Cargando…

Project Inclusive Genetics: Exploring the impact of patient-centered counseling training on physical disability bias in the prenatal setting

PURPOSE: There is robust research examining the negative impact of racial and socioeconomic implicit bias on healthcare provider clinical decision-making. However, other under-studied important biases are likely to impact clinical care as well. The goal of this study was to explore the presence of b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vaimberg, Emma, Demers, Lindsay, Ford, Eric, Sabatello, Maya, Stevens, Blair, Dasgupta, Shoumita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8341652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34352009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255722
_version_ 1783733957534154752
author Vaimberg, Emma
Demers, Lindsay
Ford, Eric
Sabatello, Maya
Stevens, Blair
Dasgupta, Shoumita
author_facet Vaimberg, Emma
Demers, Lindsay
Ford, Eric
Sabatello, Maya
Stevens, Blair
Dasgupta, Shoumita
author_sort Vaimberg, Emma
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: There is robust research examining the negative impact of racial and socioeconomic implicit bias on healthcare provider clinical decision-making. However, other under-studied important biases are likely to impact clinical care as well. The goal of this study was to explore the presence of bias against people with physical disability among a heterogeneous group of healthcare workers and trainees and to evaluate the effect of implicit association testing and an educational module on this bias. METHOD: The study was composed of a one-hour web-based survey and educational module. The survey included an explicit disability bias assessment, disability Implicit Association Tests (IATs), demographic collection, and pre- and post- module clinical vignettes of prenatal patient scenarios. In addition to providing counseling to hypothetical patients, participants also indicated their personal preferences on genetic testing and termination. The educational module focused on the principles of patient-centered counseling. RESULTS: The collected data reflects responses from 335 participants. Within this sample, there were both explicit and implicit biases towards individuals with physical disabilities. Prior to the IAT and educational module, when respondents were tasked with providing genetic testing recommendations, implicit biases and personal preferences for genetic testing and termination influenced respondents’ clinical recommendations. Importantly, having previous professional experience with individuals with disabilities diminished biased clinical recommendations prior to the intervention. In response to the IAT and educational intervention, the effect of implicit bias and personal preferences on clinical recommendations decreased. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates how bias against a marginalized group exists within the medical community and that personal opinions can impact clinical counseling. Importantly, our findings suggest that there are strategies that can be easily implemented into curricula to address disability bias, including formal educational interventions and the addition of professional experiences into healthcare professional training programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8341652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83416522021-08-06 Project Inclusive Genetics: Exploring the impact of patient-centered counseling training on physical disability bias in the prenatal setting Vaimberg, Emma Demers, Lindsay Ford, Eric Sabatello, Maya Stevens, Blair Dasgupta, Shoumita PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: There is robust research examining the negative impact of racial and socioeconomic implicit bias on healthcare provider clinical decision-making. However, other under-studied important biases are likely to impact clinical care as well. The goal of this study was to explore the presence of bias against people with physical disability among a heterogeneous group of healthcare workers and trainees and to evaluate the effect of implicit association testing and an educational module on this bias. METHOD: The study was composed of a one-hour web-based survey and educational module. The survey included an explicit disability bias assessment, disability Implicit Association Tests (IATs), demographic collection, and pre- and post- module clinical vignettes of prenatal patient scenarios. In addition to providing counseling to hypothetical patients, participants also indicated their personal preferences on genetic testing and termination. The educational module focused on the principles of patient-centered counseling. RESULTS: The collected data reflects responses from 335 participants. Within this sample, there were both explicit and implicit biases towards individuals with physical disabilities. Prior to the IAT and educational module, when respondents were tasked with providing genetic testing recommendations, implicit biases and personal preferences for genetic testing and termination influenced respondents’ clinical recommendations. Importantly, having previous professional experience with individuals with disabilities diminished biased clinical recommendations prior to the intervention. In response to the IAT and educational intervention, the effect of implicit bias and personal preferences on clinical recommendations decreased. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates how bias against a marginalized group exists within the medical community and that personal opinions can impact clinical counseling. Importantly, our findings suggest that there are strategies that can be easily implemented into curricula to address disability bias, including formal educational interventions and the addition of professional experiences into healthcare professional training programs. Public Library of Science 2021-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8341652/ /pubmed/34352009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255722 Text en © 2021 Vaimberg et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vaimberg, Emma
Demers, Lindsay
Ford, Eric
Sabatello, Maya
Stevens, Blair
Dasgupta, Shoumita
Project Inclusive Genetics: Exploring the impact of patient-centered counseling training on physical disability bias in the prenatal setting
title Project Inclusive Genetics: Exploring the impact of patient-centered counseling training on physical disability bias in the prenatal setting
title_full Project Inclusive Genetics: Exploring the impact of patient-centered counseling training on physical disability bias in the prenatal setting
title_fullStr Project Inclusive Genetics: Exploring the impact of patient-centered counseling training on physical disability bias in the prenatal setting
title_full_unstemmed Project Inclusive Genetics: Exploring the impact of patient-centered counseling training on physical disability bias in the prenatal setting
title_short Project Inclusive Genetics: Exploring the impact of patient-centered counseling training on physical disability bias in the prenatal setting
title_sort project inclusive genetics: exploring the impact of patient-centered counseling training on physical disability bias in the prenatal setting
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8341652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34352009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255722
work_keys_str_mv AT vaimbergemma projectinclusivegeneticsexploringtheimpactofpatientcenteredcounselingtrainingonphysicaldisabilitybiasintheprenatalsetting
AT demerslindsay projectinclusivegeneticsexploringtheimpactofpatientcenteredcounselingtrainingonphysicaldisabilitybiasintheprenatalsetting
AT forderic projectinclusivegeneticsexploringtheimpactofpatientcenteredcounselingtrainingonphysicaldisabilitybiasintheprenatalsetting
AT sabatellomaya projectinclusivegeneticsexploringtheimpactofpatientcenteredcounselingtrainingonphysicaldisabilitybiasintheprenatalsetting
AT stevensblair projectinclusivegeneticsexploringtheimpactofpatientcenteredcounselingtrainingonphysicaldisabilitybiasintheprenatalsetting
AT dasguptashoumita projectinclusivegeneticsexploringtheimpactofpatientcenteredcounselingtrainingonphysicaldisabilitybiasintheprenatalsetting