Cargando…

Temporal integration of monaural and dichotic frequency modulation

Frequency modulation (FM) detection at low modulation frequencies is commonly used as an index of temporal fine-structure processing. The present study evaluated the rate of improvement in monaural and dichotic FM across a range of test parameters. In experiment I, dichotic and monaural FM detection...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palandrani, Katherine N., Hoover, Eric C., Stavropoulos, Trevor, Seitz, Aaron R., Isarangura, Sittiprapa, Gallun, Frederick J., Eddins, David A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Acoustical Society of America 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8337085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34470296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/10.0005729
_version_ 1783733438867570688
author Palandrani, Katherine N.
Hoover, Eric C.
Stavropoulos, Trevor
Seitz, Aaron R.
Isarangura, Sittiprapa
Gallun, Frederick J.
Eddins, David A.
author_facet Palandrani, Katherine N.
Hoover, Eric C.
Stavropoulos, Trevor
Seitz, Aaron R.
Isarangura, Sittiprapa
Gallun, Frederick J.
Eddins, David A.
author_sort Palandrani, Katherine N.
collection PubMed
description Frequency modulation (FM) detection at low modulation frequencies is commonly used as an index of temporal fine-structure processing. The present study evaluated the rate of improvement in monaural and dichotic FM across a range of test parameters. In experiment I, dichotic and monaural FM detection was measured as a function of duration and modulator starting phase. Dichotic FM thresholds were lower than monaural FM thresholds and the modulator starting phase had no effect on detection. Experiment II measured monaural FM detection for signals that differed in modulation rate and duration such that the improvement with duration in seconds (carrier) or cycles (modulator) was compared. Monaural FM detection improved monotonically with the number of modulation cycles, suggesting that the modulator is extracted prior to detection. Experiment III measured dichotic FM detection for shorter signal durations to test the hypothesis that dichotic FM relies primarily on the signal onset. The rate of improvement decreased as duration increased, which is consistent with the use of primarily onset cues for the detection of dichotic FM. These results establish that improvement with duration occurs as a function of the modulation cycles at a rate consistent with the independent-samples model for monaural FM, but later cycles contribute less to detection in dichotic FM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8337085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Acoustical Society of America
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83370852021-08-05 Temporal integration of monaural and dichotic frequency modulation Palandrani, Katherine N. Hoover, Eric C. Stavropoulos, Trevor Seitz, Aaron R. Isarangura, Sittiprapa Gallun, Frederick J. Eddins, David A. J Acoust Soc Am Psychological and Physiological Acoustics Frequency modulation (FM) detection at low modulation frequencies is commonly used as an index of temporal fine-structure processing. The present study evaluated the rate of improvement in monaural and dichotic FM across a range of test parameters. In experiment I, dichotic and monaural FM detection was measured as a function of duration and modulator starting phase. Dichotic FM thresholds were lower than monaural FM thresholds and the modulator starting phase had no effect on detection. Experiment II measured monaural FM detection for signals that differed in modulation rate and duration such that the improvement with duration in seconds (carrier) or cycles (modulator) was compared. Monaural FM detection improved monotonically with the number of modulation cycles, suggesting that the modulator is extracted prior to detection. Experiment III measured dichotic FM detection for shorter signal durations to test the hypothesis that dichotic FM relies primarily on the signal onset. The rate of improvement decreased as duration increased, which is consistent with the use of primarily onset cues for the detection of dichotic FM. These results establish that improvement with duration occurs as a function of the modulation cycles at a rate consistent with the independent-samples model for monaural FM, but later cycles contribute less to detection in dichotic FM. Acoustical Society of America 2021-08 2021-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8337085/ /pubmed/34470296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/10.0005729 Text en © 2021 Author(s). 0001-4966/2021/150(2)/745/14 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Psychological and Physiological Acoustics
Palandrani, Katherine N.
Hoover, Eric C.
Stavropoulos, Trevor
Seitz, Aaron R.
Isarangura, Sittiprapa
Gallun, Frederick J.
Eddins, David A.
Temporal integration of monaural and dichotic frequency modulation
title Temporal integration of monaural and dichotic frequency modulation
title_full Temporal integration of monaural and dichotic frequency modulation
title_fullStr Temporal integration of monaural and dichotic frequency modulation
title_full_unstemmed Temporal integration of monaural and dichotic frequency modulation
title_short Temporal integration of monaural and dichotic frequency modulation
title_sort temporal integration of monaural and dichotic frequency modulation
topic Psychological and Physiological Acoustics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8337085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34470296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/10.0005729
work_keys_str_mv AT palandranikatherinen temporalintegrationofmonauralanddichoticfrequencymodulation
AT hooverericc temporalintegrationofmonauralanddichoticfrequencymodulation
AT stavropoulostrevor temporalintegrationofmonauralanddichoticfrequencymodulation
AT seitzaaronr temporalintegrationofmonauralanddichoticfrequencymodulation
AT isarangurasittiprapa temporalintegrationofmonauralanddichoticfrequencymodulation
AT gallunfrederickj temporalintegrationofmonauralanddichoticfrequencymodulation
AT eddinsdavida temporalintegrationofmonauralanddichoticfrequencymodulation