Cargando…
Acceptability of a digital return-to-work intervention for common mental disorders: a qualitative study on service user perspectives
BACKGROUND: There is an evident discrepancy between need and provision of evidence-based return-to-work (RTW) interventions in existing mental health services. Online dissemination of evidence-based interventions is presumed to reduce this gap. However, there is almost no knowledge available on perc...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8336332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34344327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03386-w |
_version_ | 1783733297641160704 |
---|---|
author | Engdahl, Patrik Svedberg, Petra Bejerholm, Ulrika |
author_facet | Engdahl, Patrik Svedberg, Petra Bejerholm, Ulrika |
author_sort | Engdahl, Patrik |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is an evident discrepancy between need and provision of evidence-based return-to-work (RTW) interventions in existing mental health services. Online dissemination of evidence-based interventions is presumed to reduce this gap. However, there is almost no knowledge available on perceived acceptability of digital RTW interventions among service users, which are factors that might influence the development and implementation of future interventions. The aim of this study was to develop knowledge of service user acceptability of mWorks, a proposed digital RTW solution. METHODS: Participants (n = 18) with experience of common mental disorder and sick leave were recruited with a purposive snowball sampling method. Semi-structured interviews (n = 12) and one focus group interview (n = 6) were conducted. A deductive thematic analysis was performed according to the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. RESULTS: Digital RTW interventions were perceived as acceptable and aligned with participant value. Participants expressed positive attitudes toward having access to support, regardless of time and place. A certain ambiguity between a decline in social interactions and opportunities to RTW in a safe space was reported. Participants were confident in their ability to use digital RTW solutions, but reported the need to reduce stressful elements of using smartphones. Overly demanding digital solutions, i.e. ones requiring high cognitive effort, were described as burdensome. CONCLUSIONS: For digital RTW solutions to be acceptable, they need to complement traditional services by providing accessible and person-centred support throughout the RTW process. They should be designed to reduce the need for cognitive effort. Future research should explore how to balance user autonomy with other support components in digital interventions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-021-03386-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8336332 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83363322021-08-04 Acceptability of a digital return-to-work intervention for common mental disorders: a qualitative study on service user perspectives Engdahl, Patrik Svedberg, Petra Bejerholm, Ulrika BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: There is an evident discrepancy between need and provision of evidence-based return-to-work (RTW) interventions in existing mental health services. Online dissemination of evidence-based interventions is presumed to reduce this gap. However, there is almost no knowledge available on perceived acceptability of digital RTW interventions among service users, which are factors that might influence the development and implementation of future interventions. The aim of this study was to develop knowledge of service user acceptability of mWorks, a proposed digital RTW solution. METHODS: Participants (n = 18) with experience of common mental disorder and sick leave were recruited with a purposive snowball sampling method. Semi-structured interviews (n = 12) and one focus group interview (n = 6) were conducted. A deductive thematic analysis was performed according to the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. RESULTS: Digital RTW interventions were perceived as acceptable and aligned with participant value. Participants expressed positive attitudes toward having access to support, regardless of time and place. A certain ambiguity between a decline in social interactions and opportunities to RTW in a safe space was reported. Participants were confident in their ability to use digital RTW solutions, but reported the need to reduce stressful elements of using smartphones. Overly demanding digital solutions, i.e. ones requiring high cognitive effort, were described as burdensome. CONCLUSIONS: For digital RTW solutions to be acceptable, they need to complement traditional services by providing accessible and person-centred support throughout the RTW process. They should be designed to reduce the need for cognitive effort. Future research should explore how to balance user autonomy with other support components in digital interventions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-021-03386-w. BioMed Central 2021-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8336332/ /pubmed/34344327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03386-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Engdahl, Patrik Svedberg, Petra Bejerholm, Ulrika Acceptability of a digital return-to-work intervention for common mental disorders: a qualitative study on service user perspectives |
title | Acceptability of a digital return-to-work intervention for common mental disorders: a qualitative study on service user perspectives |
title_full | Acceptability of a digital return-to-work intervention for common mental disorders: a qualitative study on service user perspectives |
title_fullStr | Acceptability of a digital return-to-work intervention for common mental disorders: a qualitative study on service user perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed | Acceptability of a digital return-to-work intervention for common mental disorders: a qualitative study on service user perspectives |
title_short | Acceptability of a digital return-to-work intervention for common mental disorders: a qualitative study on service user perspectives |
title_sort | acceptability of a digital return-to-work intervention for common mental disorders: a qualitative study on service user perspectives |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8336332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34344327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03386-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT engdahlpatrik acceptabilityofadigitalreturntoworkinterventionforcommonmentaldisordersaqualitativestudyonserviceuserperspectives AT svedbergpetra acceptabilityofadigitalreturntoworkinterventionforcommonmentaldisordersaqualitativestudyonserviceuserperspectives AT bejerholmulrika acceptabilityofadigitalreturntoworkinterventionforcommonmentaldisordersaqualitativestudyonserviceuserperspectives |