Cargando…

Feasibility of a home-based interdisciplinary rehabilitation program for patients with Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: the REACH study

BACKGROUND: Survivors of critical illness experience long-term functional challenges, which are complex, heterogeneous, and multifactorial in nature. Although the importance of rehabilitation interventions after intensive care unit (ICU) discharge is universally recognized, evidence on feasibility a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Major, Mel E., Dettling-Ihnenfeldt, Daniela, Ramaekers, Stephan P. J., Engelbert, Raoul H. H., van der Schaaf, Marike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8339801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34353341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03709-z
_version_ 1783733669201969152
author Major, Mel E.
Dettling-Ihnenfeldt, Daniela
Ramaekers, Stephan P. J.
Engelbert, Raoul H. H.
van der Schaaf, Marike
author_facet Major, Mel E.
Dettling-Ihnenfeldt, Daniela
Ramaekers, Stephan P. J.
Engelbert, Raoul H. H.
van der Schaaf, Marike
author_sort Major, Mel E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Survivors of critical illness experience long-term functional challenges, which are complex, heterogeneous, and multifactorial in nature. Although the importance of rehabilitation interventions after intensive care unit (ICU) discharge is universally recognized, evidence on feasibility and effectiveness of home-based rehabilitation programs is scarce and ambiguous. This study investigates the feasibility of an interdisciplinary rehabilitation program designed for patients with Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) who are discharged home. METHODS: A mixed method, non-randomized, prospective pilot feasibility study was performed with a 6-month follow-up, comparing the intervention (REACH) with usual care. REACH was provided by trained professionals and included a patient-centered, interdisciplinary approach starting directly after hospital discharge. Primary outcomes were patient safety, satisfaction, adherence, referral need and health care usage. Secondary outcomes, measured at 3 timepoints, were functional exercise capacity, self-perceived health status, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), return to work and psychotrauma. Risk of undernutrition was assessed at baseline. RESULTS: 43 patients with a median mechanical ventilation duration of 8 (IQR:10) days, were included in the study and 79.1% completed 6-month follow-up. 19 patients received the intervention, 23 received usual care. Groups were similar for gender distribution and ICU length of stay. No adverse events occurred. REACH participants showed higher satisfaction with treatment and reported more allied health professional visits, while the usual care group reported more visits to medical specialists. Qualitative analysis identified positive experiences among REACH-professionals related to providing state-of-the-art interventions and sharing knowledge and expertise within an interprofessional network. Similar recovery was seen between groups on all secondary outcomes, but neither group reached reference values for HRQoL at 6 months. Larger return to work rates were seen in the REACH group. Prevalence of undernutrition at hospital discharge was high in both groups (> 80%), warranting the need for careful tuning of physical therapy and nutritional interventions. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that providing early, home-based rehabilitation interventions for patients with PICS-related symptoms is feasible and perceived positively by patients and professionals. When provided in an interdisciplinary collaborative network state of the art, person-centered interventions can be tailored to individual needs potentially increasing patient satisfaction, adherence, and efficacy. Registered in the Dutch Trial register: NL7792: https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7792, registered 7-06-2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-021-03709-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8339801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83398012021-08-06 Feasibility of a home-based interdisciplinary rehabilitation program for patients with Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: the REACH study Major, Mel E. Dettling-Ihnenfeldt, Daniela Ramaekers, Stephan P. J. Engelbert, Raoul H. H. van der Schaaf, Marike Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Survivors of critical illness experience long-term functional challenges, which are complex, heterogeneous, and multifactorial in nature. Although the importance of rehabilitation interventions after intensive care unit (ICU) discharge is universally recognized, evidence on feasibility and effectiveness of home-based rehabilitation programs is scarce and ambiguous. This study investigates the feasibility of an interdisciplinary rehabilitation program designed for patients with Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) who are discharged home. METHODS: A mixed method, non-randomized, prospective pilot feasibility study was performed with a 6-month follow-up, comparing the intervention (REACH) with usual care. REACH was provided by trained professionals and included a patient-centered, interdisciplinary approach starting directly after hospital discharge. Primary outcomes were patient safety, satisfaction, adherence, referral need and health care usage. Secondary outcomes, measured at 3 timepoints, were functional exercise capacity, self-perceived health status, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), return to work and psychotrauma. Risk of undernutrition was assessed at baseline. RESULTS: 43 patients with a median mechanical ventilation duration of 8 (IQR:10) days, were included in the study and 79.1% completed 6-month follow-up. 19 patients received the intervention, 23 received usual care. Groups were similar for gender distribution and ICU length of stay. No adverse events occurred. REACH participants showed higher satisfaction with treatment and reported more allied health professional visits, while the usual care group reported more visits to medical specialists. Qualitative analysis identified positive experiences among REACH-professionals related to providing state-of-the-art interventions and sharing knowledge and expertise within an interprofessional network. Similar recovery was seen between groups on all secondary outcomes, but neither group reached reference values for HRQoL at 6 months. Larger return to work rates were seen in the REACH group. Prevalence of undernutrition at hospital discharge was high in both groups (> 80%), warranting the need for careful tuning of physical therapy and nutritional interventions. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that providing early, home-based rehabilitation interventions for patients with PICS-related symptoms is feasible and perceived positively by patients and professionals. When provided in an interdisciplinary collaborative network state of the art, person-centered interventions can be tailored to individual needs potentially increasing patient satisfaction, adherence, and efficacy. Registered in the Dutch Trial register: NL7792: https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7792, registered 7-06-2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-021-03709-z. BioMed Central 2021-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8339801/ /pubmed/34353341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03709-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Major, Mel E.
Dettling-Ihnenfeldt, Daniela
Ramaekers, Stephan P. J.
Engelbert, Raoul H. H.
van der Schaaf, Marike
Feasibility of a home-based interdisciplinary rehabilitation program for patients with Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: the REACH study
title Feasibility of a home-based interdisciplinary rehabilitation program for patients with Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: the REACH study
title_full Feasibility of a home-based interdisciplinary rehabilitation program for patients with Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: the REACH study
title_fullStr Feasibility of a home-based interdisciplinary rehabilitation program for patients with Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: the REACH study
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of a home-based interdisciplinary rehabilitation program for patients with Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: the REACH study
title_short Feasibility of a home-based interdisciplinary rehabilitation program for patients with Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: the REACH study
title_sort feasibility of a home-based interdisciplinary rehabilitation program for patients with post-intensive care syndrome: the reach study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8339801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34353341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03709-z
work_keys_str_mv AT majormele feasibilityofahomebasedinterdisciplinaryrehabilitationprogramforpatientswithpostintensivecaresyndromethereachstudy
AT dettlingihnenfeldtdaniela feasibilityofahomebasedinterdisciplinaryrehabilitationprogramforpatientswithpostintensivecaresyndromethereachstudy
AT ramaekersstephanpj feasibilityofahomebasedinterdisciplinaryrehabilitationprogramforpatientswithpostintensivecaresyndromethereachstudy
AT engelbertraoulhh feasibilityofahomebasedinterdisciplinaryrehabilitationprogramforpatientswithpostintensivecaresyndromethereachstudy
AT vanderschaafmarike feasibilityofahomebasedinterdisciplinaryrehabilitationprogramforpatientswithpostintensivecaresyndromethereachstudy