Cargando…

Dissociation between 2-[(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission computed tomography, ultrasound and clinical assessments in patients with non-severe rheumatoid arthritis, including remission

BACKGROUND: Inflammation of patients joints with severe disease activity of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has already been visualized and quantified by 2-[(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission computed tomography ([(18)F] FDG PET/CT), but little is known about the metabolic status and its rel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rinkin, Charline, Fosse, Pacôme, Malaise, Olivier, Chapelier, Nathalie, Horrion, Jil, Seidel, Laurence, Albert, Adelin, Hustinx, Roland, Malaise, Michel G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8336401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34344479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-021-00196-1
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Inflammation of patients joints with severe disease activity of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has already been visualized and quantified by 2-[(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission computed tomography ([(18)F] FDG PET/CT), but little is known about the metabolic status and its relationship with clinical and ultrasonography (US) metrology in patients with low/moderate activity or in remission. METHODS: Clinical assessments [based on 28-joint disease activity score (DAS(28)-CRP) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)], [(18)F] FDG PET/CT, US and X-ray were performed on 63 RA patients classified into remission or low/moderate or severe disease activity groups. PET/CT was visually and then semi-quantitatively analysed by determining the standardized uptake value (SUV) of positive joints. RESULTS: Of the 1764 joints, 21.1% were tender only, 13.7% swollen only, 27.6% tender or swollen, 7.3% tender and swollen, 20.5% PET/CT-positive and 8.6% US-positive. PET and US measurements were correlated, albeit with poor concordance. The positive predictive value of PET/CT for clinical evaluation (tender and/or swollen) was low, whereas its negative predictive value was high. Highly significant differences were found with the number of PET/CT-positive joints and with cumulative SUV between “severe” and “non-severe” patients (including those in remission and those with low/moderate activity) and not between those classified as “remission” and “non-remission” or “remission” and “low/moderate activity”. Moreover, the correlation between PET/CT measurements and clinical activity was positive only in the CDAI severe disease group. In patients in remission or with low/moderate activity, only 20–30% of joints were PET/CT-negative. In remission, PET/CT and US were positive in different joints, and PET/CT-positive but US-negative joints mainly exhibited RA (38.1%) or normal (49.2%) and not osteoarthritic (12.7%) X-ray patterns. CONCLUSIONS: [(18)F] FDG PET/CT was effective at distinguishing patients with severely active disease from other patients. In non-severe RA patients, including those in remission, PET/CT results are discordant from US and clinical observations. A longitudinal analysis is needed to explore the clinical relevance of such infra-clinical disease. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41927-021-00196-1.