Cargando…

Associations Between Methods of Meeting Sexual Partners and Sexual Practices Among Heterosexuals: Cross-sectional Study in Melbourne, Australia

BACKGROUND: The association between meeting partners on the web and sexual practices has been understudied in heterosexuals. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the associations between the methods of meeting partners and sexual practices and HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in heter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Constantinou, Heidi, Fairley, Christopher K, Hocking, Jane S, Bradshaw, Catriona S, Choi, Edmond P H, Maddaford, Kate, Phillips, Tiffany R, Chow, Eric P F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8335617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34283024
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26202
_version_ 1783733148232712192
author Constantinou, Heidi
Fairley, Christopher K
Hocking, Jane S
Bradshaw, Catriona S
Choi, Edmond P H
Maddaford, Kate
Phillips, Tiffany R
Chow, Eric P F
author_facet Constantinou, Heidi
Fairley, Christopher K
Hocking, Jane S
Bradshaw, Catriona S
Choi, Edmond P H
Maddaford, Kate
Phillips, Tiffany R
Chow, Eric P F
author_sort Constantinou, Heidi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The association between meeting partners on the web and sexual practices has been understudied in heterosexuals. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the associations between the methods of meeting partners and sexual practices and HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in heterosexuals. METHODS: We conducted a survey among heterosexuals attending the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre in 2019. This survey asked about the methods through which the participants engaged in meeting their sexual partners, sexual practices, and intravenous drug use (IVDU) over the past 3 months. The participants’ HIV and STI (chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis) status was obtained from clinical testing. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between each method of meeting and the participants’ sexual practices, IVDU, and STI status. RESULTS: A total of 698 participants (325 men and 373 women) were included in the study. Most of the participants reported using only one method to meet partners (222/325, 68.3% men; 245/373, 65.7% women; P=.05). The men met partners most commonly at social venues (eg, bar, pub, or party; 126/325, 38.8%), whereas the women met partners most commonly through friends or family (178/373, 47.7%). Paying for sex was associated with men meeting partners at sex venues (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 145.34, 95% CI 26.13-808.51) and on the internet (AOR 10.00, 95% CI 3.61-27.55). There was no association between IVDU and methods of meeting. Social venues were associated with condomless vaginal sex among men (AOR 3.31, 95% CI 1.94-5.71) and women (AOR 2.58, 95% CI 1.61-4.13) and testing positive for STI among men (AOR 3.04, 95% CI 1.24-7.48) and women (AOR 3.75, 95% CI 1.58-8.89). CONCLUSIONS: Heterosexuals who met partners at social venues had a more than threefold risk of testing positive for STIs, indicating that heterosexuals may benefit from health promotion campaigns that are delivered through a public setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8335617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83356172021-08-20 Associations Between Methods of Meeting Sexual Partners and Sexual Practices Among Heterosexuals: Cross-sectional Study in Melbourne, Australia Constantinou, Heidi Fairley, Christopher K Hocking, Jane S Bradshaw, Catriona S Choi, Edmond P H Maddaford, Kate Phillips, Tiffany R Chow, Eric P F JMIR Form Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: The association between meeting partners on the web and sexual practices has been understudied in heterosexuals. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the associations between the methods of meeting partners and sexual practices and HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in heterosexuals. METHODS: We conducted a survey among heterosexuals attending the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre in 2019. This survey asked about the methods through which the participants engaged in meeting their sexual partners, sexual practices, and intravenous drug use (IVDU) over the past 3 months. The participants’ HIV and STI (chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis) status was obtained from clinical testing. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between each method of meeting and the participants’ sexual practices, IVDU, and STI status. RESULTS: A total of 698 participants (325 men and 373 women) were included in the study. Most of the participants reported using only one method to meet partners (222/325, 68.3% men; 245/373, 65.7% women; P=.05). The men met partners most commonly at social venues (eg, bar, pub, or party; 126/325, 38.8%), whereas the women met partners most commonly through friends or family (178/373, 47.7%). Paying for sex was associated with men meeting partners at sex venues (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 145.34, 95% CI 26.13-808.51) and on the internet (AOR 10.00, 95% CI 3.61-27.55). There was no association between IVDU and methods of meeting. Social venues were associated with condomless vaginal sex among men (AOR 3.31, 95% CI 1.94-5.71) and women (AOR 2.58, 95% CI 1.61-4.13) and testing positive for STI among men (AOR 3.04, 95% CI 1.24-7.48) and women (AOR 3.75, 95% CI 1.58-8.89). CONCLUSIONS: Heterosexuals who met partners at social venues had a more than threefold risk of testing positive for STIs, indicating that heterosexuals may benefit from health promotion campaigns that are delivered through a public setting. JMIR Publications 2021-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8335617/ /pubmed/34283024 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26202 Text en ©Heidi Constantinou, Christopher K Fairley, Jane S Hocking, Catriona S Bradshaw, Edmond P H Choi, Kate Maddaford, Tiffany R Phillips, Eric P F Chow. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 20.07.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Constantinou, Heidi
Fairley, Christopher K
Hocking, Jane S
Bradshaw, Catriona S
Choi, Edmond P H
Maddaford, Kate
Phillips, Tiffany R
Chow, Eric P F
Associations Between Methods of Meeting Sexual Partners and Sexual Practices Among Heterosexuals: Cross-sectional Study in Melbourne, Australia
title Associations Between Methods of Meeting Sexual Partners and Sexual Practices Among Heterosexuals: Cross-sectional Study in Melbourne, Australia
title_full Associations Between Methods of Meeting Sexual Partners and Sexual Practices Among Heterosexuals: Cross-sectional Study in Melbourne, Australia
title_fullStr Associations Between Methods of Meeting Sexual Partners and Sexual Practices Among Heterosexuals: Cross-sectional Study in Melbourne, Australia
title_full_unstemmed Associations Between Methods of Meeting Sexual Partners and Sexual Practices Among Heterosexuals: Cross-sectional Study in Melbourne, Australia
title_short Associations Between Methods of Meeting Sexual Partners and Sexual Practices Among Heterosexuals: Cross-sectional Study in Melbourne, Australia
title_sort associations between methods of meeting sexual partners and sexual practices among heterosexuals: cross-sectional study in melbourne, australia
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8335617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34283024
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26202
work_keys_str_mv AT constantinouheidi associationsbetweenmethodsofmeetingsexualpartnersandsexualpracticesamongheterosexualscrosssectionalstudyinmelbourneaustralia
AT fairleychristopherk associationsbetweenmethodsofmeetingsexualpartnersandsexualpracticesamongheterosexualscrosssectionalstudyinmelbourneaustralia
AT hockingjanes associationsbetweenmethodsofmeetingsexualpartnersandsexualpracticesamongheterosexualscrosssectionalstudyinmelbourneaustralia
AT bradshawcatrionas associationsbetweenmethodsofmeetingsexualpartnersandsexualpracticesamongheterosexualscrosssectionalstudyinmelbourneaustralia
AT choiedmondph associationsbetweenmethodsofmeetingsexualpartnersandsexualpracticesamongheterosexualscrosssectionalstudyinmelbourneaustralia
AT maddafordkate associationsbetweenmethodsofmeetingsexualpartnersandsexualpracticesamongheterosexualscrosssectionalstudyinmelbourneaustralia
AT phillipstiffanyr associationsbetweenmethodsofmeetingsexualpartnersandsexualpracticesamongheterosexualscrosssectionalstudyinmelbourneaustralia
AT chowericpf associationsbetweenmethodsofmeetingsexualpartnersandsexualpracticesamongheterosexualscrosssectionalstudyinmelbourneaustralia