Cargando…

Does the protocol-required uniform margin around the CTV adequately account for setup inaccuracies in whole breast irradiation?

PURPOSE: To use cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging to determine the impacts of patient characteristics on the magnitude of geometric setup errors and obtain patient-specific planning target volume (PTV) margins from the correlated patient characteristics in whole breast irradiation (WBI)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luo, Jurui, Yin, Zhihai, Zhang, Zhen, Guo, Xiaomao, Yu, Xiaoli, Wang, Juanqi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8336062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34344403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01863-w
_version_ 1783733252724359168
author Luo, Jurui
Yin, Zhihai
Zhang, Zhen
Guo, Xiaomao
Yu, Xiaoli
Wang, Juanqi
author_facet Luo, Jurui
Yin, Zhihai
Zhang, Zhen
Guo, Xiaomao
Yu, Xiaoli
Wang, Juanqi
author_sort Luo, Jurui
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To use cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging to determine the impacts of patient characteristics on the magnitude of geometric setup errors and obtain patient-specific planning target volume (PTV) margins from the correlated patient characteristics in whole breast irradiation (WBI). METHODS: Between January 2019 and December 2019, a total of 97 patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery, followed by intensity-modulated radiation therapy in WBI, were scanned with pre-treatment CBCT for the first three treatment fractions and weekly for the subsequent fractions. Setup errors in the left–right (LR), superior–inferior (SI) and anterior–posterior (AP) directions were recorded and analyzed with patient characteristics—including age, tumor location, body mass index (BMI), chest circumference (CC) and breast volume (BV)—to examine the predictors for setup errors and obtain specific PTV margins. RESULTS: A total of 679 CBCT images from 97 patients were acquired for analysis. The mean setup errors for the whole group were 2.32 ± 1.21 mm, 3.71 ± 2.21 mm and 2.75 ± 1.56 mm in the LR, SI and AP directions, respectively. Patients’ BMI, CC and BV were moderately associated with setup errors, especially in the SI directions (R = 0.40, 0.43 and 0.22, respectively). Setup errors in the SI directions for patients with BMI > 23.8 kg/m(2), CC > 89 cm and BV > 657 cm(3) were 4.56 ± 2.59 mm, 4.77 ± 2.42 mm and 4.30 ± 2.43 mm, respectively, which were significantly greater than those of patients with BMI ≤ 23.8 kg/m(2), CC ≤ 89 cm and BV ≤ 657 cm(3) (P < 0.05). Correspondingly, the calculated PTV margins in patients with BMI > 23.8 kg/m(2), CC > 89 cm and BV > 657 cm(3) were 4.25/7.95/4.93 mm, 4.37/7.66/5.24 mm and 4.22/7.54/5.29 mm in the LR/SI/AP directions, respectively, compared with 3.64/4.64/5.09 mm, 3.31/4.50/4.82 mm and 3.29/5.74/4.73 mm for BMI ≤ 23.8 kg/m(2), CC ≤ 89 cm and BV ≤ 657 cm(3), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of geometric setup errors was moderately correlated with BMI, CC and BV. It was recommended to set patient-specific PTV margins according to patient characteristics in the absence of daily image-guided treatment setup.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8336062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83360622021-08-04 Does the protocol-required uniform margin around the CTV adequately account for setup inaccuracies in whole breast irradiation? Luo, Jurui Yin, Zhihai Zhang, Zhen Guo, Xiaomao Yu, Xiaoli Wang, Juanqi Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: To use cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging to determine the impacts of patient characteristics on the magnitude of geometric setup errors and obtain patient-specific planning target volume (PTV) margins from the correlated patient characteristics in whole breast irradiation (WBI). METHODS: Between January 2019 and December 2019, a total of 97 patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery, followed by intensity-modulated radiation therapy in WBI, were scanned with pre-treatment CBCT for the first three treatment fractions and weekly for the subsequent fractions. Setup errors in the left–right (LR), superior–inferior (SI) and anterior–posterior (AP) directions were recorded and analyzed with patient characteristics—including age, tumor location, body mass index (BMI), chest circumference (CC) and breast volume (BV)—to examine the predictors for setup errors and obtain specific PTV margins. RESULTS: A total of 679 CBCT images from 97 patients were acquired for analysis. The mean setup errors for the whole group were 2.32 ± 1.21 mm, 3.71 ± 2.21 mm and 2.75 ± 1.56 mm in the LR, SI and AP directions, respectively. Patients’ BMI, CC and BV were moderately associated with setup errors, especially in the SI directions (R = 0.40, 0.43 and 0.22, respectively). Setup errors in the SI directions for patients with BMI > 23.8 kg/m(2), CC > 89 cm and BV > 657 cm(3) were 4.56 ± 2.59 mm, 4.77 ± 2.42 mm and 4.30 ± 2.43 mm, respectively, which were significantly greater than those of patients with BMI ≤ 23.8 kg/m(2), CC ≤ 89 cm and BV ≤ 657 cm(3) (P < 0.05). Correspondingly, the calculated PTV margins in patients with BMI > 23.8 kg/m(2), CC > 89 cm and BV > 657 cm(3) were 4.25/7.95/4.93 mm, 4.37/7.66/5.24 mm and 4.22/7.54/5.29 mm in the LR/SI/AP directions, respectively, compared with 3.64/4.64/5.09 mm, 3.31/4.50/4.82 mm and 3.29/5.74/4.73 mm for BMI ≤ 23.8 kg/m(2), CC ≤ 89 cm and BV ≤ 657 cm(3), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of geometric setup errors was moderately correlated with BMI, CC and BV. It was recommended to set patient-specific PTV margins according to patient characteristics in the absence of daily image-guided treatment setup. BioMed Central 2021-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8336062/ /pubmed/34344403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01863-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Luo, Jurui
Yin, Zhihai
Zhang, Zhen
Guo, Xiaomao
Yu, Xiaoli
Wang, Juanqi
Does the protocol-required uniform margin around the CTV adequately account for setup inaccuracies in whole breast irradiation?
title Does the protocol-required uniform margin around the CTV adequately account for setup inaccuracies in whole breast irradiation?
title_full Does the protocol-required uniform margin around the CTV adequately account for setup inaccuracies in whole breast irradiation?
title_fullStr Does the protocol-required uniform margin around the CTV adequately account for setup inaccuracies in whole breast irradiation?
title_full_unstemmed Does the protocol-required uniform margin around the CTV adequately account for setup inaccuracies in whole breast irradiation?
title_short Does the protocol-required uniform margin around the CTV adequately account for setup inaccuracies in whole breast irradiation?
title_sort does the protocol-required uniform margin around the ctv adequately account for setup inaccuracies in whole breast irradiation?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8336062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34344403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01863-w
work_keys_str_mv AT luojurui doestheprotocolrequireduniformmarginaroundthectvadequatelyaccountforsetupinaccuraciesinwholebreastirradiation
AT yinzhihai doestheprotocolrequireduniformmarginaroundthectvadequatelyaccountforsetupinaccuraciesinwholebreastirradiation
AT zhangzhen doestheprotocolrequireduniformmarginaroundthectvadequatelyaccountforsetupinaccuraciesinwholebreastirradiation
AT guoxiaomao doestheprotocolrequireduniformmarginaroundthectvadequatelyaccountforsetupinaccuraciesinwholebreastirradiation
AT yuxiaoli doestheprotocolrequireduniformmarginaroundthectvadequatelyaccountforsetupinaccuraciesinwholebreastirradiation
AT wangjuanqi doestheprotocolrequireduniformmarginaroundthectvadequatelyaccountforsetupinaccuraciesinwholebreastirradiation