Cargando…

MBboard: Validity and Reliability of a New Tool Developed to Evaluate Specific Strength in Rock Climbers

In the present study, we analysed the validity and reliability of a new tool designed to assist the measurement of maximal upper-limb strength in rock climbers in a specific way, named MBboard. The MBboard consists of an artificial small climbing hold affixed to a wooden board, which is connected to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marino, Thomas K., Coelho, Daniel B., Lima-Silva, Adriano E., Bertuzzi, Romulo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8336553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34400982
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2021-0060
_version_ 1783733343908528128
author Marino, Thomas K.
Coelho, Daniel B.
Lima-Silva, Adriano E.
Bertuzzi, Romulo
author_facet Marino, Thomas K.
Coelho, Daniel B.
Lima-Silva, Adriano E.
Bertuzzi, Romulo
author_sort Marino, Thomas K.
collection PubMed
description In the present study, we analysed the validity and reliability of a new tool designed to assist the measurement of maximal upper-limb strength in rock climbers in a specific way, named MBboard. The MBboard consists of an artificial small climbing hold affixed to a wooden board, which is connected to any cable-motion strength equipment to determine the maximum dynamic strength (MBboard-1RM). Ten male rock climbers (Rock Climbing Group, RCG = 10) and ten physically active men (Control Group, CG = 10) performed, on three separate occasions, a familiarization session with procedures adopted during MBboard-1RM testing and two experimental trials (i.e., test and retest) to determine the construct validity and reliability of the MBboard during unilateral seated cable row exercise. In the first trial, the electromyographic activity (EMG) was recorded from the flexor digitorum superficialis. The self-reported climbing ability was also recorded. The RCG had superior performance (i.e. 37.5%) and EMG activity (i.e. 51%) in MBboard-1RM testing when compared with the CG (p < 0.05). There was a significant correlation between the MBboard-1RM results and climbing ability (r > 0.72, p < 0.05). Intraclass correlation coefficient analysis revealed good reliability within trials (ICC > 0.79, p < 0.05). These findings suggest that the MBboard is a valid and reliable tool to assess rock climbing-specific maximal strength. The validity of MBboard-1RM appears to be related to the finger flexor muscles activation, probably reflecting the specific adaptations resulting from long-term practice of this sport discipline.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8336553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83365532021-08-15 MBboard: Validity and Reliability of a New Tool Developed to Evaluate Specific Strength in Rock Climbers Marino, Thomas K. Coelho, Daniel B. Lima-Silva, Adriano E. Bertuzzi, Romulo J Hum Kinet Section I - Kinesiology In the present study, we analysed the validity and reliability of a new tool designed to assist the measurement of maximal upper-limb strength in rock climbers in a specific way, named MBboard. The MBboard consists of an artificial small climbing hold affixed to a wooden board, which is connected to any cable-motion strength equipment to determine the maximum dynamic strength (MBboard-1RM). Ten male rock climbers (Rock Climbing Group, RCG = 10) and ten physically active men (Control Group, CG = 10) performed, on three separate occasions, a familiarization session with procedures adopted during MBboard-1RM testing and two experimental trials (i.e., test and retest) to determine the construct validity and reliability of the MBboard during unilateral seated cable row exercise. In the first trial, the electromyographic activity (EMG) was recorded from the flexor digitorum superficialis. The self-reported climbing ability was also recorded. The RCG had superior performance (i.e. 37.5%) and EMG activity (i.e. 51%) in MBboard-1RM testing when compared with the CG (p < 0.05). There was a significant correlation between the MBboard-1RM results and climbing ability (r > 0.72, p < 0.05). Intraclass correlation coefficient analysis revealed good reliability within trials (ICC > 0.79, p < 0.05). These findings suggest that the MBboard is a valid and reliable tool to assess rock climbing-specific maximal strength. The validity of MBboard-1RM appears to be related to the finger flexor muscles activation, probably reflecting the specific adaptations resulting from long-term practice of this sport discipline. Sciendo 2021-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8336553/ /pubmed/34400982 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2021-0060 Text en © 2021 Thomas K. Marino, Daniel B. Coelho, Adriano E. Lima-Silva, Romulo Bertuzzi, published by Sciendo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Section I - Kinesiology
Marino, Thomas K.
Coelho, Daniel B.
Lima-Silva, Adriano E.
Bertuzzi, Romulo
MBboard: Validity and Reliability of a New Tool Developed to Evaluate Specific Strength in Rock Climbers
title MBboard: Validity and Reliability of a New Tool Developed to Evaluate Specific Strength in Rock Climbers
title_full MBboard: Validity and Reliability of a New Tool Developed to Evaluate Specific Strength in Rock Climbers
title_fullStr MBboard: Validity and Reliability of a New Tool Developed to Evaluate Specific Strength in Rock Climbers
title_full_unstemmed MBboard: Validity and Reliability of a New Tool Developed to Evaluate Specific Strength in Rock Climbers
title_short MBboard: Validity and Reliability of a New Tool Developed to Evaluate Specific Strength in Rock Climbers
title_sort mbboard: validity and reliability of a new tool developed to evaluate specific strength in rock climbers
topic Section I - Kinesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8336553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34400982
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2021-0060
work_keys_str_mv AT marinothomask mbboardvalidityandreliabilityofanewtooldevelopedtoevaluatespecificstrengthinrockclimbers
AT coelhodanielb mbboardvalidityandreliabilityofanewtooldevelopedtoevaluatespecificstrengthinrockclimbers
AT limasilvaadrianoe mbboardvalidityandreliabilityofanewtooldevelopedtoevaluatespecificstrengthinrockclimbers
AT bertuzziromulo mbboardvalidityandreliabilityofanewtooldevelopedtoevaluatespecificstrengthinrockclimbers