Cargando…
Economic Analysis of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Utilizing a Curved Bone Removal Device
BACKGROUND: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) represents a commonly performed spinal procedure that poses a significant financial burden on patients, hospitals and insurers. Reducing these costs, while maintaining efficacy, may be assisted by a new powered endplate preparation device, de...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8333172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33462767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00256-1 |
_version_ | 1783732979727597568 |
---|---|
author | Peloza, John H. Millgram, Michael A. Jacobian, Erel Kolsky, Daniel E. Guyer, Richard D. Le Huec, Jean-Charles Ashkenazi, Ely |
author_facet | Peloza, John H. Millgram, Michael A. Jacobian, Erel Kolsky, Daniel E. Guyer, Richard D. Le Huec, Jean-Charles Ashkenazi, Ely |
author_sort | Peloza, John H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) represents a commonly performed spinal procedure that poses a significant financial burden on patients, hospitals and insurers. Reducing these costs, while maintaining efficacy, may be assisted by a new powered endplate preparation device, designed to shorten procedural time while offering positive impacts on other elements that contribute to the cost of care. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess and compare the individual cost elements of TLIF procedures with and without the use of the device, to determine whether application of this technology translated into any material procedural savings. METHODS: The records of 208 single-level TLIF procedures in a single hospital were reviewed. Surgical time, length of hospital stay, blood loss, infection rate, and other parameters were compared for the cases where the device was used (device group; n = 143) and cases which used standard tools (control group; n = 65). The cost per unit of each element was derived from the literature, online resources, and the hospital’s financial department. RESULTS: The analysis revealed a shorter surgery duration in the device group (23 min, after controlling for procedure year and patient characteristics; statistically significant at p < 0.001) and lower complication and readmission rates (p = 0.67 and p = 0.21, respectively) associated with the use of the device, leading to a statistically significant cost reduction of approximately 2060 US dollars (US$) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The study suggests that use of the device may lead to a cost reduction and shorter procedure without deteriorating the clinical outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8333172 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83331722021-08-20 Economic Analysis of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Utilizing a Curved Bone Removal Device Peloza, John H. Millgram, Michael A. Jacobian, Erel Kolsky, Daniel E. Guyer, Richard D. Le Huec, Jean-Charles Ashkenazi, Ely Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) represents a commonly performed spinal procedure that poses a significant financial burden on patients, hospitals and insurers. Reducing these costs, while maintaining efficacy, may be assisted by a new powered endplate preparation device, designed to shorten procedural time while offering positive impacts on other elements that contribute to the cost of care. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess and compare the individual cost elements of TLIF procedures with and without the use of the device, to determine whether application of this technology translated into any material procedural savings. METHODS: The records of 208 single-level TLIF procedures in a single hospital were reviewed. Surgical time, length of hospital stay, blood loss, infection rate, and other parameters were compared for the cases where the device was used (device group; n = 143) and cases which used standard tools (control group; n = 65). The cost per unit of each element was derived from the literature, online resources, and the hospital’s financial department. RESULTS: The analysis revealed a shorter surgery duration in the device group (23 min, after controlling for procedure year and patient characteristics; statistically significant at p < 0.001) and lower complication and readmission rates (p = 0.67 and p = 0.21, respectively) associated with the use of the device, leading to a statistically significant cost reduction of approximately 2060 US dollars (US$) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The study suggests that use of the device may lead to a cost reduction and shorter procedure without deteriorating the clinical outcome. Springer International Publishing 2021-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8333172/ /pubmed/33462767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00256-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Peloza, John H. Millgram, Michael A. Jacobian, Erel Kolsky, Daniel E. Guyer, Richard D. Le Huec, Jean-Charles Ashkenazi, Ely Economic Analysis of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Utilizing a Curved Bone Removal Device |
title | Economic Analysis of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Utilizing a Curved Bone Removal Device |
title_full | Economic Analysis of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Utilizing a Curved Bone Removal Device |
title_fullStr | Economic Analysis of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Utilizing a Curved Bone Removal Device |
title_full_unstemmed | Economic Analysis of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Utilizing a Curved Bone Removal Device |
title_short | Economic Analysis of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Utilizing a Curved Bone Removal Device |
title_sort | economic analysis of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery utilizing a curved bone removal device |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8333172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33462767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00256-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pelozajohnh economicanalysisoftransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionsurgeryutilizingacurvedboneremovaldevice AT millgrammichaela economicanalysisoftransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionsurgeryutilizingacurvedboneremovaldevice AT jacobianerel economicanalysisoftransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionsurgeryutilizingacurvedboneremovaldevice AT kolskydaniele economicanalysisoftransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionsurgeryutilizingacurvedboneremovaldevice AT guyerrichardd economicanalysisoftransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionsurgeryutilizingacurvedboneremovaldevice AT lehuecjeancharles economicanalysisoftransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionsurgeryutilizingacurvedboneremovaldevice AT ashkenaziely economicanalysisoftransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionsurgeryutilizingacurvedboneremovaldevice |