Cargando…

Comparison of Freelite and N-Latex serum free light chain assays: a critical review

INTRODUCTION: The measurement of serum free light chain (FLC) represents a fundamental aspect on the assessment of patients with monoclonal gammopathies (MG). Different analytical methods for FLC have become available with the possibility to obtain different value with a substantial impact on the as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daves, Massimo, Piccin, Andrea, Roccaforte, Vincenzo, Lippi, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8340501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393594
http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2021.030701
_version_ 1783733786815496192
author Daves, Massimo
Piccin, Andrea
Roccaforte, Vincenzo
Lippi, Giuseppe
author_facet Daves, Massimo
Piccin, Andrea
Roccaforte, Vincenzo
Lippi, Giuseppe
author_sort Daves, Massimo
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The measurement of serum free light chain (FLC) represents a fundamental aspect on the assessment of patients with monoclonal gammopathies (MG). Different analytical methods for FLC have become available with the possibility to obtain different value with a substantial impact on the assessment of patients with MG. This study aimed to evaluate FLC results obtained with two different assays and how the difference value obtained can impact in the patient’s assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-three patient serum samples that underwent analysis for FLC with two different methods, Serum Freelite (The Binding Site, Birmingham, UK) and N-Latex FLC (Siemens, Marburg, Germany), were included in this retrospective study. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate correlation, difference, and the grade of concordance between the results obtained with the two methods. RESULTS: Significant statistical differences between the results obtained from the two methods were found (P < 0.05). A good correlation was found (0.99 for κ FLC, 0.95 for λ FLC, and 0.94 for the κ/λ ratio, respectively). We found a weighted kappa value of 0.65 for κ/λ ratio, 0.65 for λ FLC and 0.90 for κ FLC. A positive bias found with the Bland-Altman plot mirrors overestimation of κ FLC and κ/λ ratio with Freelite compared to N-Latex, whilst a negative bias underscores underestimation of λ FLC by Freelite compared to N-Latex. CONCLUSION: Although in general the concordance between Freelite and N-Latex appears satisfactory, several discrepancies could be evidenced and consequently the two assays are not interchangeable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8340501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83405012021-08-12 Comparison of Freelite and N-Latex serum free light chain assays: a critical review Daves, Massimo Piccin, Andrea Roccaforte, Vincenzo Lippi, Giuseppe Biochem Med (Zagreb) Original Articles INTRODUCTION: The measurement of serum free light chain (FLC) represents a fundamental aspect on the assessment of patients with monoclonal gammopathies (MG). Different analytical methods for FLC have become available with the possibility to obtain different value with a substantial impact on the assessment of patients with MG. This study aimed to evaluate FLC results obtained with two different assays and how the difference value obtained can impact in the patient’s assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-three patient serum samples that underwent analysis for FLC with two different methods, Serum Freelite (The Binding Site, Birmingham, UK) and N-Latex FLC (Siemens, Marburg, Germany), were included in this retrospective study. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate correlation, difference, and the grade of concordance between the results obtained with the two methods. RESULTS: Significant statistical differences between the results obtained from the two methods were found (P < 0.05). A good correlation was found (0.99 for κ FLC, 0.95 for λ FLC, and 0.94 for the κ/λ ratio, respectively). We found a weighted kappa value of 0.65 for κ/λ ratio, 0.65 for λ FLC and 0.90 for κ FLC. A positive bias found with the Bland-Altman plot mirrors overestimation of κ FLC and κ/λ ratio with Freelite compared to N-Latex, whilst a negative bias underscores underestimation of λ FLC by Freelite compared to N-Latex. CONCLUSION: Although in general the concordance between Freelite and N-Latex appears satisfactory, several discrepancies could be evidenced and consequently the two assays are not interchangeable. Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine 2021-08-05 2021-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8340501/ /pubmed/34393594 http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2021.030701 Text en Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Daves, Massimo
Piccin, Andrea
Roccaforte, Vincenzo
Lippi, Giuseppe
Comparison of Freelite and N-Latex serum free light chain assays: a critical review
title Comparison of Freelite and N-Latex serum free light chain assays: a critical review
title_full Comparison of Freelite and N-Latex serum free light chain assays: a critical review
title_fullStr Comparison of Freelite and N-Latex serum free light chain assays: a critical review
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Freelite and N-Latex serum free light chain assays: a critical review
title_short Comparison of Freelite and N-Latex serum free light chain assays: a critical review
title_sort comparison of freelite and n-latex serum free light chain assays: a critical review
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8340501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393594
http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2021.030701
work_keys_str_mv AT davesmassimo comparisonoffreeliteandnlatexserumfreelightchainassaysacriticalreview
AT piccinandrea comparisonoffreeliteandnlatexserumfreelightchainassaysacriticalreview
AT roccafortevincenzo comparisonoffreeliteandnlatexserumfreelightchainassaysacriticalreview
AT lippigiuseppe comparisonoffreeliteandnlatexserumfreelightchainassaysacriticalreview