Cargando…

The efficacy and safety of fire needle for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) is one of the most common types of cervical spondylosis, and its treatments are mainly for relieving radicular pain and improving dysfunction. The existing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest that fire needle may be a potential therapy in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xue, Kaiyang, Liu, Hong, Shi, Qiumei, Wang, Xianzhu, He, Yanqin, Cui, Jin, Fu, Jing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8341279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34397845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026824
_version_ 1783733898541268992
author Xue, Kaiyang
Liu, Hong
Shi, Qiumei
Wang, Xianzhu
He, Yanqin
Cui, Jin
Fu, Jing
author_facet Xue, Kaiyang
Liu, Hong
Shi, Qiumei
Wang, Xianzhu
He, Yanqin
Cui, Jin
Fu, Jing
author_sort Xue, Kaiyang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) is one of the most common types of cervical spondylosis, and its treatments are mainly for relieving radicular pain and improving dysfunction. The existing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest that fire needle may be a potential therapy in the treatment of CSR, but there is no evidence-based medical evidence to date. Therefore, this study will systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of fire needle in the treatment of CSR. METHODS: We will search for 7 electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Scientific Journals Database, Sinomed, and Wanfang Database) and 2 trial registration platforms (ClinicalTrials.gov and Chinese Clinic Trials.gov) to collect eligible studies. The RCTs related to fire needle for CSR and published up to June 30, 2021 will be included, regardless of language. We will consider the visual analogue scale as the primary outcome and the secondary outcome will include cervical range of motion, assessment of muscle strength, neck disability index, the MOS item short from health survey, activities of daily living, total efficiency, and adverse reactions. We will use the standard proposed in Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0 to assess the quality and bias risk of every RCT, and all analyses will be conducted through RevMan software V5.3 (Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Center, Cochrane, Collaborative Organization, 2014). RESULTS: This systematic review and meta-analysis will provide a convincing synthesis of existing evidences on the efficacy and safety of fire needle for CSR, and the results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. CONCLUSION: The results of this study will provide high-quality evidence of fire needle in the treatment of CSR for clinical decision-making. INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY202170041.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8341279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83412792021-08-07 The efficacy and safety of fire needle for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis Xue, Kaiyang Liu, Hong Shi, Qiumei Wang, Xianzhu He, Yanqin Cui, Jin Fu, Jing Medicine (Baltimore) 3800 BACKGROUND: Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) is one of the most common types of cervical spondylosis, and its treatments are mainly for relieving radicular pain and improving dysfunction. The existing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest that fire needle may be a potential therapy in the treatment of CSR, but there is no evidence-based medical evidence to date. Therefore, this study will systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of fire needle in the treatment of CSR. METHODS: We will search for 7 electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Scientific Journals Database, Sinomed, and Wanfang Database) and 2 trial registration platforms (ClinicalTrials.gov and Chinese Clinic Trials.gov) to collect eligible studies. The RCTs related to fire needle for CSR and published up to June 30, 2021 will be included, regardless of language. We will consider the visual analogue scale as the primary outcome and the secondary outcome will include cervical range of motion, assessment of muscle strength, neck disability index, the MOS item short from health survey, activities of daily living, total efficiency, and adverse reactions. We will use the standard proposed in Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0 to assess the quality and bias risk of every RCT, and all analyses will be conducted through RevMan software V5.3 (Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Center, Cochrane, Collaborative Organization, 2014). RESULTS: This systematic review and meta-analysis will provide a convincing synthesis of existing evidences on the efficacy and safety of fire needle for CSR, and the results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. CONCLUSION: The results of this study will provide high-quality evidence of fire needle in the treatment of CSR for clinical decision-making. INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY202170041. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8341279/ /pubmed/34397845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026824 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle 3800
Xue, Kaiyang
Liu, Hong
Shi, Qiumei
Wang, Xianzhu
He, Yanqin
Cui, Jin
Fu, Jing
The efficacy and safety of fire needle for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title The efficacy and safety of fire needle for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The efficacy and safety of fire needle for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The efficacy and safety of fire needle for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and safety of fire needle for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The efficacy and safety of fire needle for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of fire needle for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 3800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8341279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34397845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026824
work_keys_str_mv AT xuekaiyang theefficacyandsafetyoffireneedleforcervicalspondyloticradiculopathyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuhong theefficacyandsafetyoffireneedleforcervicalspondyloticradiculopathyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shiqiumei theefficacyandsafetyoffireneedleforcervicalspondyloticradiculopathyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangxianzhu theefficacyandsafetyoffireneedleforcervicalspondyloticradiculopathyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT heyanqin theefficacyandsafetyoffireneedleforcervicalspondyloticradiculopathyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cuijin theefficacyandsafetyoffireneedleforcervicalspondyloticradiculopathyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fujing theefficacyandsafetyoffireneedleforcervicalspondyloticradiculopathyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuekaiyang efficacyandsafetyoffireneedleforcervicalspondyloticradiculopathyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuhong efficacyandsafetyoffireneedleforcervicalspondyloticradiculopathyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shiqiumei efficacyandsafetyoffireneedleforcervicalspondyloticradiculopathyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangxianzhu efficacyandsafetyoffireneedleforcervicalspondyloticradiculopathyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT heyanqin efficacyandsafetyoffireneedleforcervicalspondyloticradiculopathyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cuijin efficacyandsafetyoffireneedleforcervicalspondyloticradiculopathyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fujing efficacyandsafetyoffireneedleforcervicalspondyloticradiculopathyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis