Cargando…

Petrological and geochemical characterisation of the sarsen stones at Stonehenge

Little is known of the properties of the sarsen stones (or silcretes) that comprise the main architecture of Stonehenge. The only studies of rock struck from the monument date from the 19(th) century, while 20(th) century investigations have focussed on excavated debris without demonstrating a link...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nash, David J., Ciborowski, T. Jake R., Darvill, Timothy, Parker Pearson, Mike, Ullyott, J. Stewart, Damaschke, Magret, Evans, Jane A., Goderis, Steven, Greaney, Susan, Huggett, Jennifer M., Ixer, Robert A., Pirrie, Duncan, Power, Matthew R., Salge, Tobias, Wilkinson, Neil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8336861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34347802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254760
_version_ 1783733391335620608
author Nash, David J.
Ciborowski, T. Jake R.
Darvill, Timothy
Parker Pearson, Mike
Ullyott, J. Stewart
Damaschke, Magret
Evans, Jane A.
Goderis, Steven
Greaney, Susan
Huggett, Jennifer M.
Ixer, Robert A.
Pirrie, Duncan
Power, Matthew R.
Salge, Tobias
Wilkinson, Neil
author_facet Nash, David J.
Ciborowski, T. Jake R.
Darvill, Timothy
Parker Pearson, Mike
Ullyott, J. Stewart
Damaschke, Magret
Evans, Jane A.
Goderis, Steven
Greaney, Susan
Huggett, Jennifer M.
Ixer, Robert A.
Pirrie, Duncan
Power, Matthew R.
Salge, Tobias
Wilkinson, Neil
author_sort Nash, David J.
collection PubMed
description Little is known of the properties of the sarsen stones (or silcretes) that comprise the main architecture of Stonehenge. The only studies of rock struck from the monument date from the 19(th) century, while 20(th) century investigations have focussed on excavated debris without demonstrating a link to specific megaliths. Here, we present the first comprehensive analysis of sarsen samples taken directly from a Stonehenge megalith (Stone 58, in the centrally placed trilithon horseshoe). We apply state-of-the-art petrographic, mineralogical and geochemical techniques to two cores drilled from the stone during conservation work in 1958. Petrographic analyses demonstrate that Stone 58 is a highly indurated, grain-supported, structureless and texturally mature groundwater silcrete, comprising fine-to-medium grained quartz sand cemented by optically-continuous syntaxial quartz overgrowths. In addition to detrital quartz, trace quantities of silica-rich rock fragments, Fe-oxides/hydroxides and other minerals are present. Cathodoluminescence analyses show that the quartz cement developed as an initial <10 μm thick zone of non-luminescing quartz followed by ~16 separate quartz cement growth zones. Late-stage Fe-oxides/hydroxides and Ti-oxides line and/or infill some pores. Automated mineralogical analyses indicate that the sarsen preserves 7.2 to 9.2 area % porosity as a moderately-connected intergranular network. Geochemical data show that the sarsen is chemically pure, comprising 99.7 wt. % SiO(2). The major and trace element chemistry is highly consistent within the stone, with the only magnitude variations being observed in Fe content. Non-quartz accessory minerals within the silcrete host sediments impart a trace element signature distinct from standard sedimentary and other crustal materials. (143)Nd/(144)Nd isotope analyses suggest that these host sediments were likely derived from eroded Mesozoic rocks, and that these Mesozoic rocks incorporated much older Mesoproterozoic material. The chemistry of Stone 58 has been identified recently as representative of 50 of the 52 remaining sarsens at Stonehenge. These results are therefore representative of the main stone type used to build what is arguably the most important Late Neolithic monument in Europe.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8336861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83368612021-08-05 Petrological and geochemical characterisation of the sarsen stones at Stonehenge Nash, David J. Ciborowski, T. Jake R. Darvill, Timothy Parker Pearson, Mike Ullyott, J. Stewart Damaschke, Magret Evans, Jane A. Goderis, Steven Greaney, Susan Huggett, Jennifer M. Ixer, Robert A. Pirrie, Duncan Power, Matthew R. Salge, Tobias Wilkinson, Neil PLoS One Research Article Little is known of the properties of the sarsen stones (or silcretes) that comprise the main architecture of Stonehenge. The only studies of rock struck from the monument date from the 19(th) century, while 20(th) century investigations have focussed on excavated debris without demonstrating a link to specific megaliths. Here, we