Cargando…

Efficacy of Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography in Diagnosis of Metastatic Cervical Lymph Nodes in Orofacial Cancer

INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus on which imaging modality is better for the detection of metastatic cervical lymph nodes in orofacial malignancies. This study evaluates the efficacy of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) in diagnosis of metastatic cervical lymph nodes in orofacial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okeke, Uche-Albert, Ajike, Sunday-Olusegun, Saheeb, Birch-Dauda, Igashi, Joseph-Bako
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8339894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34395319
http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/ijorl.2021.49018.2628
_version_ 1783733691689730048
author Okeke, Uche-Albert
Ajike, Sunday-Olusegun
Saheeb, Birch-Dauda
Igashi, Joseph-Bako
author_facet Okeke, Uche-Albert
Ajike, Sunday-Olusegun
Saheeb, Birch-Dauda
Igashi, Joseph-Bako
author_sort Okeke, Uche-Albert
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus on which imaging modality is better for the detection of metastatic cervical lymph nodes in orofacial malignancies. This study evaluates the efficacy of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) in diagnosis of metastatic cervical lymph nodes in orofacial cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with various histologically diagnosed orofacial malignant lesions and clinical evidence of cervical lymph node metastasis were examined using US and CT. Further, the affected lymph nodes were biopsied and examined histologically. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of the techniques were calculated. The data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 19 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and Microsoft Excel 2010 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). Test of statistical significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: US recorded a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 80.0%, 57.1%, 77.5%, 60.0%, and 71.7%, respectively (P = 0.004), while CT recorded a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 87.1%, 71.4%, 85.0%, 75.0%, and 81.7%, respectively (P< 0.0001). Lymph node size was the commonest criterion in the diagnoses of metastases in cases with cervical lymph nodes. CONCLUSION: Although we obtained great results using US, our results indicated CT to be a better imaging modality for detecting metastatic cervical lymph nodes in orofacial malignancies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8339894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83398942021-08-12 Efficacy of Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography in Diagnosis of Metastatic Cervical Lymph Nodes in Orofacial Cancer Okeke, Uche-Albert Ajike, Sunday-Olusegun Saheeb, Birch-Dauda Igashi, Joseph-Bako Iran J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus on which imaging modality is better for the detection of metastatic cervical lymph nodes in orofacial malignancies. This study evaluates the efficacy of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) in diagnosis of metastatic cervical lymph nodes in orofacial cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with various histologically diagnosed orofacial malignant lesions and clinical evidence of cervical lymph node metastasis were examined using US and CT. Further, the affected lymph nodes were biopsied and examined histologically. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of the techniques were calculated. The data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 19 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and Microsoft Excel 2010 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). Test of statistical significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: US recorded a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 80.0%, 57.1%, 77.5%, 60.0%, and 71.7%, respectively (P = 0.004), while CT recorded a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 87.1%, 71.4%, 85.0%, 75.0%, and 81.7%, respectively (P< 0.0001). Lymph node size was the commonest criterion in the diagnoses of metastases in cases with cervical lymph nodes. CONCLUSION: Although we obtained great results using US, our results indicated CT to be a better imaging modality for detecting metastatic cervical lymph nodes in orofacial malignancies. Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8339894/ /pubmed/34395319 http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/ijorl.2021.49018.2628 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Okeke, Uche-Albert
Ajike, Sunday-Olusegun
Saheeb, Birch-Dauda
Igashi, Joseph-Bako
Efficacy of Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography in Diagnosis of Metastatic Cervical Lymph Nodes in Orofacial Cancer
title Efficacy of Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography in Diagnosis of Metastatic Cervical Lymph Nodes in Orofacial Cancer
title_full Efficacy of Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography in Diagnosis of Metastatic Cervical Lymph Nodes in Orofacial Cancer
title_fullStr Efficacy of Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography in Diagnosis of Metastatic Cervical Lymph Nodes in Orofacial Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography in Diagnosis of Metastatic Cervical Lymph Nodes in Orofacial Cancer
title_short Efficacy of Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography in Diagnosis of Metastatic Cervical Lymph Nodes in Orofacial Cancer
title_sort efficacy of computed tomography and ultrasonography in diagnosis of metastatic cervical lymph nodes in orofacial cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8339894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34395319
http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/ijorl.2021.49018.2628
work_keys_str_mv AT okekeuchealbert efficacyofcomputedtomographyandultrasonographyindiagnosisofmetastaticcervicallymphnodesinorofacialcancer
AT ajikesundayolusegun efficacyofcomputedtomographyandultrasonographyindiagnosisofmetastaticcervicallymphnodesinorofacialcancer
AT saheebbirchdauda efficacyofcomputedtomographyandultrasonographyindiagnosisofmetastaticcervicallymphnodesinorofacialcancer
AT igashijosephbako efficacyofcomputedtomographyandultrasonographyindiagnosisofmetastaticcervicallymphnodesinorofacialcancer