Cargando…

Analysis of the determining factors of detectable P‐wave and amplitude of QRS complex sensed by implantable loop recorder

BACKGROUND: Determining factors for sufficient QRS amplitude and discernible P‐wave sensing in implantable loop recorder (ILR) are unknown. We aimed to investigate determining factors and ILR implantation angle that may improve QRS complex and P‐wave sensing in ILR. METHODS: We retrospectively revie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahn, Jang Ho, Ryu, Hyunho, Oh, Il‐Young, Cho, Youngjin, Lee, Ji Hyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8339105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34386134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12582
_version_ 1783733526118531072
author Ahn, Jang Ho
Ryu, Hyunho
Oh, Il‐Young
Cho, Youngjin
Lee, Ji Hyun
author_facet Ahn, Jang Ho
Ryu, Hyunho
Oh, Il‐Young
Cho, Youngjin
Lee, Ji Hyun
author_sort Ahn, Jang Ho
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Determining factors for sufficient QRS amplitude and discernible P‐wave sensing in implantable loop recorder (ILR) are unknown. We aimed to investigate determining factors and ILR implantation angle that may improve QRS complex and P‐wave sensing in ILR. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 220 patients who underwent ILR implantation or follow‐up analysis. Patient demographic, clinical, echocardiography, electrocardiography, heart angle, and ILR angle data were collected as predictor variables. Associations between ILR QRS amplitude/P‐wave detectability and each predictor variable were investigated. RESULTS: Univariate linear regression showed that ILR QRS amplitude was significantly associated with age, height, ILR angle, and QRS amplitudes of 12‐lead electrocardiogram (ECG) (lead I, II, aVR [inverted aVR], aVF, V1–V6) and Holter ECG (lead V3, V5). Among discrete variables, only left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) affected ILR QRS amplitude (P = .016). A multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that ILR angle (β = −0.008, P < .001), lead aVR amplitude (β = 0.469, P = .003), Holter lead V5 amplitude (β = 0.116, P = .049), Age (β = −0.005, P = .014), and LVH (β = 0.213, P = .031) were independent determinants of ILR QRS amplitude. Logistic regression revealed that heart angle significantly affected ILR P‐wave detectability (β = 0.12, P = .008). Multiple logistic regression revealed that heart angle (β = 0.121, P = .013) and lead V1 amplitude (β = 28.1, P = .034) were independent determinants of ILR P‐wave detectability. CONCLUSION: ILR insertion angle, lead aVR QRS amplitude, Holter lead V5 QRS amplitude, age, and LVH are determinants of ILR QRS amplitude. Heart angle and lead V1 P‐wave amplitude of 12‐lead ECG are determinants of ILR P‐wave detectability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8339105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83391052021-08-11 Analysis of the determining factors of detectable P‐wave and amplitude of QRS complex sensed by implantable loop recorder Ahn, Jang Ho Ryu, Hyunho Oh, Il‐Young Cho, Youngjin Lee, Ji Hyun J Arrhythm Original Articles BACKGROUND: Determining factors for sufficient QRS amplitude and discernible P‐wave sensing in implantable loop recorder (ILR) are unknown. We aimed to investigate determining factors and ILR implantation angle that may improve QRS complex and P‐wave sensing in ILR. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 220 patients who underwent ILR implantation or follow‐up analysis. Patient demographic, clinical, echocardiography, electrocardiography, heart angle, and ILR angle data were collected as predictor variables. Associations between ILR QRS amplitude/P‐wave detectability and each predictor variable were investigated. RESULTS: Univariate linear regression showed that ILR QRS amplitude was significantly associated with age, height, ILR angle, and QRS amplitudes of 12‐lead electrocardiogram (ECG) (lead I, II, aVR [inverted aVR], aVF, V1–V6) and Holter ECG (lead V3, V5). Among discrete variables, only left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) affected ILR QRS amplitude (P = .016). A multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that ILR angle (β = −0.008, P < .001), lead aVR amplitude (β = 0.469, P = .003), Holter lead V5 amplitude (β = 0.116, P = .049), Age (β = −0.005, P = .014), and LVH (β = 0.213, P = .031) were independent determinants of ILR QRS amplitude. Logistic regression revealed that heart angle significantly affected ILR P‐wave detectability (β = 0.12, P = .008). Multiple logistic regression revealed that heart angle (β = 0.121, P = .013) and lead V1 amplitude (β = 28.1, P = .034) were independent determinants of ILR P‐wave detectability. CONCLUSION: ILR insertion angle, lead aVR QRS amplitude, Holter lead V5 QRS amplitude, age, and LVH are determinants of ILR QRS amplitude. Heart angle and lead V1 P‐wave amplitude of 12‐lead ECG are determinants of ILR P‐wave detectability. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8339105/ /pubmed/34386134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12582 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Heart Rhythm Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ahn, Jang Ho
Ryu, Hyunho
Oh, Il‐Young
Cho, Youngjin
Lee, Ji Hyun
Analysis of the determining factors of detectable P‐wave and amplitude of QRS complex sensed by implantable loop recorder
title Analysis of the determining factors of detectable P‐wave and amplitude of QRS complex sensed by implantable loop recorder
title_full Analysis of the determining factors of detectable P‐wave and amplitude of QRS complex sensed by implantable loop recorder
title_fullStr Analysis of the determining factors of detectable P‐wave and amplitude of QRS complex sensed by implantable loop recorder
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the determining factors of detectable P‐wave and amplitude of QRS complex sensed by implantable loop recorder
title_short Analysis of the determining factors of detectable P‐wave and amplitude of QRS complex sensed by implantable loop recorder
title_sort analysis of the determining factors of detectable p‐wave and amplitude of qrs complex sensed by implantable loop recorder
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8339105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34386134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12582
work_keys_str_mv AT ahnjangho analysisofthedeterminingfactorsofdetectablepwaveandamplitudeofqrscomplexsensedbyimplantablelooprecorder
AT ryuhyunho analysisofthedeterminingfactorsofdetectablepwaveandamplitudeofqrscomplexsensedbyimplantablelooprecorder
AT ohilyoung analysisofthedeterminingfactorsofdetectablepwaveandamplitudeofqrscomplexsensedbyimplantablelooprecorder
AT choyoungjin analysisofthedeterminingfactorsofdetectablepwaveandamplitudeofqrscomplexsensedbyimplantablelooprecorder
AT leejihyun analysisofthedeterminingfactorsofdetectablepwaveandamplitudeofqrscomplexsensedbyimplantablelooprecorder