Cargando…
Real-world evaluation of COVID-19 lateral flow device (LFD) mass-testing in healthcare workers at a London hospital; a prospective cohort analysis
OBJECTIVES: Real-world evaluation of the performance of the Innova lateral flow immunoassay antigen device (LFD) for regular COVID-19 testing of hospital workers. METHODS: This prospective cohort analysis took place at a London NHS Trust. 5076 secondary care healthcare staff participated in LFD test...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8340567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34364950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2021.07.038 |
_version_ | 1783733800155480064 |
---|---|
author | Lamb, Georgia Heskin, Joseph Randell, Paul Mughal, Nabeela Moore, Luke SP Jones, Rachael Davies, Gary W Rayment, Michael |
author_facet | Lamb, Georgia Heskin, Joseph Randell, Paul Mughal, Nabeela Moore, Luke SP Jones, Rachael Davies, Gary W Rayment, Michael |
author_sort | Lamb, Georgia |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Real-world evaluation of the performance of the Innova lateral flow immunoassay antigen device (LFD) for regular COVID-19 testing of hospital workers. METHODS: This prospective cohort analysis took place at a London NHS Trust. 5076 secondary care healthcare staff participated in LFD testing from 18 November 2020 to21 January 2021. Staff members submitted results and symptoms via an online portal twice weekly. Individuals with positive LFD results were invited for confirmatory SARS CoV-2 PCR testing. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the LFD was measured. Secondary outcome measures included time from LFD result to PCR test and staff symptom profiles. RESULTS: 284/5076 individuals reported a valid positive LFD result, and a paired PCR result was obtained in 259/284 (91.2%). 244 were PCR positive yielding a PPV of 94.21% (244/259, 95% CI 90.73% to 96.43%). 204/259 (78.8%) staff members had the PCR within 36 hours of the LFD test. Symptom profiles were confirmed for 132/244 staff members (54.1%) with positive PCR results (true positives) and 13/15 (86.6%) with negative PCR results (false positives). 91/132 true positives (68.9%) were symptomatic at the time of LFD testing: 65/91 (71.4%) had symptoms meeting the PHE case definition of COVID-19, whilst 26/91 (28.6%) had atypical symptoms. 18/41 (43.9%) staff members who were asymptomatic at the time of positive LFD developed symptoms in the subsequent four days. 9/13 (76.9%) false positives were asymptomatic, 1/13 (7.7%) had atypical symptoms and 3/13 (23.1%) had symptoms matching the PHE case definition. CONCLUSIONS: The PPV of the Innova LFD is high when used amongst hospital staff during periods of high prevalence of COVID-19, yet we find frequent use by symptomatic staff rather than as a purely asymptomatic screening tool. LFD testing does allow earlier isolation of infected workers and facilitates detection of individuals whose symptoms do not qualify for PCR testing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8340567 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83405672021-08-06 Real-world evaluation of COVID-19 lateral flow device (LFD) mass-testing in healthcare workers at a London hospital; a prospective cohort analysis Lamb, Georgia Heskin, Joseph Randell, Paul Mughal, Nabeela Moore, Luke SP Jones, Rachael Davies, Gary W Rayment, Michael J Infect Commentary OBJECTIVES: Real-world evaluation of the performance of the Innova lateral flow immunoassay antigen device (LFD) for regular COVID-19 testing of hospital workers. METHODS: This prospective cohort analysis took place at a London NHS Trust. 5076 secondary care healthcare staff participated in LFD testing from 18 November 2020 to21 January 2021. Staff members submitted results and symptoms via an online portal twice weekly. Individuals with positive LFD results were invited for confirmatory SARS CoV-2 PCR testing. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the LFD was measured. Secondary outcome measures included time from LFD result to PCR test and staff symptom profiles. RESULTS: 284/5076 individuals reported a valid positive LFD result, and a paired PCR result was obtained in 259/284 (91.2%). 