Cargando…

Retinal Responses to Simulated Optical Blur Using a Novel Dead Leaves ERG Stimulus

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate retinal responses to different types and magnitudes of simulated optical blur presented at specific retinal eccentricities using naturalistic images. METHODS: Electroretinograms (ERGs) were recorded from 27 adults using 30-degree dead leaves natural...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Panorgias, Athanasios, Aigbe, Stephanie, Jeong, Emily, Otero, Carles, Bex, Peter J., Vera-Diaz, Fuensanta A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8340654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34338749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.62.10.1
_version_ 1783733812846395392
author Panorgias, Athanasios
Aigbe, Stephanie
Jeong, Emily
Otero, Carles
Bex, Peter J.
Vera-Diaz, Fuensanta A.
author_facet Panorgias, Athanasios
Aigbe, Stephanie
Jeong, Emily
Otero, Carles
Bex, Peter J.
Vera-Diaz, Fuensanta A.
author_sort Panorgias, Athanasios
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate retinal responses to different types and magnitudes of simulated optical blur presented at specific retinal eccentricities using naturalistic images. METHODS: Electroretinograms (ERGs) were recorded from 27 adults using 30-degree dead leaves naturalistic images, digitally blurred with one of three types of optical blur (defocus, astigmatism, and spherical aberrations), and one of three magnitudes (0.1, 0.3, or 0.5 µm) of blur. Digitally computed blur was applied to the entire image, or on an area outside the central 6 degrees or 12 degrees of retinal eccentricity. RESULTS: ERGs were significantly affected by blur type, magnitude, and retinal eccentricity. ERGs were differentially affected by defocus and spherical aberrations; however, astigmatism had no effect on the ERGs. When blur was applied only beyond the central 12 degrees eccentricity, the ERGs were unaffected. However, when blur was applied outside the central 6 degrees, the ERG responses were significantly reduced and were no different from the ERGs recorded with entirely blurred images. CONCLUSIONS: Blur type, magnitude, and location all affect the retinal responses. Our data indicate that the retinal area between 6 and 12 degrees eccentricity has the largest effect on the retinal responses to blur. In addition, certain optical blur types appear to have a more detrimental effect on the ERGs than others. These results cannot be solely explained by changes to image contrast and spatial frequency content, suggesting that retinal neurons might be sensitive to spatial cues in order to differentiate between different blur types.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8340654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83406542021-08-18 Retinal Responses to Simulated Optical Blur Using a Novel Dead Leaves ERG Stimulus Panorgias, Athanasios Aigbe, Stephanie Jeong, Emily Otero, Carles Bex, Peter J. Vera-Diaz, Fuensanta A. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Retina PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate retinal responses to different types and magnitudes of simulated optical blur presented at specific retinal eccentricities using naturalistic images. METHODS: Electroretinograms (ERGs) were recorded from 27 adults using 30-degree dead leaves naturalistic images, digitally blurred with one of three types of optical blur (defocus, astigmatism, and spherical aberrations), and one of three magnitudes (0.1, 0.3, or 0.5 µm) of blur. Digitally computed blur was applied to the entire image, or on an area outside the central 6 degrees or 12 degrees of retinal eccentricity. RESULTS: ERGs were significantly affected by blur type, magnitude, and retinal eccentricity. ERGs were differentially affected by defocus and spherical aberrations; however, astigmatism had no effect on the ERGs. When blur was applied only beyond the central 12 degrees eccentricity, the ERGs were unaffected. However, when blur was applied outside the central 6 degrees, the ERG responses were significantly reduced and were no different from the ERGs recorded with entirely blurred images. CONCLUSIONS: Blur type, magnitude, and location all affect the retinal responses. Our data indicate that the retinal area between 6 and 12 degrees eccentricity has the largest effect on the retinal responses to blur. In addition, certain optical blur types appear to have a more detrimental effect on the ERGs than others. These results cannot be solely explained by changes to image contrast and spatial frequency content, suggesting that retinal neurons might be sensitive to spatial cues in order to differentiate between different blur types. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8340654/ /pubmed/34338749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.62.10.1 Text en Copyright 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Retina
Panorgias, Athanasios
Aigbe, Stephanie
Jeong, Emily
Otero, Carles
Bex, Peter J.
Vera-Diaz, Fuensanta A.
Retinal Responses to Simulated Optical Blur Using a Novel Dead Leaves ERG Stimulus
title Retinal Responses to Simulated Optical Blur Using a Novel Dead Leaves ERG Stimulus
title_full Retinal Responses to Simulated Optical Blur Using a Novel Dead Leaves ERG Stimulus
title_fullStr Retinal Responses to Simulated Optical Blur Using a Novel Dead Leaves ERG Stimulus
title_full_unstemmed Retinal Responses to Simulated Optical Blur Using a Novel Dead Leaves ERG Stimulus
title_short Retinal Responses to Simulated Optical Blur Using a Novel Dead Leaves ERG Stimulus
title_sort retinal responses to simulated optical blur using a novel dead leaves erg stimulus
topic Retina
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8340654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34338749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.62.10.1
work_keys_str_mv AT panorgiasathanasios retinalresponsestosimulatedopticalblurusinganoveldeadleavesergstimulus
AT aigbestephanie retinalresponsestosimulatedopticalblurusinganoveldeadleavesergstimulus
AT jeongemily retinalresponsestosimulatedopticalblurusinganoveldeadleavesergstimulus
AT oterocarles retinalresponsestosimulatedopticalblurusinganoveldeadleavesergstimulus
AT bexpeterj retinalresponsestosimulatedopticalblurusinganoveldeadleavesergstimulus
AT veradiazfuensantaa retinalresponsestosimulatedopticalblurusinganoveldeadleavesergstimulus