Cargando…
How democracies prevail: democratic resilience as a two-stage process
This article introduces a novel conceptualization of democratic resilience - a two-stage process where democracies avoid democratic declines altogether or avert democratic breakdown given that such autocratization is ongoing. Drawing on the Episodes of Regime Transformation (ERT) dataset, we find th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Routledge
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8336576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1891413 |
_version_ | 1783733348085006336 |
---|---|
author | Boese, Vanessa A. Edgell, Amanda B. Hellmeier, Sebastian Maerz, Seraphine F. Lindberg, Staffan I. |
author_facet | Boese, Vanessa A. Edgell, Amanda B. Hellmeier, Sebastian Maerz, Seraphine F. Lindberg, Staffan I. |
author_sort | Boese, Vanessa A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This article introduces a novel conceptualization of democratic resilience - a two-stage process where democracies avoid democratic declines altogether or avert democratic breakdown given that such autocratization is ongoing. Drawing on the Episodes of Regime Transformation (ERT) dataset, we find that democracies have had a high level of resilience to onset of autocratization since 1900. Nevertheless, democratic resilience has become substantially weaker since the end of the Cold War. Fifty-nine episodes of sustained and substantial declines in democratic practices have occurred since 1993, leading to the unprecedented breakdown of 36 democratic regimes. Ominously, we find that once autocratization begins, only one in five democracies manage to avert breakdown. We also analyse which factors are associated with each stage of democratic resilience. The results suggest that democracies are more resilient when strong judicial constraints on the executive are present and democratic institutions were strong in the past. Conversely and adding nuance to the literature, economic development is only associated with resilience to onset of autocratization, not to resilience against breakdown once autocratization has begun. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8336576 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83365762021-08-13 How democracies prevail: democratic resilience as a two-stage process Boese, Vanessa A. Edgell, Amanda B. Hellmeier, Sebastian Maerz, Seraphine F. Lindberg, Staffan I. Democratization Research Articles This article introduces a novel conceptualization of democratic resilience - a two-stage process where democracies avoid democratic declines altogether or avert democratic breakdown given that such autocratization is ongoing. Drawing on the Episodes of Regime Transformation (ERT) dataset, we find that democracies have had a high level of resilience to onset of autocratization since 1900. Nevertheless, democratic resilience has become substantially weaker since the end of the Cold War. Fifty-nine episodes of sustained and substantial declines in democratic practices have occurred since 1993, leading to the unprecedented breakdown of 36 democratic regimes. Ominously, we find that once autocratization begins, only one in five democracies manage to avert breakdown. We also analyse which factors are associated with each stage of democratic resilience. The results suggest that democracies are more resilient when strong judicial constraints on the executive are present and democratic institutions were strong in the past. Conversely and adding nuance to the literature, economic development is only associated with resilience to onset of autocratization, not to resilience against breakdown once autocratization has begun. Routledge 2021-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8336576/ /pubmed/34393609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1891413 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Boese, Vanessa A. Edgell, Amanda B. Hellmeier, Sebastian Maerz, Seraphine F. Lindberg, Staffan I. How democracies prevail: democratic resilience as a two-stage process |
title | How democracies prevail: democratic resilience as a two-stage process |
title_full | How democracies prevail: democratic resilience as a two-stage process |
title_fullStr | How democracies prevail: democratic resilience as a two-stage process |
title_full_unstemmed | How democracies prevail: democratic resilience as a two-stage process |
title_short | How democracies prevail: democratic resilience as a two-stage process |
title_sort | how democracies prevail: democratic resilience as a two-stage process |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8336576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1891413 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boesevanessaa howdemocraciesprevaildemocraticresilienceasatwostageprocess AT edgellamandab howdemocraciesprevaildemocraticresilienceasatwostageprocess AT hellmeiersebastian howdemocraciesprevaildemocraticresilienceasatwostageprocess AT maerzseraphinef howdemocraciesprevaildemocraticresilienceasatwostageprocess AT lindbergstaffani howdemocraciesprevaildemocraticresilienceasatwostageprocess |