244 were PCR positive yielding a PPV of 94.21% (244/259, 95% CI 90.73% to 96.43%). 204/259 (78.8%) staff members had the PCR within 36 hours of the LFD test. Symptom profiles were confirmed for 132/244 staff members (54.1%) with positive PCR results (true positives) and 13/15 (86.6%) with negative PCR results (false positives). 91/132 true positives (68.9%) were symptomatic at the time of LFD testing: 65/91 (71.4%) had symptoms meeting the PHE case definition of COVID-19, whilst 26/91 (28.6%) had atypical symptoms. 18/41 (43.9%) staff members who were asymptomatic at the time of positive LFD developed symptoms in the subsequent four days. 9/13 (76.9%) false positives were asymptomatic, 1/13 (7.7%) had atypical symptoms and 3/13 (23.1%) had symptoms matching the PHE case definition. CONCLUSIONS: The PPV of the Innova LFD is high when used amongst hospital staff during periods of high prevalence of COVID-19, yet we find frequent use by symptomatic staff rather than as a purely asymptomatic screening tool. LFD testing does allow earlier isolation of infected workers and facilitates detection of individuals whose symptoms do not qualify for PCR testing. The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021-10 2021-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8340567/ /pubmed/34364950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2021.07.038 Text en © 2021 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Lamb, Georgia Heskin, Joseph Randell, Paul Mughal, Nabeela Moore, Luke SP Jones, Rachael Davies, Gary W Rayment, Michael Real-world evaluation of COVID-19 lateral flow device (LFD) mass-testing in healthcare workers at a London hospital; a prospective cohort analysis |
title | Real-world evaluation of COVID-19 lateral flow device (LFD) mass-testing in healthcare workers at a London hospital; a prospective cohort analysis |
title_full | Real-world evaluation of COVID-19 lateral flow device (LFD) mass-testing in healthcare workers at a London hospital; a prospective cohort analysis |
title_fullStr | Real-world evaluation of COVID-19 lateral flow device (LFD) mass-testing in healthcare workers at a London hospital; a prospective cohort analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Real-world evaluation of COVID-19 lateral flow device (LFD) mass-testing in healthcare workers at a London hospital; a prospective cohort analysis |
title_short | Real-world evaluation of COVID-19 lateral flow device (LFD) mass-testing in healthcare workers at a London hospital; a prospective cohort analysis |
title_sort | real-world evaluation of covid-19 lateral flow device (lfd) mass-testing in healthcare workers at a london hospital; a prospective cohort analysis |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8340567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34364950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2021.07.038 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lambgeorgia realworldevaluationofcovid19lateralflowdevicelfdmasstestinginhealthcareworkersatalondonhospitalaprospectivecohortanalysis AT heskinjoseph realworldevaluationofcovid19lateralflowdevicelfdmasstestinginhealthcareworkersatalondonhospitalaprospectivecohortanalysis AT randellpaul realworldevaluationofcovid19lateralflowdevicelfdmasstestinginhealthcareworkersatalondonhospitalaprospectivecohortanalysis AT mughalnabeela realworldevaluationofcovid19lateralflowdevicelfdmasstestinginhealthcareworkersatalondonhospitalaprospectivecohortanalysis AT moorelukesp realworldevaluationofcovid19lateralflowdevicelfdmasstestinginhealthcareworkersatalondonhospitalaprospectivecohortanalysis AT jonesrachael realworldevaluationofcovid19lateralflowdevicelfdmasstestinginhealthcareworkersatalondonhospitalaprospectivecohortanalysis AT daviesgaryw realworldevaluationofcovid19lateralflowdevicelfdmasstestinginhealthcareworkersatalondonhospitalaprospectivecohortanalysis AT raymentmichael realworldevaluationofcovid19lateralflowdevicelfdmasstestinginhealthcareworkersatalondonhospitalaprospectivecohortanalysis |