Cargando…

Outdoor Uphill Exercise Testing for Trail Runners, a More Suitable Method?

There is extensive knowledge about uphill running on a treadmill, although paucity regarding the influence of uphill trail running on exercise capacity in runners. The purpose of this study was to compare an uphill field test with a treadmill test with 1% inclination especially considering cardiopul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schöffl, Isabelle, Jasinski, Dominik, Ehrlich, Benedikt, Dittrich, Sven, Schöffl, Volker
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8336550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34400992
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2021-0066
_version_ 1783733343214370816
author Schöffl, Isabelle
Jasinski, Dominik
Ehrlich, Benedikt
Dittrich, Sven
Schöffl, Volker
author_facet Schöffl, Isabelle
Jasinski, Dominik
Ehrlich, Benedikt
Dittrich, Sven
Schöffl, Volker
author_sort Schöffl, Isabelle
collection PubMed
description There is extensive knowledge about uphill running on a treadmill, although paucity regarding the influence of uphill trail running on exercise capacity in runners. The purpose of this study was to compare an uphill field test with a treadmill test with 1% inclination especially considering cardiopulmonary exercise variables. The difference in those tests between a group of trail runners and a group of road runners was tested for establishing a test specifically for trail runners. Ten male endurance road runners and ten male trail runners performed one maximal incremental treadmill test with 1% inclination and a maximal incremental field test on a hill at 16% inclination which they were instructed to run up four times for three minutes, each time with a higher pace. A mobile cardiopulmonary exercise testing unit was used to measure ventilation. There were no significant differences between trail runners and road runners. The equivalence factor was comparable between both groups. [Image: see text] was comparable for both test protocols. However, there was a significant difference between the two test protocols regarding lactate concentration, the respiratory exchange ratio, running cost, heart rate, Breathing reserve, and O(2pulse). The greater lactate concentration and running cost recorded uphill indicate a higher energy demand during trail running than level road running.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8336550
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83365502021-08-15 Outdoor Uphill Exercise Testing for Trail Runners, a More Suitable Method? Schöffl, Isabelle Jasinski, Dominik Ehrlich, Benedikt Dittrich, Sven Schöffl, Volker J Hum Kinet Section II - Exercise Physiology & Sports Medicine There is extensive knowledge about uphill running on a treadmill, although paucity regarding the influence of uphill trail running on exercise capacity in runners. The purpose of this study was to compare an uphill field test with a treadmill test with 1% inclination especially considering cardiopulmonary exercise variables. The difference in those tests between a group of trail runners and a group of road runners was tested for establishing a test specifically for trail runners. Ten male endurance road runners and ten male trail runners performed one maximal incremental treadmill test with 1% inclination and a maximal incremental field test on a hill at 16% inclination which they were instructed to run up four times for three minutes, each time with a higher pace. A mobile cardiopulmonary exercise testing unit was used to measure ventilation. There were no significant differences between trail runners and road runners. The equivalence factor was comparable between both groups. [Image: see text] was comparable for both test protocols. However, there was a significant difference between the two test protocols regarding lactate concentration, the respiratory exchange ratio, running cost, heart rate, Breathing reserve, and O(2pulse). The greater lactate concentration and running cost recorded uphill indicate a higher energy demand during trail running than level road running. Sciendo 2021-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8336550/ /pubmed/34400992 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2021-0066 Text en © 2021 Isabelle Schöffl, Dominik Jasinski, Benedikt Ehrlich, Sven Dittrich, Volker Schöffl, published by Sciendo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Section II - Exercise Physiology & Sports Medicine
Schöffl, Isabelle
Jasinski, Dominik
Ehrlich, Benedikt
Dittrich, Sven
Schöffl, Volker
Outdoor Uphill Exercise Testing for Trail Runners, a More Suitable Method?
title Outdoor Uphill Exercise Testing for Trail Runners, a More Suitable Method?
title_full Outdoor Uphill Exercise Testing for Trail Runners, a More Suitable Method?
title_fullStr Outdoor Uphill Exercise Testing for Trail Runners, a More Suitable Method?
title_full_unstemmed Outdoor Uphill Exercise Testing for Trail Runners, a More Suitable Method?
title_short Outdoor Uphill Exercise Testing for Trail Runners, a More Suitable Method?
title_sort outdoor uphill exercise testing for trail runners, a more suitable method?
topic Section II - Exercise Physiology & Sports Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8336550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34400992
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2021-0066
work_keys_str_mv AT schofflisabelle outdooruphillexercisetestingfortrailrunnersamoresuitablemethod
AT jasinskidominik outdooruphillexercisetestingfortrailrunnersamoresuitablemethod
AT ehrlichbenedikt outdooruphillexercisetestingfortrailrunnersamoresuitablemethod
AT dittrichsven outdooruphillexercisetestingfortrailrunnersamoresuitablemethod
AT schofflvolker outdooruphillexercisetestingfortrailrunnersamoresuitablemethod