Cargando…

Has tumor doubling time in breast cancer changed over the past 80 years? A systematic review

Over the past century, epidemiologic changes and implementation of screening may have had an impact on tumor doubling time in breast cancer. Our study was designed to evaluate changes in tumor doubling time in breast cancer over the past 80 years. A systematic review of published literature and meta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dahan, Meryl, Hequet, Delphine, Bonneau, Claire, Paoletti, Xavier, Rouzier, Roman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8335823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34264009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3939
_version_ 1783733202799558656
author Dahan, Meryl
Hequet, Delphine
Bonneau, Claire
Paoletti, Xavier
Rouzier, Roman
author_facet Dahan, Meryl
Hequet, Delphine
Bonneau, Claire
Paoletti, Xavier
Rouzier, Roman
author_sort Dahan, Meryl
collection PubMed
description Over the past century, epidemiologic changes and implementation of screening may have had an impact on tumor doubling time in breast cancer. Our study was designed to evaluate changes in tumor doubling time in breast cancer over the past 80 years. A systematic review of published literature and meta‐regression analysis was performed. An online electronic database search was undertaken using the PubMed platform from inception until June 2020. All studies that measured tumor doubling time in breast cancer were included. A total of 151 publications were retrieved. Among them, 16 full‐text articles were included in the qualitative analysis. An exponential growth model was used for quantitative characterization of tumor growth rate. Tumor doubling time has remained stable over the past 80 years. Recent studies have not only identified “fast growing tumor” (grade 3, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‐positive, triple‐negative, or tumor with an elevated Ki‐67) but also “inactive breast cancer” feeding the ongoing debate of overdiagnosis due to screening programs. The stability of tumor doubling time over the past 80 years, despite increasing and changing risk factors, supports the validity for our screening guidelines. Prospective studies based on more precise measurement of tumor size and adjustment for tumor characteristics are necessary to more clearly characterize the prognostic and predictive impact of tumor doubling time in breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8335823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83358232021-08-09 Has tumor doubling time in breast cancer changed over the past 80 years? A systematic review Dahan, Meryl Hequet, Delphine Bonneau, Claire Paoletti, Xavier Rouzier, Roman Cancer Med Cancer Biology Over the past century, epidemiologic changes and implementation of screening may have had an impact on tumor doubling time in breast cancer. Our study was designed to evaluate changes in tumor doubling time in breast cancer over the past 80 years. A systematic review of published literature and meta‐regression analysis was performed. An online electronic database search was undertaken using the PubMed platform from inception until June 2020. All studies that measured tumor doubling time in breast cancer were included. A total of 151 publications were retrieved. Among them, 16 full‐text articles were included in the qualitative analysis. An exponential growth model was used for quantitative characterization of tumor growth rate. Tumor doubling time has remained stable over the past 80 years. Recent studies have not only identified “fast growing tumor” (grade 3, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‐positive, triple‐negative, or tumor with an elevated Ki‐67) but also “inactive breast cancer” feeding the ongoing debate of overdiagnosis due to screening programs. The stability of tumor doubling time over the past 80 years, despite increasing and changing risk factors, supports the validity for our screening guidelines. Prospective studies based on more precise measurement of tumor size and adjustment for tumor characteristics are necessary to more clearly characterize the prognostic and predictive impact of tumor doubling time in breast cancer. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8335823/ /pubmed/34264009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3939 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cancer Biology
Dahan, Meryl
Hequet, Delphine
Bonneau, Claire
Paoletti, Xavier
Rouzier, Roman
Has tumor doubling time in breast cancer changed over the past 80 years? A systematic review
title Has tumor doubling time in breast cancer changed over the past 80 years? A systematic review
title_full Has tumor doubling time in breast cancer changed over the past 80 years? A systematic review
title_fullStr Has tumor doubling time in breast cancer changed over the past 80 years? A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Has tumor doubling time in breast cancer changed over the past 80 years? A systematic review
title_short Has tumor doubling time in breast cancer changed over the past 80 years? A systematic review
title_sort has tumor doubling time in breast cancer changed over the past 80 years? a systematic review
topic Cancer Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8335823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34264009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3939
work_keys_str_mv AT dahanmeryl hastumordoublingtimeinbreastcancerchangedoverthepast80yearsasystematicreview
AT hequetdelphine hastumordoublingtimeinbreastcancerchangedoverthepast80yearsasystematicreview
AT bonneauclaire hastumordoublingtimeinbreastcancerchangedoverthepast80yearsasystematicreview
AT paolettixavier hastumordoublingtimeinbreastcancerchangedoverthepast80yearsasystematicreview
AT rouzierroman hastumordoublingtimeinbreastcancerchangedoverthepast80yearsasystematicreview