Cargando…
Initial Validation of the Mindful Presence Scale: The Issue of the Construal Level of Scale Items
Our research has two main aims. It undertakes the validation of a six-item trait mindfulness scale called Mindful Presence Scale (MPS), which measures central aspects of mindfulness. For the first time in mindfulness literature, the construal level of scale items is also examined. Four questionnaire...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8333280/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34366955 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626084 |
_version_ | 1783732992642908160 |
---|---|
author | Lengyel, Attila Keczeli, Danica Orosz, Róbert Bács, Zoltán Müller, Anetta Szőke, Szilvia Bába, Éva Bácsné |
author_facet | Lengyel, Attila Keczeli, Danica Orosz, Róbert Bács, Zoltán Müller, Anetta Szőke, Szilvia Bába, Éva Bácsné |
author_sort | Lengyel, Attila |
collection | PubMed |
description | Our research has two main aims. It undertakes the validation of a six-item trait mindfulness scale called Mindful Presence Scale (MPS), which measures central aspects of mindfulness. For the first time in mindfulness literature, the construal level of scale items is also examined. Four questionnaire-based online studies were conducted. Study 1 drew three samples (n(n) = 391, n(p) = 215, and n(b) = 235) from the students at the University of Debrecen. It examined the factor structure, reliability, and internal consistency of the three differently worded scale versions. The positively worded scale version (MPSp) yielded a stable two-factor structure and demonstrated the best psychometric properties. Study 2 performed a confirmatory factor analysis on a sample drawn from public employees across the country (n(cfa) = 420). The two-factor solution in Study 1 was confirmed. χ(2) tests were not significant, and fit indices were excellent. There was no significant difference between the high-level construal subscale (F(hlc)) and the low-level construal subscale (F(llc)) in terms of factorial stability. Participant of Study 3 were students who did not take part in Study 1. The sample (n(inv) = 250) was tested for measurement invariance across gender. The scaled results supported strong/threshold invariance. Study 4 tested concurrent validity with 10 concurrent instruments. A sample of secondary school teachers (n(con) = 128) was tested by examining Spearman's rank order correlations. There was a significant difference in how the F(hlc) and F(llc) subscales predicted scores of some of the concurrent instruments. Further research is warranted into how the construal level of mindfulness scale items affects the recollection of the mindful experience. Overall, MPS(p) proved to be a valid short mindfulness measure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8333280 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83332802021-08-05 Initial Validation of the Mindful Presence Scale: The Issue of the Construal Level of Scale Items Lengyel, Attila Keczeli, Danica Orosz, Róbert Bács, Zoltán Müller, Anetta Szőke, Szilvia Bába, Éva Bácsné Front Psychol Psychology Our research has two main aims. It undertakes the validation of a six-item trait mindfulness scale called Mindful Presence Scale (MPS), which measures central aspects of mindfulness. For the first time in mindfulness literature, the construal level of scale items is also examined. Four questionnaire-based online studies were conducted. Study 1 drew three samples (n(n) = 391, n(p) = 215, and n(b) = 235) from the students at the University of Debrecen. It examined the factor structure, reliability, and internal consistency of the three differently worded scale versions. The positively worded scale version (MPSp) yielded a stable two-factor structure and demonstrated the best psychometric properties. Study 2 performed a confirmatory factor analysis on a sample drawn from public employees across the country (n(cfa) = 420). The two-factor solution in Study 1 was confirmed. χ(2) tests were not significant, and fit indices were excellent. There was no significant difference between the high-level construal subscale (F(hlc)) and the low-level construal subscale (F(llc)) in terms of factorial stability. Participant of Study 3 were students who did not take part in Study 1. The sample (n(inv) = 250) was tested for measurement invariance across gender. The scaled results supported strong/threshold invariance. Study 4 tested concurrent validity with 10 concurrent instruments. A sample of secondary school teachers (n(con) = 128) was tested by examining Spearman's rank order correlations. There was a significant difference in how the F(hlc) and F(llc) subscales predicted scores of some of the concurrent instruments. Further research is warranted into how the construal level of mindfulness scale items affects the recollection of the mindful experience. Overall, MPS(p) proved to be a valid short mindfulness measure. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8333280/ /pubmed/34366955 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626084 Text en Copyright © 2021 Lengyel, Keczeli, Orosz, Bács, Müller, Szőke and Bácsné Bába. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Lengyel, Attila Keczeli, Danica Orosz, Róbert Bács, Zoltán Müller, Anetta Szőke, Szilvia Bába, Éva Bácsné Initial Validation of the Mindful Presence Scale: The Issue of the Construal Level of Scale Items |
title | Initial Validation of the Mindful Presence Scale: The Issue of the Construal Level of Scale Items |
title_full | Initial Validation of the Mindful Presence Scale: The Issue of the Construal Level of Scale Items |
title_fullStr | Initial Validation of the Mindful Presence Scale: The Issue of the Construal Level of Scale Items |
title_full_unstemmed | Initial Validation of the Mindful Presence Scale: The Issue of the Construal Level of Scale Items |
title_short | Initial Validation of the Mindful Presence Scale: The Issue of the Construal Level of Scale Items |
title_sort | initial validation of the mindful presence scale: the issue of the construal level of scale items |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8333280/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34366955 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626084 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lengyelattila initialvalidationofthemindfulpresencescaletheissueoftheconstruallevelofscaleitems AT keczelidanica initialvalidationofthemindfulpresencescaletheissueoftheconstruallevelofscaleitems AT oroszrobert initialvalidationofthemindfulpresencescaletheissueoftheconstruallevelofscaleitems AT bacszoltan initialvalidationofthemindfulpresencescaletheissueoftheconstruallevelofscaleitems AT mulleranetta initialvalidationofthemindfulpresencescaletheissueoftheconstruallevelofscaleitems AT szokeszilvia initialvalidationofthemindfulpresencescaletheissueoftheconstruallevelofscaleitems AT babaevabacsne initialvalidationofthemindfulpresencescaletheissueoftheconstruallevelofscaleitems |