Cargando…
Comparison of Freelite and N-Latex serum free light chain assays: a critical review
INTRODUCTION: The measurement of serum free light chain (FLC) represents a fundamental aspect on the assessment of patients with monoclonal gammopathies (MG). Different analytical methods for FLC have become available with the possibility to obtain different value with a substantial impact on the as...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8340501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393594 http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2021.030701 |
_version_ | 1783733786815496192 |
---|---|
author | Daves, Massimo Piccin, Andrea Roccaforte, Vincenzo Lippi, Giuseppe |
author_facet | Daves, Massimo Piccin, Andrea Roccaforte, Vincenzo Lippi, Giuseppe |
author_sort | Daves, Massimo |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The measurement of serum free light chain (FLC) represents a fundamental aspect on the assessment of patients with monoclonal gammopathies (MG). Different analytical methods for FLC have become available with the possibility to obtain different value with a substantial impact on the assessment of patients with MG. This study aimed to evaluate FLC results obtained with two different assays and how the difference value obtained can impact in the patient’s assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-three patient serum samples that underwent analysis for FLC with two different methods, Serum Freelite (The Binding Site, Birmingham, UK) and N-Latex FLC (Siemens, Marburg, Germany), were included in this retrospective study. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate correlation, difference, and the grade of concordance between the results obtained with the two methods. RESULTS: Significant statistical differences between the results obtained from the two methods were found (P < 0.05). A good correlation was found (0.99 for κ FLC, 0.95 for λ FLC, and 0.94 for the κ/λ ratio, respectively). We found a weighted kappa value of 0.65 for κ/λ ratio, 0.65 for λ FLC and 0.90 for κ FLC. A positive bias found with the Bland-Altman plot mirrors overestimation of κ FLC and κ/λ ratio with Freelite compared to N-Latex, whilst a negative bias underscores underestimation of λ FLC by Freelite compared to N-Latex. CONCLUSION: Although in general the concordance between Freelite and N-Latex appears satisfactory, several discrepancies could be evidenced and consequently the two assays are not interchangeable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8340501 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83405012021-08-12 Comparison of Freelite and N-Latex serum free light chain assays: a critical review Daves, Massimo Piccin, Andrea Roccaforte, Vincenzo Lippi, Giuseppe Biochem Med (Zagreb) Original Articles INTRODUCTION: The measurement of serum free light chain (FLC) represents a fundamental aspect on the assessment of patients with monoclonal gammopathies (MG). Different analytical methods for FLC have become available with the possibility to obtain different value with a substantial impact on the assessment of patients with MG. This study aimed to evaluate FLC results obtained with two different assays and how the difference value obtained can impact in the patient’s assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-three patient serum samples that underwent analysis for FLC with two different methods, Serum Freelite (The Binding Site, Birmingham, UK) and N-Latex FLC (Siemens, Marburg, Germany), were included in this retrospective study. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate correlation, difference, and the grade of concordance between the results obtained with the two methods. RESULTS: Significant statistical differences between the results obtained from the two methods were found (P < 0.05). A good correlation was found (0.99 for κ FLC, 0.95 for λ FLC, and 0.94 for the κ/λ ratio, respectively). We found a weighted kappa value of 0.65 for κ/λ ratio, 0.65 for λ FLC and 0.90 for κ FLC. A positive bias found with the Bland-Altman plot mirrors overestimation of κ FLC and κ/λ ratio with Freelite compared to N-Latex, whilst a negative bias underscores underestimation of λ FLC by Freelite compared to N-Latex. CONCLUSION: Although in general the concordance between Freelite and N-Latex appears satisfactory, several discrepancies could be evidenced and consequently the two assays are not interchangeable. Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine 2021-08-05 2021-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8340501/ /pubmed/34393594 http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2021.030701 Text en Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Daves, Massimo Piccin, Andrea Roccaforte, Vincenzo Lippi, Giuseppe Comparison of Freelite and N-Latex serum free light chain assays: a critical review |
title | Comparison of Freelite and N-Latex serum free light chain assays: a critical review |
title_full | Comparison of Freelite and N-Latex serum free light chain assays: a critical review |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Freelite and N-Latex serum free light chain assays: a critical review |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Freelite and N-Latex serum free light chain assays: a critical review |
title_short | Comparison of Freelite and N-Latex serum free light chain assays: a critical review |
title_sort | comparison of freelite and n-latex serum free light chain assays: a critical review |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8340501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393594 http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2021.030701 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davesmassimo comparisonoffreeliteandnlatexserumfreelightchainassaysacriticalreview AT piccinandrea comparisonoffreeliteandnlatexserumfreelightchainassaysacriticalreview AT roccafortevincenzo comparisonoffreeliteandnlatexserumfreelightchainassaysacriticalreview AT lippigiuseppe comparisonoffreeliteandnlatexserumfreelightchainassaysacriticalreview |