Cargando…
Associations Between Methods of Meeting Sexual Partners and Sexual Practices Among Heterosexuals: Cross-sectional Study in Melbourne, Australia
BACKGROUND: The association between meeting partners on the web and sexual practices has been understudied in heterosexuals. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the associations between the methods of meeting partners and sexual practices and HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in heter...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8335617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34283024 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26202 |
_version_ | 1783733148232712192 |
---|---|
author | Constantinou, Heidi Fairley, Christopher K Hocking, Jane S Bradshaw, Catriona S Choi, Edmond P H Maddaford, Kate Phillips, Tiffany R Chow, Eric P F |
author_facet | Constantinou, Heidi Fairley, Christopher K Hocking, Jane S Bradshaw, Catriona S Choi, Edmond P H Maddaford, Kate Phillips, Tiffany R Chow, Eric P F |
author_sort | Constantinou, Heidi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The association between meeting partners on the web and sexual practices has been understudied in heterosexuals. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the associations between the methods of meeting partners and sexual practices and HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in heterosexuals. METHODS: We conducted a survey among heterosexuals attending the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre in 2019. This survey asked about the methods through which the participants engaged in meeting their sexual partners, sexual practices, and intravenous drug use (IVDU) over the past 3 months. The participants’ HIV and STI (chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis) status was obtained from clinical testing. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between each method of meeting and the participants’ sexual practices, IVDU, and STI status. RESULTS: A total of 698 participants (325 men and 373 women) were included in the study. Most of the participants reported using only one method to meet partners (222/325, 68.3% men; 245/373, 65.7% women; P=.05). The men met partners most commonly at social venues (eg, bar, pub, or party; 126/325, 38.8%), whereas the women met partners most commonly through friends or family (178/373, 47.7%). Paying for sex was associated with men meeting partners at sex venues (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 145.34, 95% CI 26.13-808.51) and on the internet (AOR 10.00, 95% CI 3.61-27.55). There was no association between IVDU and methods of meeting. Social venues were associated with condomless vaginal sex among men (AOR 3.31, 95% CI 1.94-5.71) and women (AOR 2.58, 95% CI 1.61-4.13) and testing positive for STI among men (AOR 3.04, 95% CI 1.24-7.48) and women (AOR 3.75, 95% CI 1.58-8.89). CONCLUSIONS: Heterosexuals who met partners at social venues had a more than threefold risk of testing positive for STIs, indicating that heterosexuals may benefit from health promotion campaigns that are delivered through a public setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8335617 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83356172021-08-20 Associations Between Methods of Meeting Sexual Partners and Sexual Practices Among Heterosexuals: Cross-sectional Study in Melbourne, Australia Constantinou, Heidi Fairley, Christopher K Hocking, Jane S Bradshaw, Catriona S Choi, Edmond P H Maddaford, Kate Phillips, Tiffany R Chow, Eric P F JMIR Form Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: The association between meeting partners on the web and sexual practices has been understudied in heterosexuals. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the associations between the methods of meeting partners and sexual practices and HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in heterosexuals. METHODS: We conducted a survey among heterosexuals attending the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre in 2019. This survey asked about the methods through which the participants engaged in meeting their sexual partners, sexual practices, and intravenous drug use (IVDU) over the past 3 months. The participants’ HIV and STI (chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis) status was obtained from clinical testing. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between each method of meeting and the participants’ sexual practices, IVDU, and STI status. RESULTS: A total of 698 participants (325 men and 373 women) were included in the study. Most of the participants reported using only one method to meet partners (222/325, 68.3% men; 245/373, 65.7% women; P=.05). The men met partners most commonly at social venues (eg, bar, pub, or party; 126/325, 38.8%), whereas the women met partners most commonly through friends or family (178/373, 47.7%). Paying for sex was associated with men meeting partners at sex venues (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 145.34, 95% CI 26.13-808.51) and on the internet (AOR 10.00, 95% CI 3.61-27.55). There was no association between IVDU and methods of meeting. Social venues were associated with condomless vaginal sex among men (AOR 3.31, 95% CI 1.94-5.71) and women (AOR 2.58, 95% CI 1.61-4.13) and testing positive for STI among men (AOR 3.04, 95% CI 1.24-7.48) and women (AOR 3.75, 95% CI 1.58-8.89). CONCLUSIONS: Heterosexuals who met partners at social venues had a more than threefold risk of testing positive for STIs, indicating that heterosexuals may benefit from health promotion campaigns that are delivered through a public setting. JMIR Publications 2021-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8335617/ /pubmed/34283024 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26202 Text en ©Heidi Constantinou, Christopher K Fairley, Jane S Hocking, Catriona S Bradshaw, Edmond P H Choi, Kate Maddaford, Tiffany R Phillips, Eric P F Chow. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 20.07.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Constantinou, Heidi Fairley, Christopher K Hocking, Jane S Bradshaw, Catriona S Choi, Edmond P H Maddaford, Kate Phillips, Tiffany R Chow, Eric P F Associations Between Methods of Meeting Sexual Partners and Sexual Practices Among Heterosexuals: Cross-sectional Study in Melbourne, Australia |
title | Associations Between Methods of Meeting Sexual Partners and Sexual Practices Among Heterosexuals: Cross-sectional Study in Melbourne, Australia |
title_full | Associations Between Methods of Meeting Sexual Partners and Sexual Practices Among Heterosexuals: Cross-sectional Study in Melbourne, Australia |
title_fullStr | Associations Between Methods of Meeting Sexual Partners and Sexual Practices Among Heterosexuals: Cross-sectional Study in Melbourne, Australia |
title_full_unstemmed | Associations Between Methods of Meeting Sexual Partners and Sexual Practices Among Heterosexuals: Cross-sectional Study in Melbourne, Australia |
title_short | Associations Between Methods of Meeting Sexual Partners and Sexual Practices Among Heterosexuals: Cross-sectional Study in Melbourne, Australia |
title_sort | associations between methods of meeting sexual partners and sexual practices among heterosexuals: cross-sectional study in melbourne, australia |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8335617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34283024 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26202 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT constantinouheidi associationsbetweenmethodsofmeetingsexualpartnersandsexualpracticesamongheterosexualscrosssectionalstudyinmelbourneaustralia AT fairleychristopherk associationsbetweenmethodsofmeetingsexualpartnersandsexualpracticesamongheterosexualscrosssectionalstudyinmelbourneaustralia AT hockingjanes associationsbetweenmethodsofmeetingsexualpartnersandsexualpracticesamongheterosexualscrosssectionalstudyinmelbourneaustralia AT bradshawcatrionas associationsbetweenmethodsofmeetingsexualpartnersandsexualpracticesamongheterosexualscrosssectionalstudyinmelbourneaustralia AT choiedmondph associationsbetweenmethodsofmeetingsexualpartnersandsexualpracticesamongheterosexualscrosssectionalstudyinmelbourneaustralia AT maddafordkate associationsbetweenmethodsofmeetingsexualpartnersandsexualpracticesamongheterosexualscrosssectionalstudyinmelbourneaustralia AT phillipstiffanyr associationsbetweenmethodsofmeetingsexualpartnersandsexualpracticesamongheterosexualscrosssectionalstudyinmelbourneaustralia AT chowericpf associationsbetweenmethodsofmeetingsexualpartnersandsexualpracticesamongheterosexualscrosssectionalstudyinmelbourneaustralia |