present the first comprehensive analysis of sarsen samples taken directly from a Stonehenge megalith (Stone 58, in the centrally placed trilithon horseshoe). We apply state-of-the-art petrographic, mineralogical and geochemical techniques to two cores drilled from the stone during conservation work in 1958. Petrographic analyses demonstrate that Stone 58 is a highly indurated, grain-supported, structureless and texturally mature groundwater silcrete, comprising fine-to-medium grained quartz sand cemented by optically-continuous syntaxial quartz overgrowths. In addition to detrital quartz, trace quantities of silica-rich rock fragments, Fe-oxides/hydroxides and other minerals are present. Cathodoluminescence analyses show that the quartz cement developed as an initial <10 μm thick zone of non-luminescing quartz followed by ~16 separate quartz cement growth zones. Late-stage Fe-oxides/hydroxides and Ti-oxides line and/or infill some pores. Automated mineralogical analyses indicate that the sarsen preserves 7.2 to 9.2 area % porosity as a moderately-connected intergranular network. Geochemical data show that the sarsen is chemically pure, comprising 99.7 wt. % SiO(2). The major and trace element chemistry is highly consistent within the stone, with the only magnitude variations being observed in Fe content. Non-quartz accessory minerals within the silcrete host sediments impart a trace element signature distinct from standard sedimentary and other crustal materials. (143)Nd/(144)Nd isotope analyses suggest that these host sediments were likely derived from eroded Mesozoic rocks, and that these Mesozoic rocks incorporated much older Mesoproterozoic material. The chemistry of Stone 58 has been identified recently as representative of 50 of the 52 remaining sarsens at Stonehenge. These results are therefore representative of the main stone type used to build what is arguably the most important Late Neolithic monument in Europe. Public Library of Science 2021-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8336861/ /pubmed/34347802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254760 Text en © 2021 Nash et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nash, David J.
Ciborowski, T. Jake R.
Darvill, Timothy
Parker Pearson, Mike
Ullyott, J. Stewart
Damaschke, Magret
Evans, Jane A.
Goderis, Steven
Greaney, Susan
Huggett, Jennifer M.
Ixer, Robert A.
Pirrie, Duncan
Power, Matthew R.
Salge, Tobias
Wilkinson, Neil
Petrological and geochemical characterisation of the sarsen stones at Stonehenge
title Petrological and geochemical characterisation of the sarsen stones at Stonehenge
title_full Petrological and geochemical characterisation of the sarsen stones at Stonehenge
title_fullStr Petrological and geochemical characterisation of the sarsen stones at Stonehenge
title_full_unstemmed Petrological and geochemical characterisation of the sarsen stones at Stonehenge
title_short Petrological and geochemical characterisation of the sarsen stones at Stonehenge
title_sort petrological and geochemical characterisation of the sarsen stones at stonehenge
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8336861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34347802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254760
work_keys_str_mv AT nashdavidj petrologicalandgeochemicalcharacterisationofthesarsenstonesatstonehenge
AT ciborowskitjaker petrologicalandgeochemicalcharacterisationofthesarsenstonesatstonehenge
AT darvilltimothy petrologicalandgeochemicalcharacterisationofthesarsenstonesatstonehenge
AT parkerpearsonmike petrologicalandgeochemicalcharacterisationofthesarsenstonesatstonehenge
AT ullyottjstewart petrologicalandgeochemicalcharacterisationofthesarsenstonesatstonehenge
AT damaschkemagret petrologicalandgeochemicalcharacterisationofthesarsenstonesatstonehenge
AT evansjanea petrologicalandgeochemicalcharacterisationofthesarsenstonesatstonehenge
AT goderissteven petrologicalandgeochemicalcharacterisationofthesarsenstonesatstonehenge
AT greaneysusan petrologicalandgeochemicalcharacterisationofthesarsenstonesatstonehenge
AT huggettjenniferm petrologicalandgeochemicalcharacterisationofthesarsenstonesatstonehenge
AT ixerroberta petrologicalandgeochemicalcharacterisationofthesarsenstonesatstonehenge
AT pirrieduncan petrologicalandgeochemicalcharacterisationofthesarsenstonesatstonehenge
AT powermatthewr petrologicalandgeochemicalcharacterisationofthesarsenstonesatstonehenge
AT salgetobias petrologicalandgeochemicalcharacterisationofthesarsenstonesatstonehenge
AT wilkinsonneil petrologicalandgeochemicalcharacterisationofthesarsenstonesatstonehenge