Cargando…

Real-world evaluation of COVID-19 lateral flow device (LFD) mass-testing in healthcare workers at a London hospital; a prospective cohort analysis

OBJECTIVES: Real-world evaluation of the performance of the Innova lateral flow immunoassay antigen device (LFD) for regular COVID-19 testing of hospital workers. METHODS: This prospective cohort analysis took place at a London NHS Trust. 5076 secondary care healthcare staff participated in LFD test...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lamb, Georgia, Heskin, Joseph, Randell, Paul, Mughal, Nabeela, Moore, Luke SP, Jones, Rachael, Davies, Gary W, Rayment, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8340567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34364950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2021.07.038
_version_ 1783733800155480064
author Lamb, Georgia
Heskin, Joseph
Randell, Paul
Mughal, Nabeela
Moore, Luke SP
Jones, Rachael
Davies, Gary W
Rayment, Michael
author_facet Lamb, Georgia
Heskin, Joseph
Randell, Paul
Mughal, Nabeela
Moore, Luke SP
Jones, Rachael
Davies, Gary W
Rayment, Michael
author_sort Lamb, Georgia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Real-world evaluation of the performance of the Innova lateral flow immunoassay antigen device (LFD) for regular COVID-19 testing of hospital workers. METHODS: This prospective cohort analysis took place at a London NHS Trust. 5076 secondary care healthcare staff participated in LFD testing from 18 November 2020 to21 January 2021. Staff members submitted results and symptoms via an online portal twice weekly. Individuals with positive LFD results were invited for confirmatory SARS CoV-2 PCR testing. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the LFD was measured. Secondary outcome measures included time from LFD result to PCR test and staff symptom profiles. RESULTS: 284/5076 individuals reported a valid positive LFD result, and a paired PCR result was obtained in 259/284 (91.2%). 244 were PCR positive yielding a PPV of 94.21% (244/259, 95% CI 90.73% to 96.43%). 204/259 (78.8%) staff members had the PCR within 36 hours of the LFD test. Symptom profiles were confirmed for 132/244 staff members (54.1%) with positive PCR results (true positives) and 13/15 (86.6%) with negative PCR results (false positives). 91/132 true positives (68.9%) were symptomatic at the time of LFD testing: 65/91 (71.4%) had symptoms meeting the PHE case definition of COVID-19, whilst 26/91 (28.6%) had atypical symptoms. 18/41 (43.9%) staff members who were asymptomatic at the time of positive LFD developed symptoms in the subsequent four days. 9/13 (76.9%) false positives were asymptomatic, 1/13 (7.7%) had atypical symptoms and 3/13 (23.1%) had symptoms matching the PHE case definition. CONCLUSIONS: The PPV of the Innova LFD is high when used amongst hospital staff during periods of high prevalence of COVID-19, yet we find frequent use by symptomatic staff rather than as a purely asymptomatic screening tool. LFD testing does allow earlier isolation of infected workers and facilitates detection of individuals whose symptoms do not qualify for PCR testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8340567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83405672021-08-06 Real-world evaluation of COVID-19 lateral flow device (LFD) mass-testing in healthcare workers at a London hospital; a prospective cohort analysis Lamb, Georgia Heskin, Joseph Randell, Paul Mughal, Nabeela Moore, Luke SP Jones, Rachael Davies, Gary W Rayment, Michael J Infect Commentary OBJECTIVES: Real-world evaluation of the performance of the Innova lateral flow immunoassay antigen device (LFD) for regular COVID-19 testing of hospital workers. METHODS: This prospective cohort analysis took place at a London NHS Trust. 5076 secondary care healthcare staff participated in LFD testing from 18 November 2020 to21 January 2021. Staff members submitted results and symptoms via an online portal twice weekly. Individuals with positive LFD results were invited for confirmatory SARS CoV-2 PCR testing. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the LFD was measured. Secondary outcome measures included time from LFD result to PCR test and staff symptom profiles. RESULTS: 284/5076 individuals reported a valid positive LFD result, and a paired PCR result was obtained in 259/284 (91.2%). 244 were PCR positive yielding a PPV of 94.21% (244/259, 95% CI 90.73% to 96.43%). 204/259 (78.8%) staff members had the PCR within 36 hours of the LFD test. Symptom profiles were confirmed for 132/244 staff members (54.1%) with positive PCR results (true positives) and 13/15 (86.6%) with negative PCR results (false positives). 91/132 true positives (68.9%) were symptomatic at the time of LFD testing: 65/91 (71.4%) had symptoms meeting the PHE case definition of COVID-19, whilst 26/91 (28.6%) had atypical symptoms. 18/41 (43.9%) staff members who were asymptomatic at the time of positive LFD developed symptoms in the subsequent four days. 9/13 (76.9%) false positives were asymptomatic, 1/13 (7.7%) had atypical symptoms and 3/13 (23.1%) had symptoms matching the PHE case definition. CONCLUSIONS: The PPV of the Innova LFD is high when used amongst hospital staff during periods of high prevalence of COVID-19, yet we find frequent use by symptomatic staff rather than as a purely asymptomatic screening tool. LFD testing does allow earlier isolation of infected workers and facilitates detection of individuals whose symptoms do not qualify for PCR testing. The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021-10 2021-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8340567/ /pubmed/34364950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2021.07.038 Text en © 2021 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Commentary
Lamb, Georgia
Heskin, Joseph
Randell, Paul
Mughal, Nabeela
Moore, Luke SP
Jones, Rachael
Davies, Gary W
Rayment, Michael
Real-world evaluation of COVID-19 lateral flow device (LFD) mass-testing in healthcare workers at a London hospital; a prospective cohort analysis
title Real-world evaluation of COVID-19 lateral flow device (LFD) mass-testing in healthcare workers at a London hospital; a prospective cohort analysis
title_full Real-world evaluation of COVID-19 lateral flow device (LFD) mass-testing in healthcare workers at a London hospital; a prospective cohort analysis
title_fullStr Real-world evaluation of COVID-19 lateral flow device (LFD) mass-testing in healthcare workers at a London hospital; a prospective cohort analysis
title_full_unstemmed Real-world evaluation of COVID-19 lateral flow device (LFD) mass-testing in healthcare workers at a London hospital; a prospective cohort analysis
title_short Real-world evaluation of COVID-19 lateral flow device (LFD) mass-testing in healthcare workers at a London hospital; a prospective cohort analysis
title_sort real-world evaluation of covid-19 lateral flow device (lfd) mass-testing in healthcare workers at a london hospital; a prospective cohort analysis
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8340567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34364950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2021.07.038
work_keys_str_mv AT lambgeorgia realworldevaluationofcovid19lateralflowdevicelfdmasstestinginhealthcareworkersatalondonhospitalaprospectivecohortanalysis
AT heskinjoseph realworldevaluationofcovid19lateralflowdevicelfdmasstestinginhealthcareworkersatalondonhospitalaprospectivecohortanalysis
AT randellpaul realworldevaluationofcovid19lateralflowdevicelfdmasstestinginhealthcareworkersatalondonhospitalaprospectivecohortanalysis
AT mughalnabeela realworldevaluationofcovid19lateralflowdevicelfdmasstestinginhealthcareworkersatalondonhospitalaprospectivecohortanalysis
AT moorelukesp realworldevaluationofcovid19lateralflowdevicelfdmasstestinginhealthcareworkersatalondonhospitalaprospectivecohortanalysis
AT jonesrachael realworldevaluationofcovid19lateralflowdevicelfdmasstestinginhealthcareworkersatalondonhospitalaprospectivecohortanalysis
AT daviesgaryw realworldevaluationofcovid19lateralflowdevicelfdmasstestinginhealthcareworkersatalondonhospitalaprospectivecohortanalysis
AT raymentmichael realworldevaluationofcovid19lateralflowdevicelfdmasstestinginhealthcareworkersatalondonhospitalaprospectivecohortanalysis