Cargando…

Behavioural red-light sensitivity in fish according to the optomotor response

Various procedures have been adopted to investigate spectral sensitivity of animals, e.g. absorption spectra of visual pigments, electroretinography, optokinetic response, optomotor response (OMR) and phototaxis. The use of these techniques has led to various conclusions about animal vision. However...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsuo, Megumi, Kamei, Yasuhiro, Fukamachi, Shoji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8334835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34386255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210415
_version_ 1783733079670521856
author Matsuo, Megumi
Kamei, Yasuhiro
Fukamachi, Shoji
author_facet Matsuo, Megumi
Kamei, Yasuhiro
Fukamachi, Shoji
author_sort Matsuo, Megumi
collection PubMed
description Various procedures have been adopted to investigate spectral sensitivity of animals, e.g. absorption spectra of visual pigments, electroretinography, optokinetic response, optomotor response (OMR) and phototaxis. The use of these techniques has led to various conclusions about animal vision. However, visual sensitivity should be evaluated consistently for a reliable comparison. In this study, we retrieved behavioural data of several fish species using a single OMR procedure and compared their sensitivities to near-infrared light. Besides cavefish that lack eyes, some species were not appropriate for the OMR test because they either stayed still or changed swimming direction frequently. Eight of 13 fish species tested were OMR positive. Detailed analyses using medaka, goldfish, zebrafish, guppy, stickleback and cichlid revealed that all the fish were sensitive to light at a wavelength greater than or equal to 750 nm, where the threshold wavelengths varied from 750 to 880 nm. Fish opsin repertoire affected the perception of red light. By contrast, the copy number of long-wavelength-sensitive (LWS) genes did not necessarily improve red-light sensitivity. While the duplication of LWS and other cone opsin genes that has occurred extensively during fish evolution might not aid increasing spectral sensitivity, it may provide some other advantageous ophthalmic function, such as enhanced spectral discrimination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8334835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83348352021-08-11 Behavioural red-light sensitivity in fish according to the optomotor response Matsuo, Megumi Kamei, Yasuhiro Fukamachi, Shoji R Soc Open Sci Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Various procedures have been adopted to investigate spectral sensitivity of animals, e.g. absorption spectra of visual pigments, electroretinography, optokinetic response, optomotor response (OMR) and phototaxis. The use of these techniques has led to various conclusions about animal vision. However, visual sensitivity should be evaluated consistently for a reliable comparison. In this study, we retrieved behavioural data of several fish species using a single OMR procedure and compared their sensitivities to near-infrared light. Besides cavefish that lack eyes, some species were not appropriate for the OMR test because they either stayed still or changed swimming direction frequently. Eight of 13 fish species tested were OMR positive. Detailed analyses using medaka, goldfish, zebrafish, guppy, stickleback and cichlid revealed that all the fish were sensitive to light at a wavelength greater than or equal to 750 nm, where the threshold wavelengths varied from 750 to 880 nm. Fish opsin repertoire affected the perception of red light. By contrast, the copy number of long-wavelength-sensitive (LWS) genes did not necessarily improve red-light sensitivity. While the duplication of LWS and other cone opsin genes that has occurred extensively during fish evolution might not aid increasing spectral sensitivity, it may provide some other advantageous ophthalmic function, such as enhanced spectral discrimination. The Royal Society 2021-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8334835/ /pubmed/34386255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210415 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Organismal and Evolutionary Biology
Matsuo, Megumi
Kamei, Yasuhiro
Fukamachi, Shoji
Behavioural red-light sensitivity in fish according to the optomotor response
title Behavioural red-light sensitivity in fish according to the optomotor response
title_full Behavioural red-light sensitivity in fish according to the optomotor response
title_fullStr Behavioural red-light sensitivity in fish according to the optomotor response
title_full_unstemmed Behavioural red-light sensitivity in fish according to the optomotor response
title_short Behavioural red-light sensitivity in fish according to the optomotor response
title_sort behavioural red-light sensitivity in fish according to the optomotor response
topic Organismal and Evolutionary Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8334835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34386255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210415
work_keys_str_mv AT matsuomegumi behaviouralredlightsensitivityinfishaccordingtotheoptomotorresponse
AT kameiyasuhiro behaviouralredlightsensitivityinfishaccordingtotheoptomotorresponse
AT fukamachishoji behaviouralredlightsensitivityinfishaccordingtotheoptomotorresponse