Cargando…
Does Case Management Provide Support for Staff Facing Frequent Users of Emergency Departments? A Comparative Mixed-Method Evaluation of ED Staff Perception
OBJECTIVE: Frequent users of emergency departments (FUED) account for a disproportionate number of emergency department (ED) visits and contribute to a wide range of challenges for ED staff. While several research has documented that case management (CM) tailored to FUED leads to a reduction in ED v...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8336392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34348645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00481-9 |
_version_ | 1783733310601560064 |
---|---|
author | von Allmen, Michael Grazioli, Véronique S. Kasztura, Miriam Chastonay, Oriane Moullin, Joanna C. Hugli, Olivier Daeppen, Jean-Bernard Bodenmann, Patrick |
author_facet | von Allmen, Michael Grazioli, Véronique S. Kasztura, Miriam Chastonay, Oriane Moullin, Joanna C. Hugli, Olivier Daeppen, Jean-Bernard Bodenmann, Patrick |
author_sort | von Allmen, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Frequent users of emergency departments (FUED) account for a disproportionate number of emergency department (ED) visits and contribute to a wide range of challenges for ED staff. While several research has documented that case management (CM) tailored to FUED leads to a reduction in ED visits and a better quality of life (QoL) among FUED, whether there is added value for ED staff remains to be explored. This study aimed to compare, among staff in two academic EDs in Switzerland (one with and one without CM), the FUED-related knowledge, perceptions of the extent of the FUED issue, FUED-related work challenges and FUEDs’ legitimacy to use ED. METHOD: Mixed methods were employed. First, ED physicians and nurses (N = 253) of the two EDs completed an online survey assessing their knowledge and perceptions of FUEDs. Results between healthcare providers working in an ED with CM to those working in an ED without CM were compared using independent two-sided T-tests. Next, a sample of participants (n = 16) took part in a qualitative assessment via one-to-one interviews (n = 6) or focus groups (n = 10). RESULTS: Both quantitative and qualitative results documented that the FUED-related knowledge, the extent FUED were perceived as an issue and perceived FUEDs’ legitimacy to use ED were not different between groups. The level of perceived FUED-related challenges was also similar between groups. Quantitative results showed that nurses with CM experienced more challenges related to FUED. Qualitative exploration revealed that lack of psychiatric staff within the emergency team and lack of communication between ED staff and CM team were some of the explanations behind these counterintuitive findings. CONCLUSION: Despite promising results on FUEDs’ QoL and frequency of ED visits, these preliminary findings suggest that CM may provide limited support to ED staff in its current form. Given the high burden of FUED-related challenges encountered by ED staff, improved communication and FUED-related knowledge transfer between ED staff and the CM team should be prioritized to increase the value of a FUED CM intervention for ED staff. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-021-00481-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8336392 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83363922021-08-04 Does Case Management Provide Support for Staff Facing Frequent Users of Emergency Departments? A Comparative Mixed-Method Evaluation of ED Staff Perception von Allmen, Michael Grazioli, Véronique S. Kasztura, Miriam Chastonay, Oriane Moullin, Joanna C. Hugli, Olivier Daeppen, Jean-Bernard Bodenmann, Patrick BMC Emerg Med Research OBJECTIVE: Frequent users of emergency departments (FUED) account for a disproportionate number of emergency department (ED) visits and contribute to a wide range of challenges for ED staff. While several research has documented that case management (CM) tailored to FUED leads to a reduction in ED visits and a better quality of life (QoL) among FUED, whether there is added value for ED staff remains to be explored. This study aimed to compare, among staff in two academic EDs in Switzerland (one with and one without CM), the FUED-related knowledge, perceptions of the extent of the FUED issue, FUED-related work challenges and FUEDs’ legitimacy to use ED. METHOD: Mixed methods were employed. First, ED physicians and nurses (N = 253) of the two EDs completed an online survey assessing their knowledge and perceptions of FUEDs. Results between healthcare providers working in an ED with CM to those working in an ED without CM were compared using independent two-sided T-tests. Next, a sample of participants (n = 16) took part in a qualitative assessment via one-to-one interviews (n = 6) or focus groups (n = 10). RESULTS: Both quantitative and qualitative results documented that the FUED-related knowledge, the extent FUED were perceived as an issue and perceived FUEDs’ legitimacy to use ED were not different between groups. The level of perceived FUED-related challenges was also similar between groups. Quantitative results showed that nurses with CM experienced more challenges related to FUED. Qualitative exploration revealed that lack of psychiatric staff within the emergency team and lack of communication between ED staff and CM team were some of the explanations behind these counterintuitive findings. CONCLUSION: Despite promising results on FUEDs’ QoL and frequency of ED visits, these preliminary findings suggest that CM may provide limited support to ED staff in its current form. Given the high burden of FUED-related challenges encountered by ED staff, improved communication and FUED-related knowledge transfer between ED staff and the CM team should be prioritized to increase the value of a FUED CM intervention for ED staff. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-021-00481-9. BioMed Central 2021-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8336392/ /pubmed/34348645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00481-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research von Allmen, Michael Grazioli, Véronique S. Kasztura, Miriam Chastonay, Oriane Moullin, Joanna C. Hugli, Olivier Daeppen, Jean-Bernard Bodenmann, Patrick Does Case Management Provide Support for Staff Facing Frequent Users of Emergency Departments? A Comparative Mixed-Method Evaluation of ED Staff Perception |
title | Does Case Management Provide Support for Staff Facing Frequent Users of Emergency Departments? A Comparative Mixed-Method Evaluation of ED Staff Perception |
title_full | Does Case Management Provide Support for Staff Facing Frequent Users of Emergency Departments? A Comparative Mixed-Method Evaluation of ED Staff Perception |
title_fullStr | Does Case Management Provide Support for Staff Facing Frequent Users of Emergency Departments? A Comparative Mixed-Method Evaluation of ED Staff Perception |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Case Management Provide Support for Staff Facing Frequent Users of Emergency Departments? A Comparative Mixed-Method Evaluation of ED Staff Perception |
title_short | Does Case Management Provide Support for Staff Facing Frequent Users of Emergency Departments? A Comparative Mixed-Method Evaluation of ED Staff Perception |
title_sort | does case management provide support for staff facing frequent users of emergency departments? a comparative mixed-method evaluation of ed staff perception |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8336392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34348645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00481-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vonallmenmichael doescasemanagementprovidesupportforstafffacingfrequentusersofemergencydepartmentsacomparativemixedmethodevaluationofedstaffperception AT grazioliveroniques doescasemanagementprovidesupportforstafffacingfrequentusersofemergencydepartmentsacomparativemixedmethodevaluationofedstaffperception AT kaszturamiriam doescasemanagementprovidesupportforstafffacingfrequentusersofemergencydepartmentsacomparativemixedmethodevaluationofedstaffperception AT chastonayoriane doescasemanagementprovidesupportforstafffacingfrequentusersofemergencydepartmentsacomparativemixedmethodevaluationofedstaffperception AT moullinjoannac doescasemanagementprovidesupportforstafffacingfrequentusersofemergencydepartmentsacomparativemixedmethodevaluationofedstaffperception AT hugliolivier doescasemanagementprovidesupportforstafffacingfrequentusersofemergencydepartmentsacomparativemixedmethodevaluationofedstaffperception AT daeppenjeanbernard doescasemanagementprovidesupportforstafffacingfrequentusersofemergencydepartmentsacomparativemixedmethodevaluationofedstaffperception AT bodenmannpatrick doescasemanagementprovidesupportforstafffacingfrequentusersofemergencydepartmentsacomparativemixedmethodevaluationofedstaffperception |