Cargando…
Defining Unmet Need Following Lenalidomide Refractoriness: Real-World Evidence of Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Myeloma
BACKGROUND: The treatment paradigm for multiple myeloma (MM) continues to evolve with the development of novel therapies and the earlier adoption of continuous treatments into the treatment pathway. Lenalidomide-refractory patients now represent a challenge with inferior progression free survival (P...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8335564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34367987 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.703233 |
_version_ | 1783733136272654336 |
---|---|
author | Lecat, Catherine S. Y. Taube, Jessica B. Wilson, William Carmichael, Jonathan Parrish, Christopher Wallis, Gabriel Kyriakou, Charalampia Lee, Lydia Mahmood, Shameem Papanikolaou, Xenofon Rabin, Neil K. Sive, Jonathan Wechalekar, Ashutosh D. Yong, Kwee Cook, Gordon Popat, Rakesh |
author_facet | Lecat, Catherine S. Y. Taube, Jessica B. Wilson, William Carmichael, Jonathan Parrish, Christopher Wallis, Gabriel Kyriakou, Charalampia Lee, Lydia Mahmood, Shameem Papanikolaou, Xenofon Rabin, Neil K. Sive, Jonathan Wechalekar, Ashutosh D. Yong, Kwee Cook, Gordon Popat, Rakesh |
author_sort | Lecat, Catherine S. Y. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The treatment paradigm for multiple myeloma (MM) continues to evolve with the development of novel therapies and the earlier adoption of continuous treatments into the treatment pathway. Lenalidomide-refractory patients now represent a challenge with inferior progression free survival (PFS) reported to subsequent treatments. We therefore sought to describe the natural history of MM patients following lenalidomide in the real world. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort review of patients with relapsed MM who received lenalidomide-based treatments in the U.K. Data were collected for demographics, subsequent therapies, treatment responses, survival outcomes and clinical trial enrollment. RESULTS: 198 patients received lenalidomide-based treatments at a median of 2 prior lines of therapy at a median of 41 months (range 0.5-210) from diagnosis. 114 patients (72% of 158 evaluable) became refractory to lenalidomide. The overall survival (OS) after lenalidomide failure was 14.7 months having received between 0-6 subsequent lines of therapy. Few deep responses were observed with subsequent treatments and the PFS to each further line was < 7 months. There was a steep reduction in numbers of patients able to receive further treatment, with an associated increase in number of deaths. The OS of patients progressing on lenalidomide who did not enter a clinical trial incorporating novel agents was very poor (8.8 months versus 30 months, p 0.0002), although the trials group were a biologically fitter group. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate the poor outcomes of patients failing lenalidomide-based treatments in the real world, the highlight need for more effective treatments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8335564 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83355642021-08-05 Defining Unmet Need Following Lenalidomide Refractoriness: Real-World Evidence of Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Lecat, Catherine S. Y. Taube, Jessica B. Wilson, William Carmichael, Jonathan Parrish, Christopher Wallis, Gabriel Kyriakou, Charalampia Lee, Lydia Mahmood, Shameem Papanikolaou, Xenofon Rabin, Neil K. Sive, Jonathan Wechalekar, Ashutosh D. Yong, Kwee Cook, Gordon Popat, Rakesh Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: The treatment paradigm for multiple myeloma (MM) continues to evolve with the development of novel therapies and the earlier adoption of continuous treatments into the treatment pathway. Lenalidomide-refractory patients now represent a challenge with inferior progression free survival (PFS) reported to subsequent treatments. We therefore sought to describe the natural history of MM patients following lenalidomide in the real world. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort review of patients with relapsed MM who received lenalidomide-based treatments in the U.K. Data were collected for demographics, subsequent therapies, treatment responses, survival outcomes and clinical trial enrollment. RESULTS: 198 patients received lenalidomide-based treatments at a median of 2 prior lines of therapy at a median of 41 months (range 0.5-210) from diagnosis. 