Cargando…

Are We in a De‐Globalization Process? The Evidence from Global Trade During 2007–2017

Through the analysis of statistical data, some scholars believe that the globalization of trade is declining, and de‐globalization has become a trend, even since the financial crisis in 2008. However, the superficial decline of global trade volume cannot be taken as a corollary of the de‐globalizati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xiaomeng, Shen, Chen, Cai, Hongbo, Chen, Qinghua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8335849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34377531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202000096
_version_ 1783733208153587712
author Li, Xiaomeng
Shen, Chen
Cai, Hongbo
Chen, Qinghua
author_facet Li, Xiaomeng
Shen, Chen
Cai, Hongbo
Chen, Qinghua
author_sort Li, Xiaomeng
collection PubMed
description Through the analysis of statistical data, some scholars believe that the globalization of trade is declining, and de‐globalization has become a trend, even since the financial crisis in 2008. However, the superficial decline of global trade volume cannot be taken as a corollary of the de‐globalization. It needs go deep into the structural analysis, and “globalization or de‐globalization” should be discussed by analyzing whether the global trade structure has changed. This paper finds that during 2007–2017, the global trade resistances are clearly classified, and trade resistance in the global community has increased significantly. Second, an expectation maximization (EM) algorithm is applied to divide global trade relations into two categories: intimate trade relations, whose barriers are mainly related to geographical distance; and unfriendly trade relations with high artificial barriers. Third, the trade purity indicator (TPI) is introduced to describe the trade environment of countries, and its evolution indicates after the financial crisis and for quite a long time, the structure of global trade has not changed much. And it shows some deterioration trend and structural adjustment after 2015, which indicates an opportunity for the emergence of de‐globalization in such an international environment full of uncertainty and challenges.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8335849
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83358492021-08-09 Are We in a De‐Globalization Process? The Evidence from Global Trade During 2007–2017 Li, Xiaomeng Shen, Chen Cai, Hongbo Chen, Qinghua Glob Chall Full Papers Through the analysis of statistical data, some scholars believe that the globalization of trade is declining, and de‐globalization has become a trend, even since the financial crisis in 2008. However, the superficial decline of global trade volume cannot be taken as a corollary of the de‐globalization. It needs go deep into the structural analysis, and “globalization or de‐globalization” should be discussed by analyzing whether the global trade structure has changed. This paper finds that during 2007–2017, the global trade resistances are clearly classified, and trade resistance in the global community has increased significantly. Second, an expectation maximization (EM) algorithm is applied to divide global trade relations into two categories: intimate trade relations, whose barriers are mainly related to geographical distance; and unfriendly trade relations with high artificial barriers. Third, the trade purity indicator (TPI) is introduced to describe the trade environment of countries, and its evolution indicates after the financial crisis and for quite a long time, the structure of global trade has not changed much. And it shows some deterioration trend and structural adjustment after 2015, which indicates an opportunity for the emergence of de‐globalization in such an international environment full of uncertainty and challenges. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8335849/ /pubmed/34377531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202000096 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Global Challenges published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Papers
Li, Xiaomeng
Shen, Chen
Cai, Hongbo
Chen, Qinghua
Are We in a De‐Globalization Process? The Evidence from Global Trade During 2007–2017
title Are We in a De‐Globalization Process? The Evidence from Global Trade During 2007–2017
title_full Are We in a De‐Globalization Process? The Evidence from Global Trade During 2007–2017
title_fullStr Are We in a De‐Globalization Process? The Evidence from Global Trade During 2007–2017
title_full_unstemmed Are We in a De‐Globalization Process? The Evidence from Global Trade During 2007–2017
title_short Are We in a De‐Globalization Process? The Evidence from Global Trade During 2007–2017
title_sort are we in a de‐globalization process? the evidence from global trade during 2007–2017
topic Full Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8335849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34377531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202000096
work_keys_str_mv AT lixiaomeng areweinadeglobalizationprocesstheevidencefromglobaltradeduring20072017
AT shenchen areweinadeglobalizationprocesstheevidencefromglobaltradeduring20072017
AT caihongbo areweinadeglobalizationprocesstheevidencefromglobaltradeduring20072017
AT chenqinghua areweinadeglobalizationprocesstheevidencefromglobaltradeduring20072017