Cargando…

How democracies prevail: democratic resilience as a two-stage process

This article introduces a novel conceptualization of democratic resilience - a two-stage process where democracies avoid democratic declines altogether or avert democratic breakdown given that such autocratization is ongoing. Drawing on the Episodes of Regime Transformation (ERT) dataset, we find th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boese, Vanessa A., Edgell, Amanda B., Hellmeier, Sebastian, Maerz, Seraphine F., Lindberg, Staffan I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8336576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1891413
_version_ 1783733348085006336
author Boese, Vanessa A.
Edgell, Amanda B.
Hellmeier, Sebastian
Maerz, Seraphine F.
Lindberg, Staffan I.
author_facet Boese, Vanessa A.
Edgell, Amanda B.
Hellmeier, Sebastian
Maerz, Seraphine F.
Lindberg, Staffan I.
author_sort Boese, Vanessa A.
collection PubMed
description This article introduces a novel conceptualization of democratic resilience - a two-stage process where democracies avoid democratic declines altogether or avert democratic breakdown given that such autocratization is ongoing. Drawing on the Episodes of Regime Transformation (ERT) dataset, we find that democracies have had a high level of resilience to onset of autocratization since 1900. Nevertheless, democratic resilience has become substantially weaker since the end of the Cold War. Fifty-nine episodes of sustained and substantial declines in democratic practices have occurred since 1993, leading to the unprecedented breakdown of 36 democratic regimes. Ominously, we find that once autocratization begins, only one in five democracies manage to avert breakdown. We also analyse which factors are associated with each stage of democratic resilience. The results suggest that democracies are more resilient when strong judicial constraints on the executive are present and democratic institutions were strong in the past. Conversely and adding nuance to the literature, economic development is only associated with resilience to onset of autocratization, not to resilience against breakdown once autocratization has begun.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8336576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83365762021-08-13 How democracies prevail: democratic resilience as a two-stage process Boese, Vanessa A. Edgell, Amanda B. Hellmeier, Sebastian Maerz, Seraphine F. Lindberg, Staffan I. Democratization Research Articles This article introduces a novel conceptualization of democratic resilience - a two-stage process where democracies avoid democratic declines altogether or avert democratic breakdown given that such autocratization is ongoing. Drawing on the Episodes of Regime Transformation (ERT) dataset, we find that democracies have had a high level of resilience to onset of autocratization since 1900. Nevertheless, democratic resilience has become substantially weaker since the end of the Cold War. Fifty-nine episodes of sustained and substantial declines in democratic practices have occurred since 1993, leading to the unprecedented breakdown of 36 democratic regimes. Ominously, we find that once autocratization begins, only one in five democracies manage to avert breakdown. We also analyse which factors are associated with each stage of democratic resilience. The results suggest that democracies are more resilient when strong judicial constraints on the executive are present and democratic institutions were strong in the past. Conversely and adding nuance to the literature, economic development is only associated with resilience to onset of autocratization, not to resilience against breakdown once autocratization has begun. Routledge 2021-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8336576/ /pubmed/34393609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1891413 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Boese, Vanessa A.
Edgell, Amanda B.
Hellmeier, Sebastian
Maerz, Seraphine F.
Lindberg, Staffan I.
How democracies prevail: democratic resilience as a two-stage process
title How democracies prevail: democratic resilience as a two-stage process
title_full How democracies prevail: democratic resilience as a two-stage process
title_fullStr How democracies prevail: democratic resilience as a two-stage process
title_full_unstemmed How democracies prevail: democratic resilience as a two-stage process
title_short How democracies prevail: democratic resilience as a two-stage process
title_sort how democracies prevail: democratic resilience as a two-stage process
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8336576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1891413
work_keys_str_mv AT boesevanessaa howdemocraciesprevaildemocraticresilienceasatwostageprocess
AT edgellamandab howdemocraciesprevaildemocraticresilienceasatwostageprocess
AT hellmeiersebastian howdemocraciesprevaildemocraticresilienceasatwostageprocess
AT maerzseraphinef howdemocraciesprevaildemocraticresilienceasatwostageprocess
AT lindbergstaffani howdemocraciesprevaildemocraticresilienceasatwostageprocess