114 patients (72% of 158 evaluable) became refractory to lenalidomide. The overall survival (OS) after lenalidomide failure was 14.7 months having received between 0-6 subsequent lines of therapy. Few deep responses were observed with subsequent treatments and the PFS to each further line was < 7 months. There was a steep reduction in numbers of patients able to receive further treatment, with an associated increase in number of deaths. The OS of patients progressing on lenalidomide who did not enter a clinical trial incorporating novel agents was very poor (8.8 months versus 30 months, p 0.0002), although the trials group were a biologically fitter group. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate the poor outcomes of patients failing lenalidomide-based treatments in the real world, the highlight need for more effective treatments. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8335564/ /pubmed/34367987 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.703233 Text en Copyright © 2021 Lecat, Taube, Wilson, Carmichael, Parrish, Wallis, Kyriakou, Lee, Mahmood, Papanikolaou, Rabin, Sive, Wechalekar, Yong, Cook and Popat https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Lecat, Catherine S. Y. Taube, Jessica B. Wilson, William Carmichael, Jonathan Parrish, Christopher Wallis, Gabriel Kyriakou, Charalampia Lee, Lydia Mahmood, Shameem Papanikolaou, Xenofon Rabin, Neil K. Sive, Jonathan Wechalekar, Ashutosh D. Yong, Kwee Cook, Gordon Popat, Rakesh Defining Unmet Need Following Lenalidomide Refractoriness: Real-World Evidence of Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Myeloma |
title | Defining Unmet Need Following Lenalidomide Refractoriness: Real-World Evidence of Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Myeloma |
title_full | Defining Unmet Need Following Lenalidomide Refractoriness: Real-World Evidence of Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Myeloma |
title_fullStr | Defining Unmet Need Following Lenalidomide Refractoriness: Real-World Evidence of Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Myeloma |
title_full_unstemmed | Defining Unmet Need Following Lenalidomide Refractoriness: Real-World Evidence of Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Myeloma |
title_short | Defining Unmet Need Following Lenalidomide Refractoriness: Real-World Evidence of Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Myeloma |
title_sort | defining unmet need following lenalidomide refractoriness: real-world evidence of outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8335564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34367987 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.703233 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lecatcatherinesy definingunmetneedfollowinglenalidomiderefractorinessrealworldevidenceofoutcomesinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT taubejessicab definingunmetneedfollowinglenalidomiderefractorinessrealworldevidenceofoutcomesinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT wilsonwilliam definingunmetneedfollowinglenalidomiderefractorinessrealworldevidenceofoutcomesinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT carmichaeljonathan definingunmetneedfollowinglenalidomiderefractorinessrealworldevidenceofoutcomesinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT parrishchristopher definingunmetneedfollowinglenalidomiderefractorinessrealworldevidenceofoutcomesinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT wallisgabriel definingunmetneedfollowinglenalidomiderefractorinessrealworldevidenceofoutcomesinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT kyriakoucharalampia definingunmetneedfollowinglenalidomiderefractorinessrealworldevidenceofoutcomesinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT leelydia definingunmetneedfollowinglenalidomiderefractorinessrealworldevidenceofoutcomesinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT mahmoodshameem definingunmetneedfollowinglenalidomiderefractorinessrealworldevidenceofoutcomesinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT papanikolaouxenofon definingunmetneedfollowinglenalidomiderefractorinessrealworldevidenceofoutcomesinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT rabinneilk definingunmetneedfollowinglenalidomiderefractorinessrealworldevidenceofoutcomesinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT sivejonathan definingunmetneedfollowinglenalidomiderefractorinessrealworldevidenceofoutcomesinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT wechalekarashutoshd definingunmetneedfollowinglenalidomiderefractorinessrealworldevidenceofoutcomesinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT yongkwee definingunmetneedfollowinglenalidomiderefractorinessrealworldevidenceofoutcomesinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT cookgordon definingunmetneedfollowinglenalidomiderefractorinessrealworldevidenceofoutcomesinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT popatrakesh definingunmetneedfollowinglenalidomiderefractorinessrealworldevidenceofoutcomesinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma |