Cargando…
Cranial bone flap resorption—pathological features and their implications for clinical treatment
Cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy (DC) has a primary complication when using the autologous bone: aseptic bone resorption (ABR). So far, risk factors such as age, number of fragments, and hydrocephalus have been identified but a thorough understanding of the underlying pathophysiology...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8338853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33047218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01417-w |
_version_ | 1783733478361137152 |
---|---|
author | Göttsche, Jennifer Mende, Klaus C. Schram, Anastasia Westphal, Manfred Amling, Michael Regelsberger, Jan Sauvigny, Thomas Hahn, Michael |
author_facet | Göttsche, Jennifer Mende, Klaus C. Schram, Anastasia Westphal, Manfred Amling, Michael Regelsberger, Jan Sauvigny, Thomas Hahn, Michael |
author_sort | Göttsche, Jennifer |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy (DC) has a primary complication when using the autologous bone: aseptic bone resorption (ABR). So far, risk factors such as age, number of fragments, and hydrocephalus have been identified but a thorough understanding of the underlying pathophysiology is still missing. The aim of this osteopathological investigation was to gain a better understanding of the underlying processes. Clinical data of patients who underwent surgical revision due to ABR was collected. Demographics, the time interval between craniectomy and cranioplasty, and endocrine serum parameters affecting bone metabolism were collected. Removed specimens underwent qualitative and quantitative histological examination. Two grafts without ABR were examined as controls. Compared to the controls, the typical layering of the cortical and cancellous bone was largely eliminated in the grafts. Histological investigations revealed the coexistence of osteolytic and osteoblastic activity within the necrosis. Bone appositions were distributed over the entire graft area. Remaining marrow spaces were predominantly fibrotic or necrotic. In areas with marrow cavity fibrosis, hardly any new bone tissue was found in the adjacent bone, while there were increased signs of osteoclastic resorption. Insufficient reintegration of the flap may be due to residual fatty bone marrow contained in the bone flap which seems to act as a barrier for osteogenesis. This may obstruct the reorganization of the bone structure, inducing aseptic bone necrosis. Following a path already taken in orthopedic surgery, thorough lavage of the implant to remove the bone marrow may be a possibility, but will need further investigation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8338853 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83388532021-08-20 Cranial bone flap resorption—pathological features and their implications for clinical treatment Göttsche, Jennifer Mende, Klaus C. Schram, Anastasia Westphal, Manfred Amling, Michael Regelsberger, Jan Sauvigny, Thomas Hahn, Michael Neurosurg Rev Original Article Cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy (DC) has a primary complication when using the autologous bone: aseptic bone resorption (ABR). So far, risk factors such as age, number of fragments, and hydrocephalus have been identified but a thorough understanding of the underlying pathophysiology is still missing. The aim of this osteopathological investigation was to gain a better understanding of the underlying processes. Clinical data of patients who underwent surgical revision due to ABR was collected. Demographics, the time interval between craniectomy and cranioplasty, and endocrine serum parameters affecting bone metabolism were collected. Removed specimens underwent qualitative and quantitative histological examination. Two grafts without ABR were examined as controls. Compared to the controls, the typical layering of the cortical and cancellous bone was largely eliminated in the grafts. Histological investigations revealed the coexistence of osteolytic and osteoblastic activity within the necrosis. Bone appositions were distributed over the entire graft area. Remaining marrow spaces were predominantly fibrotic or necrotic. In areas with marrow cavity fibrosis, hardly any new bone tissue was found in the adjacent bone, while there were increased signs of osteoclastic resorption. Insufficient reintegration of the flap may be due to residual fatty bone marrow contained in the bone flap which seems to act as a barrier for osteogenesis. This may obstruct the reorganization of the bone structure, inducing aseptic bone necrosis. Following a path already taken in orthopedic surgery, thorough lavage of the implant to remove the bone marrow may be a possibility, but will need further investigation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-10-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8338853/ /pubmed/33047218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01417-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Göttsche, Jennifer Mende, Klaus C. Schram, Anastasia Westphal, Manfred Amling, Michael Regelsberger, Jan Sauvigny, Thomas Hahn, Michael Cranial bone flap resorption—pathological features and their implications for clinical treatment |
title | Cranial bone flap resorption—pathological features and their implications for clinical treatment |
title_full | Cranial bone flap resorption—pathological features and their implications for clinical treatment |
title_fullStr | Cranial bone flap resorption—pathological features and their implications for clinical treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Cranial bone flap resorption—pathological features and their implications for clinical treatment |
title_short | Cranial bone flap resorption—pathological features and their implications for clinical treatment |
title_sort | cranial bone flap resorption—pathological features and their implications for clinical treatment |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8338853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33047218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01417-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gottschejennifer cranialboneflapresorptionpathologicalfeaturesandtheirimplicationsforclinicaltreatment AT mendeklausc cranialboneflapresorptionpathologicalfeaturesandtheirimplicationsforclinicaltreatment AT schramanastasia cranialboneflapresorptionpathologicalfeaturesandtheirimplicationsforclinicaltreatment AT westphalmanfred cranialboneflapresorptionpathologicalfeaturesandtheirimplicationsforclinicaltreatment AT amlingmichael cranialboneflapresorptionpathologicalfeaturesandtheirimplicationsforclinicaltreatment AT regelsbergerjan cranialboneflapresorptionpathologicalfeaturesandtheirimplicationsforclinicaltreatment AT sauvignythomas cranialboneflapresorptionpathologicalfeaturesandtheirimplicationsforclinicaltreatment AT hahnmichael cranialboneflapresorptionpathologicalfeaturesandtheirimplicationsforclinicaltreatment |