Cargando…

Comparison of ventriculoperitoneal shunt to lumboperitoneal shunt in the treatment of idiopathic: A monocentric, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) and lumboperitoneal shunt (LPS) remain the mainstay of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH). There are no randomized controlled trials completed to compare the efficacy of these 2 shunt techniques. METHODS/DESIGN: We will conduct a monocentric,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cui, Wenyao, Sun, Tong, Wu, Ke, You, Chao, Guan, Junwen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8341364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34397802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026691
_version_ 1783733911404150784
author Cui, Wenyao
Sun, Tong
Wu, Ke
You, Chao
Guan, Junwen
author_facet Cui, Wenyao
Sun, Tong
Wu, Ke
You, Chao
Guan, Junwen
author_sort Cui, Wenyao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) and lumboperitoneal shunt (LPS) remain the mainstay of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH). There are no randomized controlled trials completed to compare the efficacy of these 2 shunt techniques. METHODS/DESIGN: We will conduct a monocentric, assessor-blinded, and randomized controlled trial titled “Comparison of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt to Lumboperitoneal Shunt for the treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: Phase I (COVLINPH-1)” trial and recruit patients at West China Hospital of Sichuan University since June 2021. And this trial is expected to end in December 2030. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned into LPS group and VPS group at ratio of 1:1 followed by evaluation before surgery, 1 month, 12 months, and 5 years after surgery. The primary outcome is the rate of shunt failure within 5 years. The secondary outcomes include modified Rankin Scale (mRS), INPH grading scale (INPHGS), mini-mental state examination (MMSE), and Evans index. We will calculate the rate of favorable outcome, which is defined as shunt success and an improvement of more than 1 point in the mRS at evaluation point. We will also analyze the complications throughout the study within 5 years after shunt insertion. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial will provide state-of-the-art evidence on the treatment option for patients with INPH, and will also generate the discussion regarding this subject. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2000031555; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8341364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83413642021-08-07 Comparison of ventriculoperitoneal shunt to lumboperitoneal shunt in the treatment of idiopathic: A monocentric, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial Cui, Wenyao Sun, Tong Wu, Ke You, Chao Guan, Junwen Medicine (Baltimore) 5300 BACKGROUND: Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) and lumboperitoneal shunt (LPS) remain the mainstay of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH). There are no randomized controlled trials completed to compare the efficacy of these 2 shunt techniques. METHODS/DESIGN: We will conduct a monocentric, assessor-blinded, and randomized controlled trial titled “Comparison of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt to Lumboperitoneal Shunt for the treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: Phase I (COVLINPH-1)” trial and recruit patients at West China Hospital of Sichuan University since June 2021. And this trial is expected to end in December 2030. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned into LPS group and VPS group at ratio of 1:1 followed by evaluation before surgery, 1 month, 12 months, and 5 years after surgery. The primary outcome is the rate of shunt failure within 5 years. The secondary outcomes include modified Rankin Scale (mRS), INPH grading scale (INPHGS), mini-mental state examination (MMSE), and Evans index. We will calculate the rate of favorable outcome, which is defined as shunt success and an improvement of more than 1 point in the mRS at evaluation point. We will also analyze the complications throughout the study within 5 years after shunt insertion. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial will provide state-of-the-art evidence on the treatment option for patients with INPH, and will also generate the discussion regarding this subject. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2000031555; Pre-results. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8341364/ /pubmed/34397802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026691 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle 5300
Cui, Wenyao
Sun, Tong
Wu, Ke
You, Chao
Guan, Junwen
Comparison of ventriculoperitoneal shunt to lumboperitoneal shunt in the treatment of idiopathic: A monocentric, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial
title Comparison of ventriculoperitoneal shunt to lumboperitoneal shunt in the treatment of idiopathic: A monocentric, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of ventriculoperitoneal shunt to lumboperitoneal shunt in the treatment of idiopathic: A monocentric, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of ventriculoperitoneal shunt to lumboperitoneal shunt in the treatment of idiopathic: A monocentric, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of ventriculoperitoneal shunt to lumboperitoneal shunt in the treatment of idiopathic: A monocentric, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of ventriculoperitoneal shunt to lumboperitoneal shunt in the treatment of idiopathic: A monocentric, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of ventriculoperitoneal shunt to lumboperitoneal shunt in the treatment of idiopathic: a monocentric, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial
topic 5300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8341364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34397802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026691
work_keys_str_mv AT cuiwenyao comparisonofventriculoperitonealshunttolumboperitonealshuntinthetreatmentofidiopathicamonocentricassessorblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT suntong comparisonofventriculoperitonealshunttolumboperitonealshuntinthetreatmentofidiopathicamonocentricassessorblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wuke comparisonofventriculoperitonealshunttolumboperitonealshuntinthetreatmentofidiopathicamonocentricassessorblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT youchao comparisonofventriculoperitonealshunttolumboperitonealshuntinthetreatmentofidiopathicamonocentricassessorblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT guanjunwen comparisonofventriculoperitonealshunttolumboperitonealshuntinthetreatmentofidiopathicamonocentricassessorblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial