventional power-controlled ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: The fast and furious - AF study
title_fullStr Very high-power short-duration temperature-controlled ablation versus conventional power-controlled ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: The fast and furious - AF study
title_full_unstemmed Very high-power short-duration temperature-controlled ablation versus conventional power-controlled ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: The fast and furious - AF study
title_short Very high-power short-duration temperature-controlled ablation versus conventional power-controlled ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: The fast and furious - AF study
title_sort very high-power short-duration temperature-controlled ablation versus conventional power-controlled ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: the fast and furious - af study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8333145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34381869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100847
work_keys_str_mv AT richardtilzroland veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy
AT sanomakoto veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy
AT voglerjulia veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy
AT finkthomas veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy
AT saraeiroza veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy
AT sciaccavanessa veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy
AT kirsteinbettina veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy
AT phanhuonglan veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy
AT hatahetsascha veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy
AT delgadolopezlisbeth veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy
AT traubanna veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy
AT eitelcharlotte veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy
AT schlutermichael veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy
AT kuckkarlheinz veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy
AT heegerchristianhendrik veryhighpowershortdurationtemperaturecontrolledablationversusconventionalpowercontrolledablationforpulmonaryveinisolationthefastandfuriousafstudy