Cargando…

Men’s sheds as community-based health promotion for men aged 50 plus: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review

BACKGROUND: Men are less likely to participate in health promotion. One approach to reach men is the concept of men’s sheds. This community-based health promotion concept brings older men together to engage in joint activities. Prior research revealed various health-related effects of men’s sheds, s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albrecht, Birte Marie, Foettinger, Linda, Bammann, Karin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8336413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34344476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01762-x
_version_ 1783733314896527360
author Albrecht, Birte Marie
Foettinger, Linda
Bammann, Karin
author_facet Albrecht, Birte Marie
Foettinger, Linda
Bammann, Karin
author_sort Albrecht, Birte Marie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Men are less likely to participate in health promotion. One approach to reach men is the concept of men’s sheds. This community-based health promotion concept brings older men together to engage in joint activities. Prior research revealed various health-related effects of men’s sheds, such as benefits for well-being and mental health. To strengthen the current evidence base of men’s sheds, a mixed-methods systematic review analysing the association between participation and self-rated health, subjective well-being, and social isolation will be conducted. Moreover, information on how to successfully implement men’s sheds will be gathered. METHODS: This mixed-methods systematic review will follow the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). The databases MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, and OpenGrey and the websites of men’s sheds associations will be searched for publications. Additionally, a hand search in the reference lists of the included publications will be conducted. Qualitative and quantitative studies published in English, German, or French will be considered for inclusion. The quality of the selected studies will be assessed using the JBI critical appraisal checklists. Following the convergent integrated approach, quantitative data will be transformed into textual descriptions, and subsequently combined with data from qualitative studies as well as from the qualitative components of mixed-methods studies in a simultaneous data synthesis. DISCUSSION: The results of this systematic review will lead to a comprehensive understanding of the current evidence base regarding the effectiveness of men’s sheds. Furthermore, they will provide useful implications for the implementation of men’s sheds. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020219390 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01762-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8336413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83364132021-08-04 Men’s sheds as community-based health promotion for men aged 50 plus: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review Albrecht, Birte Marie Foettinger, Linda Bammann, Karin Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Men are less likely to participate in health promotion. One approach to reach men is the concept of men’s sheds. This community-based health promotion concept brings older men together to engage in joint activities. Prior research revealed various health-related effects of men’s sheds, such as benefits for well-being and mental health. To strengthen the current evidence base of men’s sheds, a mixed-methods systematic review analysing the association between participation and self-rated health, subjective well-being, and social isolation will be conducted. Moreover, information on how to successfully implement men’s sheds will be gathered. METHODS: This mixed-methods systematic review will follow the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). The databases MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, and OpenGrey and the websites of men’s sheds associations will be searched for publications. Additionally, a hand search in the reference lists of the included publications will be conducted. Qualitative and quantitative studies published in English, German, or French will be considered for inclusion. The quality of the selected studies will be assessed using the JBI critical appraisal checklists. Following the convergent integrated approach, quantitative data will be transformed into textual descriptions, and subsequently combined with data from qualitative studies as well as from the qualitative components of mixed-methods studies in a simultaneous data synthesis. DISCUSSION: The results of this systematic review will lead to a comprehensive understanding of the current evidence base regarding the effectiveness of men’s sheds. Furthermore, they will provide useful implications for the implementation of men’s sheds. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020219390 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01762-x. BioMed Central 2021-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8336413/ /pubmed/34344476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01762-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Protocol
Albrecht, Birte Marie
Foettinger, Linda
Bammann, Karin
Men’s sheds as community-based health promotion for men aged 50 plus: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review
title Men’s sheds as community-based health promotion for men aged 50 plus: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review
title_full Men’s sheds as community-based health promotion for men aged 50 plus: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review
title_fullStr Men’s sheds as community-based health promotion for men aged 50 plus: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Men’s sheds as community-based health promotion for men aged 50 plus: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review
title_short Men’s sheds as community-based health promotion for men aged 50 plus: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review
title_sort men’s sheds as community-based health promotion for men aged 50 plus: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8336413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34344476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01762-x
work_keys_str_mv AT albrechtbirtemarie mensshedsascommunitybasedhealthpromotionformenaged50plusprotocolforamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT foettingerlinda mensshedsascommunitybasedhealthpromotionformenaged50plusprotocolforamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT bammannkarin mensshedsascommunitybasedhealthpromotionformenaged50plusprotocolforamixedmethodssystematicreview