Cargando…

In vitro studies evaluating the efficacy of mouth rinses on Sars-Cov-2: A systematic review

This systematic review aims to evaluate the evidence on the efficacy of mouth rinses on SARS-CoV-2 from in vitro studies. Five electronic databases were searched up to February 2021; no language or time restrictions were used. Two independent reviewers conducted both selection and data extraction pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tadakamadla, Jyothi, Boccalari, Elisa, Rathore, Vatsna, Dolci, Carolina, Tartaglia, Gianluca M., Tadakamadla, Santosh Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8339500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34399189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2021.07.020
_version_ 1783733613947256832
author Tadakamadla, Jyothi
Boccalari, Elisa
Rathore, Vatsna
Dolci, Carolina
Tartaglia, Gianluca M.
Tadakamadla, Santosh Kumar
author_facet Tadakamadla, Jyothi
Boccalari, Elisa
Rathore, Vatsna
Dolci, Carolina
Tartaglia, Gianluca M.
Tadakamadla, Santosh Kumar
author_sort Tadakamadla, Jyothi
collection PubMed
description This systematic review aims to evaluate the evidence on the efficacy of mouth rinses on SARS-CoV-2 from in vitro studies. Five electronic databases were searched up to February 2021; no language or time restrictions were used. Two independent reviewers conducted both selection and data extraction processes. The toxicological data reliability assessment tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias. Starting from 239 articles, retrieved by the electronic search, only eight studies were included in our systematic review. Povidone Iodine (PVP-I) was effective in killing SARS-CoV-2, demonstrated higher virucidal activity than other commonly used active ingredients. Conflicting results were found about the effectiveness of Chlorhexidine (CHX) while hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) proved less effective than PVP-I. Other active ingredients, such as quaternary ammonium compounds and Ethanol (particularly when combined with essential oils), have also shown promising results in reducing viral load, with results comparable to PVP-I.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8339500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83395002021-08-06 In vitro studies evaluating the efficacy of mouth rinses on Sars-Cov-2: A systematic review Tadakamadla, Jyothi Boccalari, Elisa Rathore, Vatsna Dolci, Carolina Tartaglia, Gianluca M. Tadakamadla, Santosh Kumar J Infect Public Health Review This systematic review aims to evaluate the evidence on the efficacy of mouth rinses on SARS-CoV-2 from in vitro studies. Five electronic databases were searched up to February 2021; no language or time restrictions were used. Two independent reviewers conducted both selection and data extraction processes. The toxicological data reliability assessment tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias. Starting from 239 articles, retrieved by the electronic search, only eight studies were included in our systematic review. Povidone Iodine (PVP-I) was effective in killing SARS-CoV-2, demonstrated higher virucidal activity than other commonly used active ingredients. Conflicting results were found about the effectiveness of Chlorhexidine (CHX) while hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) proved less effective than PVP-I. Other active ingredients, such as quaternary ammonium compounds and Ethanol (particularly when combined with essential oils), have also shown promising results in reducing viral load, with results comparable to PVP-I. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences. 2021-09 2021-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8339500/ /pubmed/34399189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2021.07.020 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Review
Tadakamadla, Jyothi
Boccalari, Elisa
Rathore, Vatsna
Dolci, Carolina
Tartaglia, Gianluca M.
Tadakamadla, Santosh Kumar
In vitro studies evaluating the efficacy of mouth rinses on Sars-Cov-2: A systematic review
title In vitro studies evaluating the efficacy of mouth rinses on Sars-Cov-2: A systematic review
title_full In vitro studies evaluating the efficacy of mouth rinses on Sars-Cov-2: A systematic review
title_fullStr In vitro studies evaluating the efficacy of mouth rinses on Sars-Cov-2: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed In vitro studies evaluating the efficacy of mouth rinses on Sars-Cov-2: A systematic review
title_short In vitro studies evaluating the efficacy of mouth rinses on Sars-Cov-2: A systematic review
title_sort in vitro studies evaluating the efficacy of mouth rinses on sars-cov-2: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8339500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34399189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2021.07.020
work_keys_str_mv AT tadakamadlajyothi invitrostudiesevaluatingtheefficacyofmouthrinsesonsarscov2asystematicreview
AT boccalarielisa invitrostudiesevaluatingtheefficacyofmouthrinsesonsarscov2asystematicreview
AT rathorevatsna invitrostudiesevaluatingtheefficacyofmouthrinsesonsarscov2asystematicreview
AT dolcicarolina invitrostudiesevaluatingtheefficacyofmouthrinsesonsarscov2asystematicreview
AT tartagliagianlucam invitrostudiesevaluatingtheefficacyofmouthrinsesonsarscov2asystematicreview
AT tadakamadlasantoshkumar invitrostudiesevaluatingtheefficacyofmouthrinsesonsarscov2asystematicreview