Cargando…
Are We in a De‐Globalization Process? The Evidence from Global Trade During 2007–2017
Through the analysis of statistical data, some scholars believe that the globalization of trade is declining, and de‐globalization has become a trend, even since the financial crisis in 2008. However, the superficial decline of global trade volume cannot be taken as a corollary of the de‐globalizati...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8335849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34377531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202000096 |
_version_ | 1783733208153587712 |
---|---|
author | Li, Xiaomeng Shen, Chen Cai, Hongbo Chen, Qinghua |
author_facet | Li, Xiaomeng Shen, Chen Cai, Hongbo Chen, Qinghua |
author_sort | Li, Xiaomeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | Through the analysis of statistical data, some scholars believe that the globalization of trade is declining, and de‐globalization has become a trend, even since the financial crisis in 2008. However, the superficial decline of global trade volume cannot be taken as a corollary of the de‐globalization. It needs go deep into the structural analysis, and “globalization or de‐globalization” should be discussed by analyzing whether the global trade structure has changed. This paper finds that during 2007–2017, the global trade resistances are clearly classified, and trade resistance in the global community has increased significantly. Second, an expectation maximization (EM) algorithm is applied to divide global trade relations into two categories: intimate trade relations, whose barriers are mainly related to geographical distance; and unfriendly trade relations with high artificial barriers. Third, the trade purity indicator (TPI) is introduced to describe the trade environment of countries, and its evolution indicates after the financial crisis and for quite a long time, the structure of global trade has not changed much. And it shows some deterioration trend and structural adjustment after 2015, which indicates an opportunity for the emergence of de‐globalization in such an international environment full of uncertainty and challenges. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8335849 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83358492021-08-09 Are We in a De‐Globalization Process? The Evidence from Global Trade During 2007–2017 Li, Xiaomeng Shen, Chen Cai, Hongbo Chen, Qinghua Glob Chall Full Papers Through the analysis of statistical data, some scholars believe that the globalization of trade is declining, and de‐globalization has become a trend, even since the financial crisis in 2008. However, the superficial decline of global trade volume cannot be taken as a corollary of the de‐globalization. It needs go deep into the structural analysis, and “globalization or de‐globalization” should be discussed by analyzing whether the global trade structure has changed. This paper finds that during 2007–2017, the global trade resistances are clearly classified, and trade resistance in the global community has increased significantly. Second, an expectation maximization (EM) algorithm is applied to divide global trade relations into two categories: intimate trade relations, whose barriers are mainly related to geographical distance; and unfriendly trade relations with high artificial barriers. Third, the trade purity indicator (TPI) is introduced to describe the trade environment of countries, and its evolution indicates after the financial crisis and for quite a long time, the structure of global trade has not changed much. And it shows some deterioration trend and structural adjustment after 2015, which indicates an opportunity for the emergence of de‐globalization in such an international environment full of uncertainty and challenges. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8335849/ /pubmed/34377531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202000096 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Global Challenges published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Full Papers Li, Xiaomeng Shen, Chen Cai, Hongbo Chen, Qinghua Are We in a De‐Globalization Process? The Evidence from Global Trade During 2007–2017 |
title | Are We in a De‐Globalization Process? The Evidence from Global Trade During 2007–2017 |
title_full | Are We in a De‐Globalization Process? The Evidence from Global Trade During 2007–2017 |
title_fullStr | Are We in a De‐Globalization Process? The Evidence from Global Trade During 2007–2017 |
title_full_unstemmed | Are We in a De‐Globalization Process? The Evidence from Global Trade During 2007–2017 |
title_short | Are We in a De‐Globalization Process? The Evidence from Global Trade During 2007–2017 |
title_sort | are we in a de‐globalization process? the evidence from global trade during 2007–2017 |
topic | Full Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8335849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34377531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202000096 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lixiaomeng areweinadeglobalizationprocesstheevidencefromglobaltradeduring20072017 AT shenchen areweinadeglobalizationprocesstheevidencefromglobaltradeduring20072017 AT caihongbo areweinadeglobalizationprocesstheevidencefromglobaltradeduring20072017 AT chenqinghua areweinadeglobalizationprocesstheevidencefromglobaltradeduring20072017 |