Cargando…

Optimal Cut-Off Values of the Positive Lymph Node Ratio and the Number of Removed Nodes for Patients Receiving Resection of Bronchopulmonary Carcinoids: A Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis of the SEER Database

BACKGROUND: Although lymph node dissection (LND) has been commonly used for patients with bronchopulmonary carcinoids (PCs), the prognostic values of the positive lymph node ratio (PLNR) and the number of removed nodes (NRN) remain unclear. METHODS: Patients with resected PCs were identified in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Qichen, Li, Mingxia, Wang, Pan, Chen, Jinghua, Zhao, Hong, Zhao, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8335164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34367980
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.696732
_version_ 1783733091491119104
author Chen, Qichen
Li, Mingxia
Wang, Pan
Chen, Jinghua
Zhao, Hong
Zhao, Jun
author_facet Chen, Qichen
Li, Mingxia
Wang, Pan
Chen, Jinghua
Zhao, Hong
Zhao, Jun
author_sort Chen, Qichen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although lymph node dissection (LND) has been commonly used for patients with bronchopulmonary carcinoids (PCs), the prognostic values of the positive lymph node ratio (PLNR) and the number of removed nodes (NRN) remain unclear. METHODS: Patients with resected PCs were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010–2015). The optimal cut-off values of the PLNR and NRN were determined by X-tile. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to reduce the selection bias. IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients in different PLNR and NRN groups. RESULTS: The study included 1622 patients. The optimal cut-off values of the PLNR and NRN for survival were 13% and 13, respectively. In both Kaplan-Meier analysis and univariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis before IPTW, a PLNR ≥13% was significantly associated with worse OS (HR = 3.364, P<0.001) and worse CSS (HR = 7.874, P<0.001). These findings were corroborated by the IPTW-adjusted Cox analysis OS (HR = 2.358, P = 0.0275) and CSS (HR = 8.190, P<0.001) results. An NRN ≥13 was not significantly associated with worse OS in either the Kaplan-Meier or Cox analysis before or after IPTW adjustment. In the Cox proportional hazards analysis before and after IPTW adjustment, an NRN ≥13 was significantly associated with worse CSS (non-IPTW: HR = 2.216, P=0.013; IPTW-adjusted: HR = 2.162, P=0.024). CONCLUSION: A PLNR ≥13% could predict worse OS and CSS in patients with PCs and might be an important complement to the present PC staging system. Extensive LND with an NRN ≥13 might have no therapeutic value for OS and may even have an adverse influence on CSS. Its application should be considered on an individual basis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8335164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83351642021-08-05 Optimal Cut-Off Values of the Positive Lymph Node Ratio and the Number of Removed Nodes for Patients Receiving Resection of Bronchopulmonary Carcinoids: A Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis of the SEER Database Chen, Qichen Li, Mingxia Wang, Pan Chen, Jinghua Zhao, Hong Zhao, Jun Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Although lymph node dissection (LND) has been commonly used for patients with bronchopulmonary carcinoids (PCs), the prognostic values of the positive lymph node ratio (PLNR) and the number of removed nodes (NRN) remain unclear. METHODS: Patients with resected PCs were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010–2015). The optimal cut-off values of the PLNR and NRN were determined by X-tile. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to reduce the selection bias. IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients in different PLNR and NRN groups. RESULTS: The study included 1622 patients. The optimal cut-off values of the PLNR and NRN for survival were 13% and 13, respectively. In both Kaplan-Meier analysis and univariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis before IPTW, a PLNR ≥13% was significantly associated with worse OS (HR = 3.364, P<0.001) and worse CSS (HR = 7.874, P<0.001). These findings were corroborated by the IPTW-adjusted Cox analysis OS (HR = 2.358, P = 0.0275) and CSS (HR = 8.190, P<0.001) results. An NRN ≥13 was not significantly associated with worse OS in either the Kaplan-Meier or Cox analysis before or after IPTW adjustment. In the Cox proportional hazards analysis before and after IPTW adjustment, an NRN ≥13 was significantly associated with worse CSS (non-IPTW: HR = 2.216, P=0.013; IPTW-adjusted: HR = 2.162, P=0.024). CONCLUSION: A PLNR ≥13% could predict worse OS and CSS in patients with PCs and might be an important complement to the present PC staging system. Extensive LND with an NRN ≥13 might have no therapeutic value for OS and may even have an adverse influence on CSS. Its application should be considered on an individual basis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8335164/ /pubmed/34367980 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.696732 Text en Copyright © 2021 Chen, Li, Wang, Chen, Zhao and Zhao https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Chen, Qichen
Li, Mingxia
Wang, Pan
Chen, Jinghua
Zhao, Hong
Zhao, Jun
Optimal Cut-Off Values of the Positive Lymph Node Ratio and the Number of Removed Nodes for Patients Receiving Resection of Bronchopulmonary Carcinoids: A Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis of the SEER Database
title Optimal Cut-Off Values of the Positive Lymph Node Ratio and the Number of Removed Nodes for Patients Receiving Resection of Bronchopulmonary Carcinoids: A Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis of the SEER Database
title_full Optimal Cut-Off Values of the Positive Lymph Node Ratio and the Number of Removed Nodes for Patients Receiving Resection of Bronchopulmonary Carcinoids: A Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis of the SEER Database
title_fullStr Optimal Cut-Off Values of the Positive Lymph Node Ratio and the Number of Removed Nodes for Patients Receiving Resection of Bronchopulmonary Carcinoids: A Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis of the SEER Database
title_full_unstemmed Optimal Cut-Off Values of the Positive Lymph Node Ratio and the Number of Removed Nodes for Patients Receiving Resection of Bronchopulmonary Carcinoids: A Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis of the SEER Database
title_short Optimal Cut-Off Values of the Positive Lymph Node Ratio and the Number of Removed Nodes for Patients Receiving Resection of Bronchopulmonary Carcinoids: A Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis of the SEER Database
title_sort optimal cut-off values of the positive lymph node ratio and the number of removed nodes for patients receiving resection of bronchopulmonary carcinoids: a propensity score-weighted analysis of the seer database
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8335164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34367980
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.696732
work_keys_str_mv AT chenqichen optimalcutoffvaluesofthepositivelymphnoderatioandthenumberofremovednodesforpatientsreceivingresectionofbronchopulmonarycarcinoidsapropensityscoreweightedanalysisoftheseerdatabase
AT limingxia optimalcutoffvaluesofthepositivelymphnoderatioandthenumberofremovednodesforpatientsreceivingresectionofbronchopulmonarycarcinoidsapropensityscoreweightedanalysisoftheseerdatabase
AT wangpan optimalcutoffvaluesofthepositivelymphnoderatioandthenumberofremovednodesforpatientsreceivingresectionofbronchopulmonarycarcinoidsapropensityscoreweightedanalysisoftheseerdatabase
AT chenjinghua optimalcutoffvaluesofthepositivelymphnoderatioandthenumberofremovednodesforpatientsreceivingresectionofbronchopulmonarycarcinoidsapropensityscoreweightedanalysisoftheseerdatabase
AT zhaohong optimalcutoffvaluesofthepositivelymphnoderatioandthenumberofremovednodesforpatientsreceivingresectionofbronchopulmonarycarcinoidsapropensityscoreweightedanalysisoftheseerdatabase
AT zhaojun optimalcutoffvaluesofthepositivelymphnoderatioandthenumberofremovednodesforpatientsreceivingresectionofbronchopulmonarycarcinoidsapropensityscoreweightedanalysisoftheseerdatabase