Cargando…
Radiofrequency denervation of the lumbar facet joints: guidelines for the RADICAL randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The RADICAL trial has been funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency denervation (RFD) for low back pain. Recommendations have been published which aim to standardise selection of patients and RFD...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8339950/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34377456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2049463720941053 |
_version_ | 1783733704327168000 |
---|---|
author | Price, Cathy Reeves, Barney Ahmad, Alia Baloch, Mohjir Baranidharan, Ganesan Correa, Robin McCormick, Tim Sharma, Manohar Veemarajan, Bala Grimwood, Margot Pirie, Katrina Ishbel Wylde, Vikki |
author_facet | Price, Cathy Reeves, Barney Ahmad, Alia Baloch, Mohjir Baranidharan, Ganesan Correa, Robin McCormick, Tim Sharma, Manohar Veemarajan, Bala Grimwood, Margot Pirie, Katrina Ishbel Wylde, Vikki |
author_sort | Price, Cathy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIM: The RADICAL trial has been funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency denervation (RFD) for low back pain. Recommendations have been published which aim to standardise selection of patients and RFD technique. However, it is important to ensure these recommendations are acceptable to clinicians within the context of the trial. The aim of this work was to develop standardised criteria for the trial entry and RFD technique for implementation within the RADICAL trial. METHODS: Fourteen pain clinicians completed a survey, which involved reviewing the current recommendations and indicating whether they disagreed with any of the recommendations and if so why. Responses were collated and presented at a half-day workshop with 14 attendees. During the workshop, the National Low Back and Radicular Pain Pathway (NLBRPP) guidelines for patient selection and an article by Eldabe and colleagues presenting recommendations on the RFD technique were reviewed. Attendees discussed whether each component of the recommendations should be mandatory, mandatory with alteration or clarification or optional within the RADICAL trial. RESULTS: Attendees agreed during the workshop that 5 of the 10 criteria for patient selection described in the NLBRPP should be mandatory within the RADICAL trial. Three were agreed as mandatory criteria but required further clarification, one of which involved defining a positive response to a diagnostic medial branch block as ⩾60% pain relief. Two criteria had optional components. After reviewing the recommendations on the RFD technique from Eldabe and colleagues, seven components were agreed as mandatory, three were mandatory with alterations and three were optional. CONCLUSION: When evaluating complex interventions, such as RFD, it is important to ensure agreement and clarity on the clinical protocol, so that the intervention can be reproduced, if found to be effective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8339950 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83399502021-08-09 Radiofrequency denervation of the lumbar facet joints: guidelines for the RADICAL randomised controlled trial Price, Cathy Reeves, Barney Ahmad, Alia Baloch, Mohjir Baranidharan, Ganesan Correa, Robin McCormick, Tim Sharma, Manohar Veemarajan, Bala Grimwood, Margot Pirie, Katrina Ishbel Wylde, Vikki Br J Pain Articles BACKGROUND AND AIM: The RADICAL trial has been funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency denervation (RFD) for low back pain. Recommendations have been published which aim to standardise selection of patients and RFD technique. However, it is important to ensure these recommendations are acceptable to clinicians within the context of the trial. The aim of this work was to develop standardised criteria for the trial entry and RFD technique for implementation within the RADICAL trial. METHODS: Fourteen pain clinicians completed a survey, which involved reviewing the current recommendations and indicating whether they disagreed with any of the recommendations and if so why. Responses were collated and presented at a half-day workshop with 14 attendees. During the workshop, the National Low Back and Radicular Pain Pathway (NLBRPP) guidelines for patient selection and an article by Eldabe and colleagues presenting recommendations on the RFD technique were reviewed. Attendees discussed whether each component of the recommendations should be mandatory, mandatory with alteration or clarification or optional within the RADICAL trial. RESULTS: Attendees agreed during the workshop that 5 of the 10 criteria for patient selection described in the NLBRPP should be mandatory within the RADICAL trial. Three were agreed as mandatory criteria but required further clarification, one of which involved defining a positive response to a diagnostic medial branch block as ⩾60% pain relief. Two criteria had optional components. After reviewing the recommendations on the RFD technique from Eldabe and colleagues, seven components were agreed as mandatory, three were mandatory with alterations and three were optional. CONCLUSION: When evaluating complex interventions, such as RFD, it is important to ensure agreement and clarity on the clinical protocol, so that the intervention can be reproduced, if found to be effective. SAGE Publications 2020-07-17 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8339950/ /pubmed/34377456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2049463720941053 Text en © The British Pain Society 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Articles Price, Cathy Reeves, Barney Ahmad, Alia Baloch, Mohjir Baranidharan, Ganesan Correa, Robin McCormick, Tim Sharma, Manohar Veemarajan, Bala Grimwood, Margot Pirie, Katrina Ishbel Wylde, Vikki Radiofrequency denervation of the lumbar facet joints: guidelines for the RADICAL randomised controlled trial |
title | Radiofrequency denervation of the lumbar facet joints: guidelines for
the RADICAL randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Radiofrequency denervation of the lumbar facet joints: guidelines for
the RADICAL randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Radiofrequency denervation of the lumbar facet joints: guidelines for
the RADICAL randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiofrequency denervation of the lumbar facet joints: guidelines for
the RADICAL randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Radiofrequency denervation of the lumbar facet joints: guidelines for
the RADICAL randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | radiofrequency denervation of the lumbar facet joints: guidelines for
the radical randomised controlled trial |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8339950/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34377456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2049463720941053 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pricecathy radiofrequencydenervationofthelumbarfacetjointsguidelinesfortheradicalrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT reevesbarney radiofrequencydenervationofthelumbarfacetjointsguidelinesfortheradicalrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ahmadalia radiofrequencydenervationofthelumbarfacetjointsguidelinesfortheradicalrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT balochmohjir radiofrequencydenervationofthelumbarfacetjointsguidelinesfortheradicalrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT baranidharanganesan radiofrequencydenervationofthelumbarfacetjointsguidelinesfortheradicalrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT correarobin radiofrequencydenervationofthelumbarfacetjointsguidelinesfortheradicalrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mccormicktim radiofrequencydenervationofthelumbarfacetjointsguidelinesfortheradicalrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sharmamanohar radiofrequencydenervationofthelumbarfacetjointsguidelinesfortheradicalrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT veemarajanbala radiofrequencydenervationofthelumbarfacetjointsguidelinesfortheradicalrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT grimwoodmargot radiofrequencydenervationofthelumbarfacetjointsguidelinesfortheradicalrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT piriekatrinaishbel radiofrequencydenervationofthelumbarfacetjointsguidelinesfortheradicalrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT wyldevikki radiofrequencydenervationofthelumbarfacetjointsguidelinesfortheradicalrandomisedcontrolledtrial |