Cargando…

Initial Validation of the Mindful Presence Scale: The Issue of the Construal Level of Scale Items

Our research has two main aims. It undertakes the validation of a six-item trait mindfulness scale called Mindful Presence Scale (MPS), which measures central aspects of mindfulness. For the first time in mindfulness literature, the construal level of scale items is also examined. Four questionnaire...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lengyel, Attila, Keczeli, Danica, Orosz, Róbert, Bács, Zoltán, Müller, Anetta, Szőke, Szilvia, Bába, Éva Bácsné
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8333280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34366955
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626084
_version_ 1783732992642908160
author Lengyel, Attila
Keczeli, Danica
Orosz, Róbert
Bács, Zoltán
Müller, Anetta
Szőke, Szilvia
Bába, Éva Bácsné
author_facet Lengyel, Attila
Keczeli, Danica
Orosz, Róbert
Bács, Zoltán
Müller, Anetta
Szőke, Szilvia
Bába, Éva Bácsné
author_sort Lengyel, Attila
collection PubMed
description Our research has two main aims. It undertakes the validation of a six-item trait mindfulness scale called Mindful Presence Scale (MPS), which measures central aspects of mindfulness. For the first time in mindfulness literature, the construal level of scale items is also examined. Four questionnaire-based online studies were conducted. Study 1 drew three samples (n(n) = 391, n(p) = 215, and n(b) = 235) from the students at the University of Debrecen. It examined the factor structure, reliability, and internal consistency of the three differently worded scale versions. The positively worded scale version (MPSp) yielded a stable two-factor structure and demonstrated the best psychometric properties. Study 2 performed a confirmatory factor analysis on a sample drawn from public employees across the country (n(cfa) = 420). The two-factor solution in Study 1 was confirmed. χ(2) tests were not significant, and fit indices were excellent. There was no significant difference between the high-level construal subscale (F(hlc)) and the low-level construal subscale (F(llc)) in terms of factorial stability. Participant of Study 3 were students who did not take part in Study 1. The sample (n(inv) = 250) was tested for measurement invariance across gender. The scaled results supported strong/threshold invariance. Study 4 tested concurrent validity with 10 concurrent instruments. A sample of secondary school teachers (n(con) = 128) was tested by examining Spearman's rank order correlations. There was a significant difference in how the F(hlc) and F(llc) subscales predicted scores of some of the concurrent instruments. Further research is warranted into how the construal level of mindfulness scale items affects the recollection of the mindful experience. Overall, MPS(p) proved to be a valid short mindfulness measure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8333280
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83332802021-08-05 Initial Validation of the Mindful Presence Scale: The Issue of the Construal Level of Scale Items Lengyel, Attila Keczeli, Danica Orosz, Róbert Bács, Zoltán Müller, Anetta Szőke, Szilvia Bába, Éva Bácsné Front Psychol Psychology Our research has two main aims. It undertakes the validation of a six-item trait mindfulness scale called Mindful Presence Scale (MPS), which measures central aspects of mindfulness. For the first time in mindfulness literature, the construal level of scale items is also examined. Four questionnaire-based online studies were conducted. Study 1 drew three samples (n(n) = 391, n(p) = 215, and n(b) = 235) from the students at the University of Debrecen. It examined the factor structure, reliability, and internal consistency of the three differently worded scale versions. The positively worded scale version (MPSp) yielded a stable two-factor structure and demonstrated the best psychometric properties. Study 2 performed a confirmatory factor analysis on a sample drawn from public employees across the country (n(cfa) = 420). The two-factor solution in Study 1 was confirmed. χ(2) tests were not significant, and fit indices were excellent. There was no significant difference between the high-level construal subscale (F(hlc)) and the low-level construal subscale (F(llc)) in terms of factorial stability. Participant of Study 3 were students who did not take part in Study 1. The sample (n(inv) = 250) was tested for measurement invariance across gender. The scaled results supported strong/threshold invariance. Study 4 tested concurrent validity with 10 concurrent instruments. A sample of secondary school teachers (n(con) = 128) was tested by examining Spearman's rank order correlations. There was a significant difference in how the F(hlc) and F(llc) subscales predicted scores of some of the concurrent instruments. Further research is warranted into how the construal level of mindfulness scale items affects the recollection of the mindful experience. Overall, MPS(p) proved to be a valid short mindfulness measure. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8333280/ /pubmed/34366955 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626084 Text en Copyright © 2021 Lengyel, Keczeli, Orosz, Bács, Müller, Szőke and Bácsné Bába. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Lengyel, Attila
Keczeli, Danica
Orosz, Róbert
Bács, Zoltán
Müller, Anetta
Szőke, Szilvia
Bába, Éva Bácsné
Initial Validation of the Mindful Presence Scale: The Issue of the Construal Level of Scale Items
title Initial Validation of the Mindful Presence Scale: The Issue of the Construal Level of Scale Items
title_full Initial Validation of the Mindful Presence Scale: The Issue of the Construal Level of Scale Items
title_fullStr Initial Validation of the Mindful Presence Scale: The Issue of the Construal Level of Scale Items
title_full_unstemmed Initial Validation of the Mindful Presence Scale: The Issue of the Construal Level of Scale Items
title_short Initial Validation of the Mindful Presence Scale: The Issue of the Construal Level of Scale Items
title_sort initial validation of the mindful presence scale: the issue of the construal level of scale items
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8333280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34366955
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626084
work_keys_str_mv AT lengyelattila initialvalidationofthemindfulpresencescaletheissueoftheconstruallevelofscaleitems
AT keczelidanica initialvalidationofthemindfulpresencescaletheissueoftheconstruallevelofscaleitems
AT oroszrobert initialvalidationofthemindfulpresencescaletheissueoftheconstruallevelofscaleitems
AT bacszoltan initialvalidationofthemindfulpresencescaletheissueoftheconstruallevelofscaleitems
AT mulleranetta initialvalidationofthemindfulpresencescaletheissueoftheconstruallevelofscaleitems
AT szokeszilvia initialvalidationofthemindfulpresencescaletheissueoftheconstruallevelofscaleitems
AT babaevabacsne initialvalidationofthemindfulpresencescaletheissueoftheconstruallevelofscaleitems