Cargando…
Men’s sheds as community-based health promotion for men aged 50 plus: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review
BACKGROUND: Men are less likely to participate in health promotion. One approach to reach men is the concept of men’s sheds. This community-based health promotion concept brings older men together to engage in joint activities. Prior research revealed various health-related effects of men’s sheds, s...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8336413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34344476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01762-x |
_version_ | 1783733314896527360 |
---|---|
author | Albrecht, Birte Marie Foettinger, Linda Bammann, Karin |
author_facet | Albrecht, Birte Marie Foettinger, Linda Bammann, Karin |
author_sort | Albrecht, Birte Marie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Men are less likely to participate in health promotion. One approach to reach men is the concept of men’s sheds. This community-based health promotion concept brings older men together to engage in joint activities. Prior research revealed various health-related effects of men’s sheds, such as benefits for well-being and mental health. To strengthen the current evidence base of men’s sheds, a mixed-methods systematic review analysing the association between participation and self-rated health, subjective well-being, and social isolation will be conducted. Moreover, information on how to successfully implement men’s sheds will be gathered. METHODS: This mixed-methods systematic review will follow the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). The databases MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, and OpenGrey and the websites of men’s sheds associations will be searched for publications. Additionally, a hand search in the reference lists of the included publications will be conducted. Qualitative and quantitative studies published in English, German, or French will be considered for inclusion. The quality of the selected studies will be assessed using the JBI critical appraisal checklists. Following the convergent integrated approach, quantitative data will be transformed into textual descriptions, and subsequently combined with data from qualitative studies as well as from the qualitative components of mixed-methods studies in a simultaneous data synthesis. DISCUSSION: The results of this systematic review will lead to a comprehensive understanding of the current evidence base regarding the effectiveness of men’s sheds. Furthermore, they will provide useful implications for the implementation of men’s sheds. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020219390 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01762-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8336413 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83364132021-08-04 Men’s sheds as community-based health promotion for men aged 50 plus: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review Albrecht, Birte Marie Foettinger, Linda Bammann, Karin Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Men are less likely to participate in health promotion. One approach to reach men is the concept of men’s sheds. This community-based health promotion concept brings older men together to engage in joint activities. Prior research revealed various health-related effects of men’s sheds, such as benefits for well-being and mental health. To strengthen the current evidence base of men’s sheds, a mixed-methods systematic review analysing the association between participation and self-rated health, subjective well-being, and social isolation will be conducted. Moreover, information on how to successfully implement men’s sheds will be gathered. METHODS: This mixed-methods systematic review will follow the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). The databases MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, and OpenGrey and the websites of men’s sheds associations will be searched for publications. Additionally, a hand search in the reference lists of the included publications will be conducted. Qualitative and quantitative studies published in English, German, or French will be considered for inclusion. The quality of the selected studies will be assessed using the JBI critical appraisal checklists. Following the convergent integrated approach, quantitative data will be transformed into textual descriptions, and subsequently combined with data from qualitative studies as well as from the qualitative components of mixed-methods studies in a simultaneous data synthesis. DISCUSSION: The results of this systematic review will lead to a comprehensive understanding of the current evidence base regarding the effectiveness of men’s sheds. Furthermore, they will provide useful implications for the implementation of men’s sheds. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020219390 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01762-x. BioMed Central 2021-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8336413/ /pubmed/34344476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01762-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Albrecht, Birte Marie Foettinger, Linda Bammann, Karin Men’s sheds as community-based health promotion for men aged 50 plus: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review |
title | Men’s sheds as community-based health promotion for men aged 50 plus: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review |
title_full | Men’s sheds as community-based health promotion for men aged 50 plus: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review |
title_fullStr | Men’s sheds as community-based health promotion for men aged 50 plus: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Men’s sheds as community-based health promotion for men aged 50 plus: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review |
title_short | Men’s sheds as community-based health promotion for men aged 50 plus: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review |
title_sort | men’s sheds as community-based health promotion for men aged 50 plus: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8336413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34344476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01762-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT albrechtbirtemarie mensshedsascommunitybasedhealthpromotionformenaged50plusprotocolforamixedmethodssystematicreview AT foettingerlinda mensshedsascommunitybasedhealthpromotionformenaged50plusprotocolforamixedmethodssystematicreview AT bammannkarin mensshedsascommunitybasedhealthpromotionformenaged50plusprotocolforamixedmethodssystematicreview |